Saturday, May 28, 2022
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result

House Reverses Itself, Votes to Kill F-22 Buy

by Project on Government Oversight
August 4, 2009
in Air Force News
3 min read
0
14
VIEWS

Just four weeks after the U.S. House of Representatives voted by an overwhelming margin to begin buying a dozen more F-22s, the representatives reversed themselves July 30 and approved a defense appropriations bill that would end the stealth-fighter program.

Why the difference? President Barack Obama, the U.S. Air Force and Lockheed Martin.

“I think when the president made it clear that he would veto a bill containing F-22 funding, the House and Senate have both indicated that they do not wish to risk a veto over that one issue,” said Scott Lilly, a former staff director of the House Appropriations Committee.

The defense appropriations bill provides $640.4 billion for the U.S. military for 2010. That includes $128.2 billion for fighting the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. F-22 funding was a fraction of a percent of the total, not enough for many lawmakers to risk the whole bill, Lilly said.

“The veto threat really made a difference,” agreed Christopher Hellman, a defense budget specialist for the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation. “When the president says he’s going to veto a bill, it means something.”

Lockheed, which builds the F-22 Raptor, also influenced the vote, mainly by its silence, said Loren Thompson, a defense analyst at the Lexington Institute, Arlington, Va. “For the first time ever, the Air Force and the contractor were not lobbying to save the program,” Thompson said.

Indeed, senior Air Force officials testified against buying more Raptors. For Lockheed, it became a matter of sacrificing the F-22 to preserve the much more lucrative F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, he said.

The F-35 is “the biggest defense program in the history of the world.” Ultimately, it may be worth more than $1 trillion to Lockheed. “It’s absolutely huge,” Thompson said. Lockheed decided not to anger the Obama administration – and possibly endanger the F-35 – by crossing swords with Defense Secretary Robert Gates “over a few additional F-22s,” Thompson said.

The U.S. military plans to buy 2,443 F-35s, and eight foreign countries are expected to buy hundreds more.

“For the contractor, the quid pro quo was clear,” Thompson said. “Cease and desist on the F-22 and keep the F-35.”

Gates, too, helped prepare the way for votes against the F-22, Thompson said. In June 2008, he forced Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne and Gen. Michael Moseley, the service’s chief of staff, to resign. The immediate cause was lax Air Force handling of nuclear weapons.

But Moseley and Wynne had repeatedly clashed with Gates over the F-22. They wanted more stealth fighters and Gates did not. Those factors were bubbling in the background when Obama issued his veto threat.

Before the House voted on the defense authorization bill, the White House warned that if the bill included funding for more F-22s, “the president’s senior advisers would recommend a veto.”

The House ignored the warning and passed the bill with F-22 funding by 389-22.

By July 15, as the Senate was preparing to vote on its version of the authorization bill, Obama’s position had hardened. This time, the White House warned that if the final bill contained F-22 money, “the president will veto it.”

The Senate removed F-22 funding and passed its defense authorization bill by unanimous consent.

The White House issued the same veto admonition to the House on July 28, two days before the vote on the defense appropriations bill, which provides the actual money for authorizations. The House voted 269-165 to pass an amendment that would shift $369 million slated to buy parts for new F-22s to purchase spare parts and engines for existing aircraft.

The House then passed the 2010 Defense Appropriations Act by 400-30.

It looks like the end of the production line for the F-22, said Mandy Smithberger of the Project on Government Oversight, which has long opposed the F-22 as overpriced and built for a threat that no longer exists.

But, Smithberger cautioned, nothing is final until versions of the authorization and appropriations bills are passed by Congress and signed by the president. The Senate has yet to vote on its version of the appropriations bill.

Conceived in the early 1980s to battle Soviet fighters over Europe, the F-22 was plagued by production delays and cost overruns. The first planes didn’t become operational until late 2005, and by then they cost about $360 million per plane, including development costs. They have not yet flown in combat.

“This thing has got more lives than a vampire,” Hellman said. Right now, the F-22’s future looks bleak, but the production line will turn out F-22s for several more years, he said.

A new study – possibly the 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review – may recommend producing more F-22s, or a change in the threat environment could revive the program.

“Until I see its severed head, I’m not ready to rule it totally out at this point,” Hellman said.

Tags: budgetF-22kill F-22stealth fighterUS air forcevote
Previous Post

ANZAC Missile Defence Project on Track

Next Post

First Assembly of Euro Hawk Unmanned Aircraft for Germany

Related Posts

Boeing shares dive as 777X delay, Air Force One woes lead to $1.2 bn loss

Boeing shares dive as 777X delay, Air Force One woes lead to $1.2 bn loss

April 27, 2022

Boeing shares were in free-fall early Wednesday after the aviation giant reported a $1.2 billion loss in an ugly quarter...

Ukraine Launches Air Exercises With NATO Countries

Ukraine receives fighter planes, parts to bolster air force: Pentagon

April 20, 2022

Ukraine has received fighter planes and aircraft parts to bolster its air force in the face of Russia's invasion, the...

Next Post

First Assembly of Euro Hawk Unmanned Aircraft for Germany

Latest Defense News

North Korea

North Korea testing ‘nuclear detonation device’: Seoul

May 26, 2022
Erdogan says parliament to vote in January on Libya troop deployment

Turkey threatens to stall NATO process if Nordic nations fail to act

May 26, 2022
Chinese, US warships sailed through Taiwan Strait before Biden-Xi talks

China says ‘no intention’ to build Solomons military base

May 26, 2022
EU warns Belarus opening door to Russian nukes after vote

New military bases in western Russia in response to NATO expansion: minister

May 20, 2022
NATO warns Russia readying for ‘full-scale attack’ on Ukraine

Signs multiply Russia seeks control of south Ukraine

May 20, 2022
Biden to announce anti-gun violence measures

Biden begins Asia trip in South Korea, under North nuclear shadow

May 20, 2022

Defense Forum Discussions

  • The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread
  • Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
  • Australian Army Discussions and Updates
  • NZDF General discussion thread
  • General Aviation Thread
  • TOP GUN the real deal
  • Russia and the West
  • Military Aviation News and Discussion
  • Indonesian Aero News
  • Japan, Koreas, China and Taiwan regional issues
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com