Welcome to DefenceTalk.com Forum!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Russian Army/Ground Forces Discussion and Updates

Discussion in 'Army & Security Forces' started by Jack Johnson, Jan 6, 2012.

Share This Page

  1. Jack Johnson

    Jack Johnson New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2010
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
    Russian Tank development - did I get it right?

    I have some problems understanding the russian tank development...Thats how I think it goes:

    (1) First T-54, T-55 and T-62 as mediocre, but reliable and mass produced tanks.

    (2) After that, a policy of two tanks at the same time, a high quality one and a cheap mass produced one. The high quality tank is the T-64, the mass produced one the T-72

    (3) The T-64 gets replaced by the T-80, the T-72 is still kept in service because he was introduced later.

    (4) The T-72 is developed further into the T-90, the new replacement for the T-80 is still vague, many different concepts (T-95, Black Eagle etc. etc.)

    (5) Because of monetary concerns, and a higher export demand, the two tank policy is dropped. Only the T-90 is kept in production, and is from now on russias MBT.

    (6) T-72, T-80 and T-90 are continiung their service until ~2025, when they all are supposed to be replaced by one new MBT.


    Is this about right...?
     
  2. Feanor

    Feanor Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2008
    Messages:
    15,070
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Under your bed. No seriously, take a look.
    They weren't mediocre, for their time. Remember the T-54 entered production in 1947, right after WWII. It was a very good tank.

    The T-64 was first by a notable margin. The T-72 was a replacement for the T-54/55 and T-62.

    No. The T-64, T-80, and T-72 are in production at the same time for quite a while. The T-64 wasn't getting replaced at the time the T-80 came out.

    Currently there is no replacement for the T-80. All MBTs will get replaced by the Armata post 2015.

    Not just MBTs, the Armata is supposed to be the new heavy tracked chassis for all vehicles, including a new heavy APC/IFV, a chassis for the TOS-1, a tank-evacuator vehicle, etc.
     
  3. Jack Johnson

    Jack Johnson New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2010
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
  4. Feanor

    Feanor Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2008
    Messages:
    15,070
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Under your bed. No seriously, take a look.
    Basically, yes. Though it ignores the JS-3 and T-10 that were heavy tanks in production post WWII.
     
  5. CheeZe

    CheeZe Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    US
    This has gotten me curious. Where can one find some specs and dev info for the Armata? A google search is only turning up news articles.
     
  6. Feanor

    Feanor Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2008
    Messages:
    15,070
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Under your bed. No seriously, take a look.
    You can't.

    It's supposed to be a cheaper to produce variant of the Object 195, with probably tie ins from the features added to the T-90MS. So imagine an unmanned turret config, 2-3 man crew in either individual armored capsules or a single armored capsule for all, possibly a bustle-stored ammo rack with blow-out panels, panoramic sights, extremely advanced FCS, possibly French thermals (since Russian MIC doesn't seem to have anything to offer, though it remains to be seen). Granted it's all speculation, so I'd wait and see until they release something concrete.
     
  7. NICO

    NICO New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2010
    Messages:
    208
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    AZ, USA
    I don't think I would call T54/T55 mediocre since weren't they derived from war time T34?, which was a very good tank. What's incredible is that some T55s were noticed during Libyan conflict in 2011, now that's longevity.
     
  8. Feanor

    Feanor Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2008
    Messages:
    15,070
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Under your bed. No seriously, take a look.
    T-55s are still in front line service in quite a few countries. As recently as 2011 Uganda purchased iirc 90 T-55 from Russia second hand. They were actually in production until iirc 1977 in the USSR, mainly for export customers. The T-55 was a very good design for it's time, and for many countries with limited budgets, and only low-tech opponents the T-55 is still a viable MBT, especially given the near scrap-metal prices.
     
  9. Waylander

    Waylander Defense Professional Verified Defense Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,940
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein
    I don't expect the Armata to reduce the crew to 2. Much too much overload for the crew, commanding a tank is still a full time job. Engage in a heavy (mobile) firefight with multiple enemies and your situational awareness goes down the toilet when the TC has to do the tracking and engaging. Not to talk of the platoon and company commanders being able to lead their units...

