Sunday, February 5, 2023
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result

Army Entering Period of Innovation, Critical Investments

by Army News Service
March 26, 2013
in Army News
3 min read
0
Army completes network design for Capability Set 13
14
VIEWS

The Army learned the art of adaptation throughout the last 12 years of war, but is now moving into a period of innovation that will require critical investments for the force of the future.

“Adaptation is driven by some emergency and arguably what we’ve done for the last dozen years at war,” said Lt. Gen. Keith C. Walker, director of the Army Capabilities Integration Center and deputy commander for Army Futures. “Our Army, as part of its lifecycle, was going through a period of adaptation.”

Fresh from the 2013 “Campaign of Learning” senior leader discussions in Washington, D.C., Walker said examples of that adaptation included adjusting to the modular force, the development and deployment of the mine resistant ambush protected vehicle, jammers, and the way the Army operated, Walker said.

Speaking before members of the Association of the U.S. Army, the director of the Army Capabilities Integration Center and deputy commander for Army Futures explained that the “Campaign of Learning” — a series of war games and studies to examine Army concepts — had up until now been focused on the mid-term future, a period up until 2020. He said it will now also be looking at “deep futures,” or 2030 and beyond, in later war games.

A FUTURE OF INNOVATION

“Right now, we are coming out of a period of adaptation and into a period of innovation,” Walker said. “How we do that, to invest in the future Army, is absolutely critical if we’re going to provide the nation what [it] needs when they call upon the Army.”

The general referred to several examples of past national investments, using “2013 dollars” to illustrate the cost to the nation. Included among those investments were the Manhattan Project, from 1942-1945, which saw $4.8 billion annually; the Apollo space program, from 1961 to 1972, which received on average of $13 billion a year; the B-2 bomber program, which cost $4 billion annually; and the Army digitization program, which cost $5 billion annually.

“From 2001 to 2013, the national investment in science and technology is nanotechnology, and that’s $1.5 billion annually,” he said. “So comparatively, when you stand back and look at national investment in technology, it’s relatively low.”

Walker said that in the future, effective use of strategic land power will require a commensurate investment in technology. One example of that from the past is how in the 1990s, the Army invested in a “digital force.” Today, that investment has paid off in a way that gives Soldiers a significant advantage over adversaries.

“Soldiers know where they are, know where their friends are, and they know where the enemy is,” Walker said. That “common operating picture” of the battlefield, he said, provides Soldiers with a significant advantage over America’s enemies.

He added that as the service transitions toward 2020, it will continue making great strides, through investments in the evolution of the network and sensors, to ensure Soldiers aren’t “surprised” by what they see on the battlefield.

And, while Walker said he also believes Special Forces Soldiers and conventional Soldiers will continue to be interdependent into the future, he acknowledges that Special Forces Soldiers on missions in Afghanistan have an advantage. Special Forces Soldiers currently have the full weight of the entire network and supporting intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance assets behind them. That advantage is not something conventional Soldiers presently enjoy.

“This is something we’re working on, and I think we can get there by 2020,” he said. “That has certainly been our No. 1 modernization effort.”

Walker said that while the Army is in a new period of innovation, the world is also in a new period of declining conflict — and the Army is becoming more U.S.-based. At the same time, America has shifted its defense strategy to the Pacific region, making it an area of increased strategic interest.

“We’re at a point where should the nation need to employ us in the future, we will need to strategically maneuver … go straight from home and somehow get into the battle space with no intermediate staging base, and in a very austere environment,” he said.

“Our force is heavy,” said. “I’m not saying we have too many tanks and Bradleys, but how do you get to the fight when you need to have the ability to do strategic maneuvering?”

Walker said it will be absolutely essential to have mobile protective firepower with significant innovation in lighter, stronger material. Without that, he said, it will be difficult to get where America’s leaders want the Army to go.

Right now, Walker said, the Army is “probably a couple of Nobel Prizes away” from having the technology it needs. But the Army’s “Campaign of Learning” effort continues to shape the way the Army thinks, and continues to guide the Army’s modernization efforts.

Walker said there will be another war game at the end of September. In December, he said, the Army will publish a “deep futures concept” to help better assess the capabilities needed to drive science and technology investment.

Tags: Army & Security Forces Newsbudgetinnovation
Previous Post

Eurocopter enters race for Polish chopper deal

Next Post

Congress reviews reserve forces equipment needs

Related Posts

Indonesia Orders Additional CAESAR Artillery Systems

France to send more mobile artillery to Ukraine

February 1, 2023

France will ship 12 more Caesar truck-mounted howitzers and fresh air defence equipment to Ukraine to bolster the fight against...

Leopard tanks to arrive in Ukraine around late March: Germany

Leopard tanks to arrive in Ukraine around late March: Germany

January 27, 2023

Leopard tanks pledged by Germany to help Ukraine repel Russia's invasion will arrive in "late March, early April", Defence Minister...

Next Post
River Rattlers End a Year of Adversary Missions

Congress reviews reserve forces equipment needs

Latest Defense News

Air Defense Systems, Long-Range Fires Capability to be Sent to Ukraine

Air Defense Systems, Long-Range Fires Capability to be Sent to Ukraine

February 4, 2023
Beijing accuses NATO of exaggerating ‘China threat theory’

Majority of Finns want to join NATO before Sweden: poll

February 3, 2023
China, US defence ministers to hold talks in Singapore

Pentagon tracking Chinese spy balloon over US

February 3, 2023
Eurofighter Touts Typhoon Capabilities to Poland At Air Show

UK court examines legality of resuming Saudi arms sales

February 1, 2023
If US DoD Wants #ArtificialIntelligence In Its Future, It Must Start Now

AI voice tool ‘misused’ as deepfakes flood web forum

February 1, 2023
Japan defence ministry seeks $50 billion budget

NATO chief hails Japan plans to expand defence spending

February 1, 2023

Defense Forum Discussions

  • The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread
  • Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
  • Republic of Singapore Air Force Discussions
  • Why ASEAN matters - in the era of great power competition
  • Military Aviation News and Discussion
  • NZDF General discussion thread
  • ADF General discussion thread
  • Brazilian Naval Strength
  • Italian Army discussion and Update
  • BMPT Terminator : Highly Lethal Tank Support Combat Vehicle, What Makes it so Powerful?
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com