Tuesday, February 7, 2023
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result

US experts propose minimal deterrence nuclear targeting policy

by RIA Novosti
April 16, 2009
in Nuclear Weapons News
2 min read
0
14
VIEWS

MOSCOW: A respected U.S. think tank has released a report calling for fundamental changes to Washington’s nuclear war planning.

The Federation of American Scientists and Natural Resources Defense Council has published a study entitled From Counterforce to Minimal Deterrence: A New Nuclear Policy on the Path Toward Eliminating Nuclear Weapons.

It recommends abandoning the decades-old “counterforce” doctrine and replacing it with a new and much less ambitious targeting policy that the authors call “minimal deterrence.”

The report posits that current nuclear doctrine is “an artifact of the Cold War that needs to be fundamentally altered” and a minimal deterrence policy should be adopted “as a transitional step on a path to zero nuclear weapons.”

It says a new targeting category and policy, termed “infrastructure targeting,” would focus on “a series of targets that are crucial to a nation’s modern economy, for example, electrical, oil, and energy nodes, transportation hubs.”

“A minimal nuclear deterrence policy and posture with infrastructure targeting does not require nuclear forces to be on alert, to be configured for preemption, or to even retaliate quickly,” the study said.

The report, released last Wednesday, has so far not provoked much reaction in Russia. However, earlier today, a Russian military expert commented to the effect that any potential “retargeting” would only erode trust between Moscow and Washington.

Col. Gen. Viktor Yesin (Ret.), chief of staff of the Russian Strategic Missile Forces in 1991-93, said it would be impossible to monitor the retargeting of U.S. nuclear missiles on infrastructure in Russia.

“They [the Federation of American Scientists] have put forward the idea of retargeting nuclear warheads from densely populated areas to major elements of infrastructure. Now let them explain how we are supposed to verify this,” the expert said.

He added there were no credible verification mechanisms on either side.

Yesin said he was worried that the FAS “has not proposed any cuts in defensive armaments,” suggesting that “there must be a snag here.”

Tags: deterrencenuclearpolicy
Previous Post

Gates Aims to Speed Delivery of Helicopter Pilots, Crews

Next Post

New Navigation System for M-346 Advanced Trainer Aircraft

Related Posts

Putin to oversee Russian ‘strategic’ missile drills

US says Russia not complying with last remaining nuclear treaty

February 1, 2023

The United States said Tuesday that Russia was not complying with New START, the last remaining arms control treaty between...

DoD Aims to Shield Warfighters From Novel Biological Agents

DoD Aims to Shield Warfighters From Novel Biological Agents

January 10, 2023

The Department of Defense is modernizing its approach for developing medical countermeasures to protect warfighters from novel biological agents. This...

Next Post

New Navigation System for M-346 Advanced Trainer Aircraft

Latest Defense News

Air Defense Systems, Long-Range Fires Capability to be Sent to Ukraine

Air Defense Systems, Long-Range Fires Capability to be Sent to Ukraine

February 4, 2023
Beijing accuses NATO of exaggerating ‘China threat theory’

Majority of Finns want to join NATO before Sweden: poll

February 3, 2023
China, US defence ministers to hold talks in Singapore

Pentagon tracking Chinese spy balloon over US

February 3, 2023
Eurofighter Touts Typhoon Capabilities to Poland At Air Show

UK court examines legality of resuming Saudi arms sales

February 1, 2023
If US DoD Wants #ArtificialIntelligence In Its Future, It Must Start Now

AI voice tool ‘misused’ as deepfakes flood web forum

February 1, 2023
Japan defence ministry seeks $50 billion budget

NATO chief hails Japan plans to expand defence spending

February 1, 2023

Defense Forum Discussions

  • The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread
  • Indonesian Aero News
  • Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
  • Australian Army Discussions and Updates
  • Warships at Piraeus , Greece
  • Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates
  • American US Army 12CAB Apaches at Gilze-Rijen Air Base [second film online]
  • Military Aviation News and Discussion
  • NZDF General discussion thread
  • USAF News and Discussion
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com