Friday, July 1, 2022
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result

Iran’s Nuclear Future: US Policy Choices

by RAND
June 9, 2011
in Nuclear Weapons News
3 min read
0
Iran test-fires medium-range Sejil missile
14
VIEWS

Dissuading Iran from developing nuclear weapons faces major obstacles, but it’s too soon to give up trying as it may still be possible to influence the outcome of Iran’s internal political debate, according to a RAND Corporation study issued today.

The study, “Iran’s Nuclear Future: Critical U.S. Policy Choices,” describes the complex considerations underlying future U.S. policy options in responding to Iran’s evolving nuclear program. It also assesses the potential effectiveness of each policy option and concludes that difficult policy trade-offs will be required.

“Iran’s national security interests — the survival of the regime, the protection of its homeland and its goal of expanding its regional influence — are unlikely to change,” said Lynn E. Davis, the lead author of the study and a senior political scientist at RAND, a nonprofit research organization. “The challenge for the United States is to influence how the Iranian leadership pursues these interests, for they could provide reasons for acquiring nuclear weapons.”

The study details three policy options to dissuade Iran from developing nuclear weapons: apply broad-based economic sanctions on the country or specific sanctions that target banks and businesses of the Revolutionary Guards; apply military pressure by training for conventional attacks against Iran’s nuclear facilities and expanding regional missile defense systems; and offer incentives not to build nuclear weapons by lowering the perception of the U.S. military threat in Iran and easing economic sanctions.

Researchers acknowledge that incentives are a two-edged sword, as they could reward Iran for intransigence and send the wrong signal to other potential proliferators. Moreover, incentives are not politically popular in the United States.

The study also details a variety of U.S. approaches to deterring an Iranian attack against U.S. military forces in the Middle East should Iran develop nuclear weapons. Researchers find that traditional threats of punishment or denial may be problematic and so an approach to manage escalation in a conventional conflict needs to be considered.

As the United States will need to find ways to influence Iran to achieve its nuclear dissuasion and deterrence goals, the study offers three integrated approaches, each with its own perspective, costs and benefits:

  • Iran responds only to pressure, and so the United States needs to raise the costs to Iran by expanding economic sanctions as well as conventional offensive and defensive military capabilities. This could undermine factions that could oppose the development of nuclear weapons within Iran and it is unlikely to be supported by U.S. partners in the region until Iran is a nuclear power.
  • Iran responds to the prospect of losing gains, not threats, and so the U.S. needs to deny benefits to Iran through targeted economic sanctions and the build-up of regional missile defenses and offensive strike capabilities. The United States’ partners are likely to support this approach, but it is somewhat undermined by its uncertain military feasibility.
  • Iran’s sense of vulnerability motivates its behavior, and so the United States needs to reduce the threat to Iran by relaxing economic sanctions and focusing on managing escalation in a potential conflict with Iran. This could bolster the efforts of those within Iran who oppose their government’s nuclear ambitions, but is unlikely to gather support from U.S. partners or the U.S. public.

U.S. decision-makers will thus face policy choices at each stage in the future evolution of Iran’s nuclear program. “Making those choices is needed so as to send clear signals to Iranian leaders of the United States’ intentions and make it easier to gain the support of U.S. partners in the Middle East,” Davis said. “It is also crucial to gaining the support of Congress and the American people.”

[download id=”56″ format=”1″]

Tags: irannuclear weaponspolicyRAND
Previous Post

Spain to have Dual Observation Satellite for both Military and Civilian Use

Next Post

Eight soldiers, 10 Taliban dead in Pakistan raid

Related Posts

Defense, Energy Experts Aid China’s Nuclear Security

Russian gas threat revives German nuclear power debate

June 23, 2022

Germany should extend the lifetime of its nuclear plants to avoid an "extreme scenario" in which a Russian gas stop...

Putin to oversee Russian ‘strategic’ missile drills

World headed for new era of nuclear rearmament: SIPRI

June 13, 2022

The number of nuclear weapons in the world is set to rise in the coming decade after 35 years of...

Next Post
US Must Help Pakistan Beat Insurgency, Officials Say

Eight soldiers, 10 Taliban dead in Pakistan raid

Latest Defense News

Joint military forces kick off Cope North 2020

Biden says US ‘should sell’ F-16 Fighter Jets to Turkey

June 30, 2022
China offers to mediate Horn of Africa disputes

NATO wary of Russian, Chinese ‘gains’ on southern flank

June 30, 2022
F-35A Lightning II Fighter Jet

Greece formalizes request for US-made F-35 fighter jets: PM

June 30, 2022
Franco-German treaty a step toward ‘European army’: Merkel

Relief and concern in Sweden after NATO deal with Turkey

June 30, 2022
Jordan to Buy Guided Multiple Launch Rocket Systems

Norway to send rocket launchers to Ukraine

June 30, 2022

Britain boosts military aid to Ukraine

June 30, 2022

Defense Forum Discussions

  • RMAF Future; need opinions
  • New Zealand Army
  • Svenska Flygvapnet/Swedish Air Force
  • German Airbus H145M SAR Helicopter Winching at Koksijde
  • ADF General discussion thread
  • NZDF General discussion thread
  • US Navy News and updates
  • General Naval News
  • The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread
  • Why ASEAN matters - in the era of great power competition
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com