Thursday, March 26, 2026
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result
Home Defence & Military News Defense Geopolitics News

"Agreement" on Transfer of U.S. Military Base Concluded under Coercion

by Editor
October 27, 2003
in Defense Geopolitics News
2 min read
0
14
VIEWS

KCNA, Pyongyang, October 25 (KCNA) — It was brought to light that the United States illegally concluded the “Agreement on the Transfer of the U.S. Army Base in Ryongsan” in 1990 and, after that, deliberately put pressure on the south Korean “government” to “legalize” it. South Korean Yonhap News disclosed the truth on the basis of a document of the then “Security Planning Board” titled “Necessary measures for the implementation of the agreement on the transfer of the U.S. army base in Ryongsan,” obtained from An Yong Gun, a “national assemblyman” from the New United Party.

According to the document dated May, 1991, the “South Korea-U.S. Status of Forces Agreement” stipulated that the agreement would come into force only when it was signed by Pan Ki Mun, director of the American Affairs Bureau of the south Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the deputy commander of the U.S. forces in south Korea, who were the representatives of both sides at the joint committee of the SOFA. But the U.S. let the south Korean minister of National Defense and the commander of the U.S. forces in south Korea, not responsible for the conclusion of the agreement, sign it, disregarding such procedure in order to avoid the trouble that might surface in the course of consultation. When there was a strong assertion within the south Korean “government” that the agreement was illegal and invalid as it bore no signature of the south Korean side's representative the U.S. instructed the deputy commander of the U.S. forces in south Korea to force Pan Ki Mun to sign the unilaterally drafted paper which said that he recognized the legality of the agreement in May 1991.
This U.S. arrogant act is touching off bitter indignation among the south Korean people.

Previous Post

Uncle Sam keeps SAIC on call for top tasks

Next Post

GD Wins $100M Contract Modification For TRIDENT/SSGN Systems

Related Posts

Israel cancels leave for combat units after Iran consulate strike

US says Iran campaign cost $11 billion in six days

March 12, 2026

The opening week of the war against Iran cost the United States more than $11.3 billion, lawmakers were told in...

Lebanon says Israeli strike kills 3 journalists

Israel strikes central Beirut as Lebanon death toll tops 630

March 11, 2026

Israel carried out a strike in the heart of Beirut on Wednesday for a second time since Lebanon was dragged...

Next Post

GD Wins $100M Contract Modification For TRIDENT/SSGN Systems

Latest Defense News

US needs top cyber coordinator, better hacker ‘deterrence’

‘Digital fog of war’ around Iranian cyberattacks

March 13, 2026
US military says aircraft crash in Iraq killed 4 crew members

US military says aircraft crash in Iraq killed 4 crew members

March 13, 2026
Northrop Grumman moves to boost B-21 Raider output

Northrop Grumman moves to boost B-21 Raider output

March 13, 2026
US Navy evacuates virus-struck aircraft carrier Roosevelt

US military ‘not ready’ to escort tankers through Hormuz Strait

March 12, 2026
Israel cancels leave for combat units after Iran consulate strike

US says Iran campaign cost $11 billion in six days

March 12, 2026
US moves closer to retaliation over hacking as cyber woes grow

Cyberattack Disrupts Operations at MedTech Giant Stryker

March 11, 2026

Defense Forum Discussions

  • The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread
  • European Union, member states and Agencies
  • Middle East Defence & Security
  • KAI KF-21
  • Indonesia: 'green water navy'
  • Royal Canadian Navy Discussions and updates
  • Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
  • International Army News Thread
  • Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates
  • USAF News and Discussion
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com