Sunday, August 14, 2022
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result

US poised to unveil next super bomber

by Agence France-Presse
September 18, 2015
in Air Force News
3 min read
0
US poised to unveil next super bomber
14
VIEWS

Washington: The US Air Force is getting ready to announce the winner of a multibillion-dollar contract to build a new generation of long-distance bombers that will replace aging, Cold War machines.

Dubbed the Long Range Strike Bomber (LRSB) program, the Air Force will in the coming weeks award the mega-contract to either Northrop Grumman or a team made up of Boeing and Lockheed Martin.

The program envisions the creation of between 80 and 100 strategic bombers to replace America’s fleet of B-52s and B-1s. Almost everything about it is classified, save for the cost of each plane, which was set at $550 million per unit in 2010 dollars.

Experts and industry watchers say the bomber will be a very different animal from those it replaces.

Far from merely transporting bombs — nuclear or otherwise — the new planes will be high-altitude intelligence-gathering machines packed with sensors and surveillance equipment to scoop information.

Aviation analyst Richard Aboulafia said the LRSB is likely to be of a “flying-wing” design giving it stealth capabilities that make it hard to spot on radar.

It will also be able to mask its electronic signals, as well as being packed with powerful jammers to stop enemies from targeting the plane.

It won’t fly at supersonic speeds, Aboulafia said, because doing so would burn up too much fuel and reduce its range, while also making it easier to spot.

“Don’t make a lot of noise, don’t create a radar signature, go as high as you can and of course have those on-board electronic warfare systems that can jam the other guy if he does target you,” Aboulafia told AFP.

The United States already has a fleet of B-2 Stealth Bombers, which are virtually invisible to radar and have the distinctive, flying-wing design that makes them look a bit like a sci-fi boomerang.

But overseas deployments of the B-2 are rare because the United States jealously guards the costly aircraft’s secrets. There are only 20 B-2s in existence.

‘Kill switch’
Additionally, the Pentagon wants the new planes to eventually be capable of being flown without a crew and to be refuelable while airborne.

But a remote-controlled bomber is not necessarily a good idea, Aboulafia said, because it could be vulnerable to hacking and would need to be exploded via a “kill switch” if anything seemed to be going wrong.

“Pilots are the cheapest insurance policy ever,” he said, noting that a crew could get a plane out of trouble if anything went awry.

Being able to fly extremely high is important too because it would put the LRSB out of range of many surface-to-air missiles and fighters.

Countries such as Russia and China have invested heavily in missile systems and ultra-modern radar to try to counter the threat of any approaching enemy.

Experts say the new bomber is likely already well advanced in its development, but it will still take years before it is deployed.

The first flight tests of the LRSB likely won’t take place until the mid-2020s and the new planes probably wouldn’t go into action until almost 2030.

That means the Pentagon doesn’t have any immediate plans to mothball the hulking B-52 bombers that were developed in the 1950s.

High stakes
The average age of a B-52 — widely used in the Vietnam War and in the first Gulf War — is 51. The B-1 bombers, first deployed in the 1980s, are on average 29 years old.

Considering the length of the project, the Air Force has pushed the expected lives of the B-52 and B-1 to 2040. There are today about 76 B-52s and 63 B-1s in service.

Boeing and Lockheed together accounted for nearly 15 precent of the Pentagon’s acquisition budget in 2014, compared to 3.25 percent for Northrop, according to aerospace and defense market intelligence specialist BGA-AEROWEB.

The stakes for the companies could hardly be higher. The Center for Budgetary and Strategic Assessments estimates the program will cost about $73 billion.

To raise its profile at this crucial juncture, Northrop produced a tantalizing advertisement broadcast during this year’s massively viewed Super Bowl.

“Building aircraft the likes of which the world has never seen before… this is what we do,” a voice intones as the camera peeks at a cloth-covered plane, presumably their envisioned new LRSB.

Tags: air forcebomberLRSBsuper bomberUS air force
Previous Post

UK MoD Unveils Futuristic Uniform Design

Next Post

North Korea ‘hot cell’ unit could mean better, larger nuclear bombs: US experts

Related Posts

Philippines cancels Russia helicopter deal over US sanctions

Philippines cancels Russia helicopter deal over US sanctions

August 10, 2022

The Philippines has scrapped an order for 16 Russian military helicopters, an official confirmed Wednesday, following reports former president Rodrigo...

Five dead as Romania chopper crashes, fighter jet missing

Two pilots killed as Soviet-era fighter jet crashes in India

July 30, 2022

Two pilots have been killed in India after a Soviet-era fighter jet crashed during a training sortie, the air force...

Next Post
North Korea's Nodong missiles

North Korea 'hot cell' unit could mean better, larger nuclear bombs: US experts

Latest Defense News

Philippines cancels Russia helicopter deal over US sanctions

Philippines cancels Russia helicopter deal over US sanctions

August 10, 2022
West eyes more pressure on Russia after Ukraine nuclear plant attack

13 killed in Russian strikes near nuclear plant

August 10, 2022
Iran to hold new wargames in key oil waterway

Iran navy says repelled attack on ship in Red Sea

August 10, 2022
China will ‘take the gloves off’ over Taiwan: media

Taiwan FM says China using drills to ‘prepare for invasion’

August 10, 2022
US moves closer to retaliation over hacking as cyber woes grow

Finnish parliament website targeted in cyber attack

August 10, 2022
People displaced by the fighting in Burma's Laukai approach a rescue convoy

Mounting proof of crimes against humanity in Myanmar: UN probe

August 10, 2022

Defense Forum Discussions

  • Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
  • Royal New Zealand Air Force
  • Korean Peninsula Developments
  • Manned Lunar Missions
  • Fantasy RAN thread (Carriers only)
  • The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread
  • The Indonesian Army
  • General Aviation Thread
  • Royal Air Force [RAF] discussions and updates
  • Australian Army Discussions and Updates
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com