Thursday, March 23, 2023
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result

DoD Suspension and Debarment: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly

by Project on Government Oversight
August 11, 2011
in Defense Geopolitics News
3 min read
0
A New Era for the US Defense Market
14
VIEWS

The Department of Defense Inspector General (DoD IG) released the results of its audit of the suspension and debarment (S&D) process at the Services (Army, Navy, and Air Force) and the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA).

Incredibly, this is the first time DoD IG has reviewed the Pentagon’s suspension and debarment process in nearly two decades. It should therefore come as no surprise that the audit found much room for improvement.

The purpose of suspension and debarment is to ensure the federal government conducts business only with responsible contractors. Suspended and debarred companies and individuals are not allowed to bid on or receive new federal contracts or subcontracts. Their names are entered into a database called the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), which contracting officials are required to check after the opening of bids and again immediately before awarding contracts.

Here’s a summary of what DoD IG found:

The Good…

S&D procedures at the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) were “timely” and “effective.” Service and DLA contracting officials were entering the names of excluded parties into the EPLS about 1.7 days after imposing suspension or debarment, well under the 5-day limit prescribed in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR).

The Bad…
The Army, Navy, and Air Force did not suspend or debar nearly as many contractors based on poor contract performance as the DLA. The Services suspended or debarred poor performers less than 10 percent of the time, while the DLA did so more than 60 percent of the time. The Services’ contracting personnel also had less involvement in—and less familiarity with—the S&D process than their DLA counterparts.

The Ugly…
Although the Services and DLA were checking the EPLS prior to awarding contracts, they awarded 17 contracts worth about $600,000 to 8 suspended or debarred contractors. The Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Headquarters awarded almost three quarters of that to one contractor, Sumrall Family Enterprises, after it was suspended by the Air Force and placed on the EPLS. (According to its current EPLS record, the company was debarred last year for a period of five years. The backstory of this incident is described in this Air Force memorandum.)

Appendix B of the report lists all of the contractors that received taxpayer money from the Department of Defense and other federal agencies after being suspended or debarred. As you can see, some of those contracts were awarded long after the company or individual was placed on the EPLS.

DoD IG blames this on the EPLS’s unreliable search engine, which POGO has written and testified about in the past. Occasionally, contracting officials receive no results from EPLS searches because of input errors. If they do not enter the contractor name in the search field exactly the right way, including punctuation, the search will yield no results and the official will erroneously conclude the contractor is eligible to receive new contracts. It was more than two years ago when the Government Accountability Office (GAO) documented the exact same EPLS glitches, which resulted in at least 25 instances when suspended and debarred companies and individuals were awarded millions of dollars in new federal contracts. The names of these companies and individuals are posted here.

It seems GAO’s recommendations in that 2009 report as to ways to fix EPLS fell on deaf ears. We hope DoD IG’s recommendations get better results. The General Services Administration (GSA), the agency responsible for managing and maintaining the EPLS, is in the process of updating and improving the EPLS with the help of IBM, a company that briefly found itself listed in the EPLS after being suspended by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 2008.

Tags: air forceArmy & Security Forces NewsauditbudgetcontractsNavy Newsreform
Previous Post

Army readies for next major network exercise

Next Post

Air Force Completes Developmental Test of Laser-Guided Maverick

Related Posts

Russian navy in show of strength with 26 new ships this year

Russian navy ‘repelled’ drone attack on Crimea port

March 23, 2023

The Russian navy "repelled" a drone attack on the port of Sevastopol in Moscow-annexed Crimea early Wednesday, officials said. Defence...

China will ‘never commit to abandoning the use of force’ on Taiwan: Xi

China diplomatic offensive lays down new challenge for US

March 22, 2023

Few expect Chinese President Xi Jinping's diplomacy to yield breakthroughs on the Ukraine war. But in Washington, there are fears...

Next Post
Testing Begins on Laser-Guided Maverick Missile Components

Air Force Completes Developmental Test of Laser-Guided Maverick

Latest Defense News

Russian navy in show of strength with 26 new ships this year

Russian navy ‘repelled’ drone attack on Crimea port

March 23, 2023
Officials provide details on building the Space Force, its structure, and operating imperatives

Reagan’s ‘Star Wars’ at 40: Battle of the satellites

March 23, 2023
China will ‘never commit to abandoning the use of force’ on Taiwan: Xi

China diplomatic offensive lays down new challenge for US

March 22, 2023
Hwasong-17 ICBM

North Korea fires ‘long-range’ missile as S. Korea president heads to Japan

March 16, 2023
North Korea fires multiple suspected cruise missiles

North Korea fires two ballistic missiles, Seoul says

March 14, 2023
Australia to get nuclear submarines in new US, British partnership

Australia to buy US nuclear subs in ambitious new pact

March 14, 2023

Defense Forum Discussions

  • The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread
  • Italian Air Force Update and Topic
  • Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates
  • Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
  • Indian Navy Discussions and Updates
  • Russia and the West
  • Warbirds (Historical, Veteran & Vintage Military Aircraft)
  • Australian Army Discussions and Updates
  • Ukrainian - Russian War Memes.
  • Indonesian Aero News
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com