Thursday, February 2, 2023
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result

Army Reserve prepares for post-conflict requirements

by American Forces Press Service
January 14, 2010
in Army News
3 min read
0
14
VIEWS

WASHINGTON: After World War I, a hit single begged the question, “How do you keep them down on the farm after they’ve seen Paree?”

With the drawdown of U.S. forces under way in Iraq and plans announced to begin reducing forces in Afghanistan after July 2011, Lt. Gen. Jack C. Stultz, the Army Reserve chief, is facing a similar quandary.

His big question is: “How do you keep the Army Reserve relevant, and its Soldiers motivated, if it’s allowed to revert from an operational reserve to its pre-war strategic-reserve status?

Stultz told an assembly of reserve Soldiers today that he wants the Army Reserve to continue supporting the total force and to keep its combat-hardened capabilities sharp after the current conflicts end.

With proven battlefield successes and an Army force-generation process instilling predictability into training and deployment cycles, an operational Army Reserve can continue to fulfill critical military missions, he said.

“There are a lot of requirements out there today from all the [combatant commands] that are going unmet because of the demand in Iraq and Afghanistan,” Stultz said. “And I think, long-term, if we put them in the global requirements system, there will be plenty of opportunities for reserve-component Soldiers to go do things in the future, even with a drawdown in Iraq and Afghanistan.”

With a heavy concentration on combat-support and combat-service-support capabilities, the Army Reserve has a lot to contribute toward combatant commanders’ security cooperation engagements, he said.

Stultz pointed to medical and engineering exercises in which the Army Reserve regularly engages within U.S. Southern Command’s area of responsibility.

Navy Adm. James Stavridis, U.S. European Command and NATO commander who previously served as Southcom commander, said these medical engagements “do more than anything else we do to enhance relationships with the United States, and the way people in those countries view us,” Stultz said.

Rather than limiting these missions to the current two to three weeks, Army reservists could serve longer tours, Stultz said, all within their regularly scheduled force-generation cycles.

The Army introduced the force-generation training and deployment cycle concept in 2006 to ensure there’s always a pool of trained, equipped and deployment-ready troops. For the Army Reserve, the plan means reservists can expect to deploy for up to a year once every five years.

“What I would like to be able to say in the future is, plan a 12-month engagement,” Stultz said, with Army Reserve medical units pulling longer tours – potentially 90 to 120 days longer — to support it. “We could really do a first-class support mission,” he said, possibly rotating various reserve units through for its full duration.

Citing potential missions within U.S. European Command, U.S. Africa Command and U.S. Pacific Command, the general noted “a huge potential to really leverage a lot of capabilities – from logistics to engineers to civil affairs to medical to you name it – to have a huge impact out there.”

The plan would enable Army reservists to maintain their skills, Stultz said, while giving them the predictability of knowing they would be on tap for deployments only one in every five years.

Stultz said his most recent Thanksgiving and Christmas visits to Iraq and Afghanistan reaffirmed how far the Army Reserve has come as an operational force.

“When you get out there in Iraq and Afghanistan and see U.S. Army Reserve units in action, they can hold their own with anybody on the battlefield,” he said. “And commanders across the force say ‘I can’t tell any difference.’… In terms of performance of the unit, they are as good as anybody else.”

The key after the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts will be to maintain those capabilities on a sustained basis, he said.

While the leadership has a big interest in maximizing Army Reserve capabilities, Stultz said, the Soldiers themselves want to ensure they remain relevant.

“The Soldiers we have signing up today for the Army Reserve are signing up to go do something. They are not signing up for a one-weekend-a-month, two-weeks-in-the summertime Army,” he said. “If we go back to a strategic reserve, with tiered readiness, I think we will have a heck of a time retaining those Soldiers, because that is not what they want.”

Tags: afghanistanarmy reserveconflictiraqNATOwar on terrorworld war
Previous Post

Taiwan defends US missile deal

Next Post

Pakistan warns against ‘massive’ Indian arms build-up

Related Posts

Indonesia Orders Additional CAESAR Artillery Systems

France to send more mobile artillery to Ukraine

February 1, 2023

France will ship 12 more Caesar truck-mounted howitzers and fresh air defence equipment to Ukraine to bolster the fight against...

Leopard tanks to arrive in Ukraine around late March: Germany

Leopard tanks to arrive in Ukraine around late March: Germany

January 27, 2023

Leopard tanks pledged by Germany to help Ukraine repel Russia's invasion will arrive in "late March, early April", Defence Minister...

Next Post

Pakistan warns against 'massive' Indian arms build-up

Latest Defense News

Eurofighter Touts Typhoon Capabilities to Poland At Air Show

UK court examines legality of resuming Saudi arms sales

February 1, 2023
If US DoD Wants #ArtificialIntelligence In Its Future, It Must Start Now

AI voice tool ‘misused’ as deepfakes flood web forum

February 1, 2023
Japan defence ministry seeks $50 billion budget

NATO chief hails Japan plans to expand defence spending

February 1, 2023
Indonesia Orders Additional CAESAR Artillery Systems

France to send more mobile artillery to Ukraine

February 1, 2023
USAF F-16 fleet undergoing largest modification work in history

Poland not in talks to send F-16s to Ukraine

February 1, 2023
Turkey says NATO summit ‘not the deadline’ for Finland, Sweden talks

Hungary blasts Sweden’s ‘stupidity’ on NATO row with Turkey

February 1, 2023

Defense Forum Discussions

  • ADF General discussion thread
  • Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates
  • What are you reading at the moment?
  • NZDF General discussion thread
  • The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread
  • Russia and the West
  • Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
  • Indonesia: 'green water navy'
  • United States Marine Corps
  • China - Geostrategic & Geopolitical.
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com