Thursday, March 23, 2023
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result

North Korean blast smaller than thought, says expert

by Agence France-Presse
May 27, 2009
in Nuclear Weapons News
2 min read
0
14
VIEWS

Paris: North Korea’s claimed second nuclear test appears to have been a relatively small blast that is only a fraction of the size estimated by Russia, an expert said on Tuesday.

“The yield is about four kilotonnes equivalent of TNT, with an uncertainty range from three to eight kilotonnes,” Martin Kalinowski, a professor at the Carl Friedrich von Weizsacker Centre for Science and Peace Research (ZNF), at the University of Hamburg, told AFP.

Russia had estimated the force of Monday’s underground blast at up 20 kilotonnes, or the equivalent of 20,000 tonnes of TNT, which would have placed it in the same category as the 1945 Hiroshima bomb.

Kalinowski said he was at a loss to explain how Russia had arrived at this figure.

“I don’t know how the Russians arrived at their high estimate,” he said.

“I haven’t seen any technical evidence as to how they calculated this yield, no idea, but it’s definitely wrong.”

Analysis of Monday’s blast is based on data from seismographic sensors that measure shockwaves in the ground.

But the only way to give “solid scientific proof” that the explosion was a nuclear one — as opposed to a blast using conventional explosions — is to get airborne samples of radioactive particles or rare gases that are typically vented from an underground blast, Kalinowski said.

He added though that the location and size of the event stacked the odds firmly in favour of a nuclear blast.

North Korea’s first nuclear test, in October 2006, was also initially estimated by Russia at the equivalent of between five and 15 kilotonnes.

Experts later downgraded it to one kilotonne or less — a tiny yield that sparked frenzied speculation.

One theory was North Korea had simply detonated a big pile of TNT in order to trick its enemies into believing it had joined the nuclear club.

But this was later discounted when radionuclide evidence proved that the blast had indeed been a nuclear one.

Another hypothesis was that the blast was a failure — perhaps a larger bomb that had failed to go into a chain reaction. A third idea was that the North Koreans had ignited a miniaturised bomb.

Kalinowski said that Monday’s test was probably not a miniaturised device, as this is a technology that traditionally only established nuclear powers can master.

“The four-kilotonne estimate hints that the explosion was not fulfilling the goal of North Korea completely, but it’s not a big difference from the optimum yield that one could produce with a couple of kilogrammes (a few pounds) of plutonium,” he said.

“The first nuclear explosion was definitely too low compared to expectations. but this one I would say is OK. It’s not optimum, but it’s a big bang, it’s a nuclear explosion and a strong one for a fission bomb.”

In terms of explosive power, hydrogen bombs and other thermonuclear devices are far bigger, “but they are second-generation weapons that North Korea clearly does not have and does not attempt,” Kalinowksi said.

“It’s a first-generation fission nuclear weapon and that is about the size of yield that you would expect from such a weapon, a little less than possible, but with a pure fission device the yield anyway cannot be much higher than 10 or 20 kilotonnes.”

Tags: north koreanuclear programnuclear testsize
Previous Post

Russia-Belarus firm to export Pechora-2M air defense systems

Next Post

China air force to show off new equipment on National Day

Related Posts

North Korea says Kim ordered test of ‘new type’ of ICBM

North Korea adopts war deterrence measures: state media

March 13, 2023

North Korea has decided to take "important practical" war deterrence measures, state media reported Sunday, a day before Seoul and...

Putin: Russia battling ‘Western domination’ as Ukraine war grinds on

Russian deputies back Putin over nuclear arms treaty

February 23, 2023

Russian lawmakers on Wednesday unanimously approved the suspension of Moscow's participation in the New START arms treaty, which President Vladimir...

Next Post

China air force to show off new equipment on National Day

Latest Defense News

Russian navy in show of strength with 26 new ships this year

Russian navy ‘repelled’ drone attack on Crimea port

March 23, 2023
Officials provide details on building the Space Force, its structure, and operating imperatives

Reagan’s ‘Star Wars’ at 40: Battle of the satellites

March 23, 2023
China will ‘never commit to abandoning the use of force’ on Taiwan: Xi

China diplomatic offensive lays down new challenge for US

March 22, 2023
Hwasong-17 ICBM

North Korea fires ‘long-range’ missile as S. Korea president heads to Japan

March 16, 2023
North Korea fires multiple suspected cruise missiles

North Korea fires two ballistic missiles, Seoul says

March 14, 2023
Australia to get nuclear submarines in new US, British partnership

Australia to buy US nuclear subs in ambitious new pact

March 14, 2023

Defense Forum Discussions

  • Indian Navy Discussions and Updates
  • The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread
  • Russia and the West
  • Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
  • Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates
  • Warbirds (Historical, Veteran & Vintage Military Aircraft)
  • Australian Army Discussions and Updates
  • Ukrainian - Russian War Memes.
  • Indonesian Aero News
  • Royal Danish Navy
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com