Sunday, October 1, 2023
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result

Who Should Manage the Tanker Competition?

by Project on Government Oversight
May 29, 2009
in Air Force News
2 min read
0
14
VIEWS

As readers of the POGO Blog are well aware, the Air Force’s midair refueling tanker contract is one of the most hotly contested acquisition programs. This acquisition has been plagued with problems, with POGO and our congressional allies uncovering the now-infamous Boeing tanker lease scandal that resulted in Air Force procurement official Darleen Druyun going to jail for steering the deal to Boeing while negotiating for an executive position with Boeing.

Last June, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) sustained Boeing’s protest of the Air Force awarding the contract to Northrop Grumman. And earlier this month, Senators Richard Shelby (R-AL) and Jeff Sessions (R-AL) slowed down the confirmation of Department of Defense (DoD) acquisition chief Ashton Carter over concerns with the fate of tanker competition.

Now comes news from Defense Tech that DoD is trying to determine whether the next competition for the tanker should be managed by the Air Force or Carter.

The missteps that have occurred with the tanker program have of course been one of the main reasons that the Air Force’s acquisition system has been under such close scrutiny, and it is also part of the impetus behind the Air Force’s Roadmap to Recapture Acquisition Excellence. The tanker contract could be an opportunity for the redemption of the Air Force’s acquisition system to demonstrate that they have improved their management and can do this program right.

But what is also interesting about the oversight dispute is how this isn’t only a debate over who will be ultimately responsible for the program, but that it will also determine how much this program will be impacted by the new Weapons Acquisition Reform Act of 2009.

One of the major revisions to the Senate’s initial version of the bill in the Senate Armed Service committee’s mark-up was changing language that would require the newly established Director of Independent Cost Assessment to conduct independent cost assessments for all major defense acquisition programs (MDAPs) to only those programs where the Under Secretary for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics (AT &L) is the Milestone Decision Authority (MDA).

As Travis Sharp at the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation pointed out in his analysis, this language was changed because DoD argued that giving the Director this large of a purview would discourage the services from improving their own cost estimate competencies.

But as a result of this change in mark up, if DoD chooses to give the Air Force management of the tanker program, there will be no mandatory role for the new Director of Independent Cost Assessment to provide oversight and implement policies and procedures to make sure that the cost estimation process is reliable and objective.

One can’t help but wonder how much DoD had the tanker program in mind when requesting this change to the legislation.

As we have repeatedly said, the real test of the new legislation will be in its implementation, and DoD’s decision over who manages the tanker program may serve as an important indicator as to how committed they are to improving financial management in their major acquisition programs.

Tags: aerial refuelingcompetitioncontracttankerUS air force
Previous Post

BAE Systems and L-3 MAS to Maintain Australia’s Hornet Fleet

Next Post

US should consider military options against NKorea

Related Posts

China made third-largest air incursion this year, says Taiwan

China would gain swift air superiority over Taiwan, US leaks show

April 19, 2023

China would probably gain air superiority very quickly in any attack on Taiwan, something Russia crucially failed to do in...

Su-35 Fighter Aircraft, Russian Air Force

Iran says deal reached to buy Russian fighter jets

March 13, 2023

Iran has finalized a deal to buy Sukhoi Su-35 fighter jets from Russia, state media reported, as defence cooperation between...

Next Post

US should consider military options against NKorea

Latest Defense News

First Shipment of New Gepard Ammunition Now on its Way to Ukraine

First Shipment of New Gepard Ammunition Now on its Way to Ukraine

September 6, 2023
China will ‘never commit to abandoning the use of force’ on Taiwan: Xi

China warns against ‘new Cold War’ as big powers meet in SE Asia

September 6, 2023
US sending 3,000 more troops to Poland, as Ukraine tension rises: senior official

Poland to spend over 4% of GDP on defence in 2024

September 6, 2023
North Korea pursues weapons despite Covid blockade: UN report

North Korea to pay ‘price’ if it gives Russia arms: US

September 6, 2023
USAF F-16 fleet undergoing largest modification work in history

Russia says F-16 fighter jets in Ukraine will be seen as ‘nuclear’ threat

July 13, 2023
North Korea says conducted new test of solid-fuel ICBM

North Korea says conducted new test of solid-fuel ICBM

July 13, 2023

Defense Forum Discussions

  • The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread
  • Marine Nationale (French Navy)
  • Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates
  • Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates
  • Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
  • Indonesian Aero News
  • NATO
  • United States Marine Corps
  • Russia - General Discussion.
  • USAF News and Discussion
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com