Monday, May 16, 2022
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result

Pentagon slams Russia for striking US-backed Syrian rebels

by Agence France-Presse
June 20, 2016
in War News
2 min read
0
Syria security official says rebels have missiles, sarin gas
14
VIEWS

Pentagon chief Ashton Carter on Friday hit out at Russia for bombing US-backed forces in southern Syria who he said were fighting the Islamic State group, calling their actions “problematic.”

“This was an attack on forces, first of all, that were fighting ISIL. Obviously that’s the first thing that’s problematic about this Russian conduct,” Carter told reporters, using an alternate acronym for the IS group.

Carter admitted that perhaps Russian forces made a mistake when they conducted a series of air strikes on Thursday near al-Tanaf — but said in that case, it highlighted poor intelligence on their side.

“If it was their intention, it is the opposite of what they said they were going to do,” he said. “If not, it says something about the quality of information upon which they make their strikes.”

On Thursday, a senior US defense official said that Russian aircraft had not been active in the al-Tanaf area on Syria’s border with Iraq “for some time” and that there were “no Syrian regime or Russian ground forces in the vicinity.”

The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said two US-backed fighters — one Syrian and one Iraqi — were killed in the strikes.

The Syrian belonged a group of fighters from the New Syrian Army, trained by the British and the Americans in a coalition camp in Jordan, while the Iraqi was a tribal fighter, Observatory chief Rami Abdel Rahman said.

Russia’s defense ministry said late Thursday that it had not carried out any strikes targeting opposition forces included in the ceasefire, without mentioning Al-Tanaf.

The United States and Russia have put in place a channel of communication so that they can ensure that their separate air campaigns in Syria do not result in any unsafe incidents.

But Carter said the communications link “was not professionally used.”

“We are trying to clarify the facts and use that channel with the Russians to understand what went on,” he said.

The US military launched a $500 million program in early 2015 to train entire units of “moderate” Syrians to fight Islamic State jihadists.

But the program drew heavy fire last fall after admitting the efforts had floundered, with numbers of trainees falling massively short of the planned 5,000.

One group even handed over ammunition and other gear to a local Al-Qaeda affiliate known as the Al-Nusra Front.

Since then, the Pentagon’s new strategy is to work with just a handful of members from each fighting group, instead of an entire unit.

Syria’s five-year war has killed more than 280,000 people and displaced millions.

Tags: middle eastrebelsrussiasyriawar
Previous Post

Russia’s S-400, S-500 Set to Become Invisible to Enemies

Next Post

DOD Releases Report On Enhancing Security and Stability In Afghanistan

Related Posts

Javelin anti-tank missiles

Western arms to Ukraine preventing ‘quick’ end to conflict: Kremlin

May 6, 2022

The Kremlin on Thursday accused the West of preventing a "quick" end to Russia's military campaign in Ukraine by supplying...

Urban warfare ‘nightmare’ looms if Russia enters Ukraine cities

US intel helped Ukraine target Russian generals: NYT

May 5, 2022

Intelligence provided by the United States has helped the Ukrainian military target several Russian generals since Moscow's invasion, the New...

Next Post

DOD Releases Report On Enhancing Security and Stability In Afghanistan

Latest Defense News

PzH 2000 Self-propelled Howitzer

Germany to send self-propelled howitzers to Ukraine

May 6, 2022
Coronavirus challenges US military machine

Pentagon denies helping Ukraine ‘target’ Russian generals

May 6, 2022
Javelin anti-tank missiles

Western arms to Ukraine preventing ‘quick’ end to conflict: Kremlin

May 6, 2022
MH-60R Sea Hawk helicopters

Taiwan scraps deal to buy US anti-submarine helicopters

May 6, 2022
Franco-German treaty a step toward ‘European army’: Merkel

NATO eyes ‘heightened presence’ around Sweden, Baltic

May 6, 2022
Urban warfare ‘nightmare’ looms if Russia enters Ukraine cities

US intel helped Ukraine target Russian generals: NYT

May 5, 2022

Defense Forum Discussions

  • The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread
  • Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates
  • Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
  • The Indonesian Army
  • NZDF General discussion thread
  • Ukrainian - Russian War Memes.
  • Germany
  • Australian Army Discussions and Updates
  • S.Korea, Indonesia to develop 4.5 gen fighter aircraft KFX
  • Space X Boca Chico Build & Launch Facility.
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com