    IMHO the time for 2 men crews isn't there for some time without compromising critical combat power, not in the west and not in the east.
     
  10. T.C.P da Devil

    T.C.P da Devil New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2009
    Messages:
    614
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Dhaka,Bangladesh
    So how many different variants of Armata is proposed?

    Also a bit off topic, but roughly how many Tos-1s are in service?
     
  11. Feanor

    Feanor Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2008
    Messages:
    15,070
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Under your bed. No seriously, take a look.
    Supposedly there will be: MBT, Heavy IFV (a completely new project), Heavy APC (replacement for BMO-T in RKhBZ units most likely, and for Tank Bdes), SP Arty (replacing Msta-S, 2S5 and 2S3, but not 2S1), evacuator vehicle (BREM-1 and BTS replacement).

    Also possible, although not terribly likely, a bridge-layer, an engineer vehicle chassis (to replace the IMR-2), a mine-clearing vehicle (to replace the BMR).

    Just to be clear, Armata is the name of the OKR for the new heavy platform. It is not the name of the MBT. The MBT has an object number which we do not know.

    No idea, to be honest, but a decent number. They're in service with RKhBZ units. Iirc the ones in service now are TOS-1A variants.

    I suppose it remains to be seen. I don't disagree with your assessment. To be honest I really wish they would show object 195 to the public. After all the project is no longer MoD funded, and UVZ is still supposedly completing the development in hopes of securing an export contract. It would certainly give us a very good idea of what to expect from the Armata.
     
  12. CheeZe

    CheeZe Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    US
    Do you know what the design philosophy for the MBT is? Tank v Tank combat? Infantry support? Will it be designed with urban combat as part of its mission parameters?
     
  13. lucinator

    lucinator New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2011
    Messages:
    167
    Likes Received:
    0
    MBT's in general or the new russian one?
     
  14. CheeZe

    CheeZe Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    US
    The new Russian one.
     
  15. Feanor

    Feanor Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2008
    Messages:
    15,070
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Under your bed. No seriously, take a look.
    It will be used just like current MBTs both as a tool of operational-level mobility, and as tactical direct-fire support for Motor-Rifles units. The Land Forces force org. reflects this, with 4 Tank Brigades, and several dozen Motor-Rifle Brigades with a tank btln in each.
     
  16. Klaus

    Klaus New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2011
    Messages:
    224
    Likes Received:
    0
    Which MBTs are in service at the moment? Three years ago there still were some T 54 and T 62 (in reserve units?). As the GPV 2011-2020 calls for a reduction of the number of MBTs to 2500 and the T 90 is still in production, whill there be only T 80s and T 90s left then (of the current types)?
     
  17. Feanor

    Feanor Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2008
    Messages:
    15,070
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Under your bed. No seriously, take a look.
    The last T-54s, T-55s, and T-62s were retired iirc 2009-10. As late as 2009 T-62s were in active service with the former 42nd MRD, and T-55s with the 18th Mg-Arty. In 2011 T-64s were retired completely.

    So currently we have T-72, T-80, and T-90.
     
  18. Klaus

    Klaus New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2011
    Messages:
    224
    Likes Received:
    0
    I understand. So will the T 72 also be retired completely until 2020
    or are there plans to upgrade some of the remaining?
     
  19. Feanor

    Feanor Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2008
    Messages:
    15,070
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Under your bed. No seriously, take a look.
    Some of the remaining are being upgraded right now with thermals, K-5, new FCS, and iirc a new engine.

    T-80s are not being modernized, and instead being slowly (very slowly) phased out when their resource runs out. So if a tank type is eliminated by 2020, my money is on the T-80.
     
  20. Sandhi Yudha

    Sandhi Yudha Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2007
    Messages:
    547
    Likes Received:
    3
    So after 2020, we can expect that the Russian Army has to use the T-90 and the 50 years old T-72......
    :(