Wednesday, June 18, 2025
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result
Home Weapons Air Force Systems Bomber Aircraft

B-36 Peacemaker

by Editor
July 19, 2007
in Bomber Aircraft
1 min read
0
14
VIEWS

After observing Nazi Germany’s aggression and Japanese dare to attack Pearl Harbor, the

US
decided to develop a plane that will counter this antagonism – the B-36 was the end result of this decision. The Army Air Forces (AAF) needed a long range bomber that will carry the war to the enemy, B-36 provided that though its process moved on rather slowly.

The B-36 had six engines with a 3,740-nm combat radius and a 1,757-nm radius. It could carry bomb load of 86,000 pounds. With a wingspan of 230 feet, a length of 162 feet, and a height of nearly 49 feet, the B-36 had an official range of 10,000 miles. When loaded, the B-36 burned fuel at an excessive rate. Actual range for the bomber was 6,800 to 8,175 miles, with aerial refueling required.

Military setbacks in 1942 forced the Army Air Forces to focus on the Boeing B-29 which was already under making since September 1941; and it happened at the expense of the B-36. But in spring of 1943, the situation changed following indications that

China
would collapse. The Army Air Forces thought that B-36 might be the only bomber able to attack the Japanese homeland. AAF therefore ordered 100 B-36s. The manufacturer soon after struggled with several development troubles, engine and weight increase problems. During mid 1944, engine problems reached at peak. Convair’s request at that time of considering another engine was also ignored because of high cost, time and technical unknowns. B-36

Previous Post

XB-35 Flying Wing

Next Post

XB-42

Related Posts

F-15E officially first compatible fighter for B61-12 nuclear bomb

June 10, 2020

An F-15E strike fighter aircraft demonstrating weapon system deployment of an inert B61-12 munition at Sandia...

FB-111 Strategic Bomber

January 9, 2015

The FB-111A, manufactured by the General Dynamics in December 1966, evolved in a bid to replace the B-58 and to...

Next Post

XB-42

Latest Defense News

Britain, Germany jointly developing missiles: ministers

Britain, Germany jointly developing missiles: ministers

May 17, 2025
Trump announces ‘full and immediate’ India-Pakistan ceasefire

Trump announces ‘full and immediate’ India-Pakistan ceasefire

May 10, 2025
Pakistan says Indian missiles strike air bases as conflict spirals

Pakistan says Indian missiles strike air bases as conflict spirals

May 10, 2025
J-10C fighter jet

Pakistan says India has brought neighbours ‘closer to major conflict’

May 9, 2025
North Korea fires multiple suspected cruise missiles

North Korea fires flurry of short-range ballistic missiles

May 9, 2025
China says ‘closely watching’ Ukraine situation after Russian attack

China vows to stand with Russia in face of ‘hegemonic bullying’

May 9, 2025

Defense Forum Discussions

  • Middle East Defence & Security
  • General Aviation Thread
  • Australian Army Discussions and Updates
  • The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread
  • Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
  • Indonesia: 'green water navy'
  • RMAF Future; need opinions
  • Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) News and Discussions
  • Could this B-24 Liberator, found in the Philippines, be the missing RAAF Aircraft A72-191?
  • Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com