Friday, March 13, 2026
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result
Home Defence & Military News Defense Geopolitics News War News

Nobody Wanted War In Kurdistan

by Editor
October 31, 2007
in War News
3 min read
0
14
VIEWS

RIA Novosti,

Moscow: Nobody wanted a war in northern Iraq, now being invaded by Turkish forces. The Kurdistan Workers Party, established by the Turkish Kurds, was probably the only organization interested in a conflict with Ankara. Its paramilitary units stationed in Iraqi Kurdistan have been conducting sporadic operations against the Turkish army for many years.

The latest conflict and the deployment of Turkish troops in northern Iraq created problems for everyone.

Turkish generals are complaining that they have not been able to defeat the Kurdistan Workers Party's guerrillas and destroy their bases in Iraqi Kurdistan for a long time because they have been fighting with their hands tied. The insurgents were able to retreat to their bases every time a full-blown military operation got underway.

Ankara wants to deal a crushing blow against the militants and their bases outside Turkey in the course of large-scale operations.

However, it will not be able to pacify Iraqi Kurdistan for a long time because a guerrilla war will flare up there. Although the Turkish army will quickly defeat all units of the Kurdistan Workers Party and those of the Kurdistan Democratic Party trying to support the Turkish Kurds, it will not stay in northern Iraq for a long time.

Five years ago I visited the border between Iraqi and Turkish Kurdistan, and Turkish forces were able to defeat Kurdish units, but relations between Ankara and the Iraqi Kurds would be soured. Although the military operation would appease the Turkish, it would produce no long-term results.

Although Iraqi Kurdistan is virtually independent, the European Union, which is still reluctant to admit Turkey, would perceive the current hostilities as an aggression against Baghdad.

Technically speaking, Iraqi Kurdistan remains part of Iraq, a UN member; consequently, the EU will condemn the Turkish aggression and create additional roadblocks for Ankara's accession.

The United States will also face serious problems if Ankara conducts a large-scale military operation because it cannot betray the Iraqi Kurds, its only loyal and staunch allies in war-torn Iraq.

It is common knowledge that the Iraqi Kurds were looking forward to the U.S. invasion in 2003 because they knew that Washington would topple the Saddam Hussein regime.

Consequently, the White House would face dire prospects if it turns a blind eye to possible Turkish atrocities against the Iraqi Kurds. But Turkey, a NATO member, is an equally important U.S. ally.

The United States could do something to protect the Iraqi Kurds in case of a military operation, but that the situation would deteriorate if the Kurdistan Democratic Party joined in the conflict.

Although there are no U.S. forces in Iraqi Kurdistan, it is difficult to imagine the consequences of a possible clash between them and the Turkish army.

The United States could find itself between two fires and face a serious dilemma. The Turkish government realizes that Washington will never forgive Ankara if it forces America to choose between the lesser of two evils.

The Turkish invasion of Iraqi Kurdistan would be branded as an aggression against sovereign Iraq, and that the Iraqi army would strike back. However, such operations would not be very effective because Baghdad still lacks the military potential for combating terrorism in other parts of the country.

The Kurdistan Workers Party would be the only one to profit from the Turkish military operation because surviving militants would regroup in mountain areas. These extremists are ready to sustain losses in a protracted war for the sake of seceding from Turkey and establishing an independent state.

Consequently, the Turkish occupation of Iraqi Kurdistan would meet their interests because everyone would condemn Ankara's aggression and because the Kurdistan Democratic Party would support the Turkish Kurds.

Georgy Mirsky, Ph.D., is a senior research fellow at the Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences.

The opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.

Previous Post

Africa Partnership Station Kicks Off

Next Post

Major Test of First Advanced Military Communications Satellite

Related Posts

Israel cancels leave for combat units after Iran consulate strike

US says Iran campaign cost $11 billion in six days

March 12, 2026

The opening week of the war against Iran cost the United States more than $11.3 billion, lawmakers were told in...

Lebanon says Israeli strike kills 3 journalists

Israel strikes central Beirut as Lebanon death toll tops 630

March 11, 2026

Israel carried out a strike in the heart of Beirut on Wednesday for a second time since Lebanon was dragged...

Next Post

Major Test of First Advanced Military Communications Satellite

Latest Defense News

US Navy evacuates virus-struck aircraft carrier Roosevelt

US military ‘not ready’ to escort tankers through Hormuz Strait

March 12, 2026
Israel cancels leave for combat units after Iran consulate strike

US says Iran campaign cost $11 billion in six days

March 12, 2026
US moves closer to retaliation over hacking as cyber woes grow

Cyberattack Disrupts Operations at MedTech Giant Stryker

March 11, 2026
Lebanon says Israeli strike kills 3 journalists

Israel strikes central Beirut as Lebanon death toll tops 630

March 11, 2026

Patriot missile defense system deployed in central Turkey

March 10, 2026
Iran unveils ballistic missile, ‘new generation’ engines

Iran says missile attacks to continue, US talks ‘not on agenda’

March 10, 2026

Defense Forum Discussions

  • Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates
  • Middle East Defence & Security
  • Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
  • Indonesia: 'green water navy'
  • German Bundeswehr
  • Royal Netherlands Navy
  • Indonesian Aero News
  • Australian Army Discussions and Updates
  • Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) News and Discussions
  • NATO Airbus A330 Taker KC-30A MRTT Multinational MRTT Fleet T-057 takeoff at RAF Fairford
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com