Saturday, July 2, 2022
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result

Army Post-9/11 GI Bill transfer policy to take effect August 1

by Army News Service
April 22, 2013
in Army News
2 min read
0
Changes coming to the Post-9/11 GI-Bill
14
VIEWS

Beginning Aug. 1, 2013, every Soldier who elects to transfer their Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to a family member will incur an additional four years in the Army, without regard to their time in service.

“This policy was drafted in 2009 and takes effect Aug. 1, 2013. It is important that we inform Soldiers of this existing policy regarding the Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits,” said Lt. Col. Mark Viney, chief of the Enlisted Professional Development Branch, Army G-1.

That news comes in a message to military personnel, dated April 15, 2013.

The rule largely affects senior officers and enlisted Soldiers who are retirement-eligible. As of now, these Soldiers may be able to transfer benefits to their loved ones with anywhere from zero to three years of additional service.

Soldiers who are not retirement eligible, electing to transfer their GI Bill benefits to a family member means re-upping for an additional four years.

Come Aug. 1, that rule will apply to all Soldiers, whether they are retirement-eligible or not.

“The Post-9/11 GI Bill. Soldiers are entitled to the benefit for their own use, but to transfer to dependents: that is used as a recruiting and retention tool,” said Lt. Col. Mark Viney, chief of the Enlisted Professional Development Branch, Army G-1.

Viney also serves as the policy proponent for the Army’s Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits Program.

“We want Soldiers to be informed of the impact of this policy,” Viney said. “This is going to impact their decisions and their families, and whether or not they are going to have this money available to fund their dependent’s education.”

Veterans Affairs, or VA, also has eligibility requirements for transferability. A Soldier must have six years of active duty in order to transfer his GI Bill benefits.

In some cases, if a Soldier has incurred additional time in service in order to transfer GI Bill benefits to a family member, and is afterward unable to serve that additional time in service, he or she may be required to pay back those benefits.

Viney said that as the Army draws down, some Soldiers will be involuntarily separated under force-shaping initiatives. Soldiers who are separated early under such circumstances and who had previously transferred their Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to their dependents may retain the transferred benefits, without needing to repay them to the VA.

Soldiers with questions about transferring their Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to their dependents should contact their approving official.

Tags: Army & Security Forces NewsbenefitsGI Bill
Previous Post

Reserve, Guard leaders discuss FY14 budget

Next Post

Pentagon chief heads to Israel after US arms deal unveiled

Related Posts

CV90 Infantry Fighting Vehicle: Innovating by Warfighters for Warfighters

Slovakia to buy 152 Swedish combat vehicles

June 30, 2022

NATO member Slovakia, which shares a border with Ukraine, said Tuesday it plans to buy 152 tracked combat vehicles from...

US, Morocco launch vast military exercise

US, Morocco launch vast military exercise

June 23, 2022

The United States and Morocco on Monday launched the vast annual "African Lion" military exercise, amid heightened tensions between the...

Next Post
Hagel Issues Message to Defense Department Workforce

Pentagon chief heads to Israel after US arms deal unveiled

Latest Defense News

Joint military forces kick off Cope North 2020

Biden says US ‘should sell’ F-16 Fighter Jets to Turkey

June 30, 2022
China offers to mediate Horn of Africa disputes

NATO wary of Russian, Chinese ‘gains’ on southern flank

June 30, 2022
F-35A Lightning II Fighter Jet

Greece formalizes request for US-made F-35 fighter jets: PM

June 30, 2022
Franco-German treaty a step toward ‘European army’: Merkel

Relief and concern in Sweden after NATO deal with Turkey

June 30, 2022
Jordan to Buy Guided Multiple Launch Rocket Systems

Norway to send rocket launchers to Ukraine

June 30, 2022

Britain boosts military aid to Ukraine

June 30, 2022

Defense Forum Discussions

  • New Zealand Army
  • Modern CIWS systems
  • NZDF General discussion thread
  • German Navy
  • Svenska Flygvapnet/Swedish Air Force
  • The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread
  • Ukrainian - Russian War Memes.
  • (4K) Air Force One USA United States of America departure at Munich Airport G7 Summit
  • ADF General discussion thread
  • US Army News and updates general discussion
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com