Friday, March 24, 2023
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result

House Reverses Itself, Votes to Kill F-22 Buy

by Project on Government Oversight
August 4, 2009
in Air Force News
3 min read
0
14
VIEWS

Just four weeks after the U.S. House of Representatives voted by an overwhelming margin to begin buying a dozen more F-22s, the representatives reversed themselves July 30 and approved a defense appropriations bill that would end the stealth-fighter program.

Why the difference? President Barack Obama, the U.S. Air Force and Lockheed Martin.

“I think when the president made it clear that he would veto a bill containing F-22 funding, the House and Senate have both indicated that they do not wish to risk a veto over that one issue,” said Scott Lilly, a former staff director of the House Appropriations Committee.

The defense appropriations bill provides $640.4 billion for the U.S. military for 2010. That includes $128.2 billion for fighting the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. F-22 funding was a fraction of a percent of the total, not enough for many lawmakers to risk the whole bill, Lilly said.

“The veto threat really made a difference,” agreed Christopher Hellman, a defense budget specialist for the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation. “When the president says he’s going to veto a bill, it means something.”

Lockheed, which builds the F-22 Raptor, also influenced the vote, mainly by its silence, said Loren Thompson, a defense analyst at the Lexington Institute, Arlington, Va. “For the first time ever, the Air Force and the contractor were not lobbying to save the program,” Thompson said.

Indeed, senior Air Force officials testified against buying more Raptors. For Lockheed, it became a matter of sacrificing the F-22 to preserve the much more lucrative F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, he said.

The F-35 is “the biggest defense program in the history of the world.” Ultimately, it may be worth more than $1 trillion to Lockheed. “It’s absolutely huge,” Thompson said. Lockheed decided not to anger the Obama administration – and possibly endanger the F-35 – by crossing swords with Defense Secretary Robert Gates “over a few additional F-22s,” Thompson said.

The U.S. military plans to buy 2,443 F-35s, and eight foreign countries are expected to buy hundreds more.

“For the contractor, the quid pro quo was clear,” Thompson said. “Cease and desist on the F-22 and keep the F-35.”

Gates, too, helped prepare the way for votes against the F-22, Thompson said. In June 2008, he forced Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne and Gen. Michael Moseley, the service’s chief of staff, to resign. The immediate cause was lax Air Force handling of nuclear weapons.

But Moseley and Wynne had repeatedly clashed with Gates over the F-22. They wanted more stealth fighters and Gates did not. Those factors were bubbling in the background when Obama issued his veto threat.

Before the House voted on the defense authorization bill, the White House warned that if the bill included funding for more F-22s, “the president’s senior advisers would recommend a veto.”

The House ignored the warning and passed the bill with F-22 funding by 389-22.

By July 15, as the Senate was preparing to vote on its version of the authorization bill, Obama’s position had hardened. This time, the White House warned that if the final bill contained F-22 money, “the president will veto it.”

The Senate removed F-22 funding and passed its defense authorization bill by unanimous consent.

The White House issued the same veto admonition to the House on July 28, two days before the vote on the defense appropriations bill, which provides the actual money for authorizations. The House voted 269-165 to pass an amendment that would shift $369 million slated to buy parts for new F-22s to purchase spare parts and engines for existing aircraft.

The House then passed the 2010 Defense Appropriations Act by 400-30.

It looks like the end of the production line for the F-22, said Mandy Smithberger of the Project on Government Oversight, which has long opposed the F-22 as overpriced and built for a threat that no longer exists.

But, Smithberger cautioned, nothing is final until versions of the authorization and appropriations bills are passed by Congress and signed by the president. The Senate has yet to vote on its version of the appropriations bill.

Conceived in the early 1980s to battle Soviet fighters over Europe, the F-22 was plagued by production delays and cost overruns. The first planes didn’t become operational until late 2005, and by then they cost about $360 million per plane, including development costs. They have not yet flown in combat.

“This thing has got more lives than a vampire,” Hellman said. Right now, the F-22’s future looks bleak, but the production line will turn out F-22s for several more years, he said.

A new study – possibly the 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review – may recommend producing more F-22s, or a change in the threat environment could revive the program.

“Until I see its severed head, I’m not ready to rule it totally out at this point,” Hellman said.

Tags: budgetF-22kill F-22stealth fighterUS air forcevote
Previous Post

ANZAC Missile Defence Project on Track

Next Post

First Assembly of Euro Hawk Unmanned Aircraft for Germany

Related Posts

Su-35 Fighter Aircraft, Russian Air Force

Iran says deal reached to buy Russian fighter jets

March 13, 2023

Iran has finalized a deal to buy Sukhoi Su-35 fighter jets from Russia, state media reported, as defence cooperation between...

USAF F-16 fleet undergoing largest modification work in history

US jets intercept Russian aircraft near Alaska

February 15, 2023

Two American F-16 warplanes intercepted four Russian aircraft near Alaska, the joint US-Canadian North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) said...

Next Post

First Assembly of Euro Hawk Unmanned Aircraft for Germany

Latest Defense News

Russian navy in show of strength with 26 new ships this year

Russian navy ‘repelled’ drone attack on Crimea port

March 23, 2023
Officials provide details on building the Space Force, its structure, and operating imperatives

Reagan’s ‘Star Wars’ at 40: Battle of the satellites

March 23, 2023
China will ‘never commit to abandoning the use of force’ on Taiwan: Xi

China diplomatic offensive lays down new challenge for US

March 22, 2023
Hwasong-17 ICBM

North Korea fires ‘long-range’ missile as S. Korea president heads to Japan

March 16, 2023
North Korea fires multiple suspected cruise missiles

North Korea fires two ballistic missiles, Seoul says

March 14, 2023
Australia to get nuclear submarines in new US, British partnership

Australia to buy US nuclear subs in ambitious new pact

March 14, 2023

Defense Forum Discussions

  • Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
  • The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread
  • Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates
  • NZDF General discussion thread
  • (4K) 2 Eurofighter Typhoon German Air Force Luftwaffe departure at Neuburg Donau Airbase ETSN
  • Italian Air Force Update and Topic
  • Indian Navy Discussions and Updates
  • Russia and the West
  • Warbirds (Historical, Veteran & Vintage Military Aircraft)
  • Australian Army Discussions and Updates
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com