Wednesday, May 18, 2022
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result

Official Announces Plans to Curb Fighter Program’s Cost

by US Department of Defense
March 16, 2010
in Air Force News
3 min read
0
14
VIEWS

WASHINGTON: The Defense Department will require a shift to a fixed-price contract in its negotiations with Lockheed Martin for the initial production phase of the F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter, a defense official said here today in a briefing at the Pentagon.

The department also will conduct an internal analysis of what the full production cost should be to better negotiate with the contractor, said Ashton B. Carter, undersecretary of defense for acquisition, technology, and logistics.

Taken together, Carter said, these measures will reduce costs of a program that has met with significant production delays and cost overruns since its inception in October 2001.

“It did not seem reasonable that the taxpayer should bear the entire cost of this failure of the program to meet expectations,” Carter said.

The Joint Strike Fighter– the most expensive acquisition in U.S. military history — will replace a wide range of aging fighter and strike aircraft for the Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps and eight international partners. The F-35 is the “the heart of the future of our tactical combat aviation,” Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said in a visit to a Lockheed factory in August. “The importance of this aircraft cannot be overstated.”

The U.S. military ordered a total of 2,443 jets, with an additional 730 purchased by the eight other countries. Initially projected to cost around $50 million per aircraft, the current estimate is about $80 million to $95 million each, in inflation-adjusted dollars.

These two new initiatives come on top of Gates’ announcement last month that he was withholding $614 million in performance fees from the contractor due to the program’s setbacks.

With today’s announcements, the department is moving away from a cost-plus arrangement, which reimburses companies for their expenses in addition to providing an extra payment to guarantee them a profit. Instead, in switching to a fixed-price structure, the department and the contractor will set the price beforehand, and the final payment will not depend on the total amount of time or resources expended to complete the project.

“[The secretary] directed that in order to ensure discipline in the transition from development to production,” Carter said.

The director of defense procurement and acquisition policy will conduct the “should-cost” analysis for the final production rollout of the F-35 aircraft. Carter stressed that it’s important for the department to have its own estimate of what the program’s cost should be to better determine a negotiated price, rather than relying solely on the contractor’s figures.

“We will be looking at the cost structure of [the Joint Strike Fighter] in all its aspects – assembly, parts supplies, staffing, overheads and indirect costs, cash flows, contract structures, fees, and lifecycle costs,” Carter said in a prepared statement before the Senate Armed Services committee yesterday.

Taking immediate steps to save costs is particularly necessary, not only to benefit the taxpayer, but also because the program is in jeopardy of crossing the Nunn-McCurdy threshold, a law that requires that Congress be notified of a cost growth of more than 15 percent in a program. Nunn-McCurdy also calls for cancellation of programs for which total cost grew by more than 25 percent over the original estimate.

Rather than wait for the program to cross the Nunn-McCurdy line, the defense officials began to review and restructure it as though it was already in Nunn-McCurdy breach, Carter explained.

Carter said he understands that these new initiatives will not be easy for Lockheed and its subcontractors to accommodate, but he underscored that these decisions are crucial to moving the program forward in a way that is acceptable to the military and the American public.

“The emphasis must be on restoring a key aspect of this airplane when the JSF program was first launched: affordability,” he told Congress.

Read full transcript of the press conference

Tags: budgetcostF-35Fighter AircraftPrice
Previous Post

Germany Doubles Arms Exports

Next Post

India’s missile shield test fails: Officials

Related Posts

Boeing shares dive as 777X delay, Air Force One woes lead to $1.2 bn loss

Boeing shares dive as 777X delay, Air Force One woes lead to $1.2 bn loss

April 27, 2022

Boeing shares were in free-fall early Wednesday after the aviation giant reported a $1.2 billion loss in an ugly quarter...

Ukraine Launches Air Exercises With NATO Countries

Ukraine receives fighter planes, parts to bolster air force: Pentagon

April 20, 2022

Ukraine has received fighter planes and aircraft parts to bolster its air force in the face of Russia's invasion, the...

Next Post

India's missile shield test fails: Officials

Latest Defense News

Somali forces capture rebel stronghold

Biden reestablishes US troop presence inside Somalia

May 17, 2022
Chile redeploys army to restive southern region

Chile redeploys army to restive southern region

May 17, 2022
Erdogan threatens to block NATO’s Baltic defence plan

Turkey ‘will not say yes’ to NATO membership for Sweden, Finland: Erdogan

May 17, 2022
Beijing accuses NATO of exaggerating ‘China threat theory’

Sweden enters ‘new era’ with NATO bid

May 17, 2022
PzH 2000 Self-propelled Howitzer

Germany to send self-propelled howitzers to Ukraine

May 6, 2022
Coronavirus challenges US military machine

Pentagon denies helping Ukraine ‘target’ Russian generals

May 6, 2022

Defense Forum Discussions

  • China - Geostrategic & Geopolitical.
  • The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread
  • US Army News and updates general discussion
  • NZDF General discussion thread
  • Indian Navy Discussions and Updates
  • Japan, Koreas, China and Taiwan regional issues
  • Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
  • Russian Army/Ground Forces Discussion and Updates
  • Indonesian Aero News
  • Israeli AFVs
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com