Sunday, March 15, 2026
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result
Home Defence & Military News Defense Geopolitics News War News

US dismisses report on Iraq toll but author defends research

by Editor
October 12, 2006
in War News
2 min read
0
14
VIEWS

,

US President George W. Bush dismissed as “not credible” an independent US study which estimated that 655,000 Iraqis had died in Iraq since the 2003 US invasion.

But the study author stood by the findings, which estimated that one Iraqi in 40 had died as a result of the conflict. The study compared the death rates from the period before the war to the period from March 2003 to June 2006.

“I do know that a lot of innocent people have died, and it troubles me and grieves me,” Bush said at a White House press conference.

But the president added that he and his top military advisers believe “the methodology is pretty well discredited.”

The US president in the past has estimated the number of Iraqi deaths to be closer to 30,000, and reaffirmed that number Wednesday.

“I stand by the figure,” he said. “Six hundred thousand or whatever they guessed at … it's not credible.”

Echoing Bush's comments, the top US commander in Iraq, General George Casey, also dismissed the study as lacking credibility, saying the highest estimate he had seen was 50,000 civilians dead.

Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said the US military did not collect data on civilian deaths and said the Iraqi ministry of health was “probably the best authority.”

The Iraqi ministry's last estimate put the civilian death toll at 128,000. A spokesman for the Iraqi government called the independent study “exaggerated.”

But the author of the study, Gilbert Burnham of the Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, defended his findings as reliable and based on methods commonly used by researchers in the health field.

“We use a cluster survey sampling methodology and this is something that is widely used in international health,” said Burnham, co-director of the center for refugees and disaster response at Johns Hopkins.

The survey method is used to confirm government figures for health indicators and “it's increasingly used to look at mortality rate in conflict,” Burnham said.

“The confidence interval is a range within which we are 95 percent certain we have the correct answer,” he said.

The study is to be published Thursday by the British journal The Lancet.

In October 2004, a paper also published in The Lancet calculated that almost 100,000 deaths had occurred in Iraq between March 2003 and September 2004 as a result of violence and heart attack and aggravated health problems.

Updating this, Burnham led a team that sought to make an estimate of deaths in the post-invasion period from March 2003 to June 2006.

The researchers randomly selected 47 sites across Iraq, comprising 1,849 households and 12,801 people.

Interviewers asked householders about births, deaths and migration and if there had been a death since January 2002 and, if so, asked to see a death certificate to note the cause.

Of the 629 deaths recorded, 547, or 87 percent, were in the post-invasion period.

Extrapolated across the country, 654,965 premature deaths — 2.5 percent of the population — have occurred since March 2003, the study says.

“We recorded what people told us in the survey … people are not making up death. In fact they are more likely to under-report death, especially those who are involved in the conflict.”

Previous Post

Only A Matter Of Time Before North Korea Could Attack Say Japanese Analysts

Next Post

At least 85 killed, over 400 wounded in major Sri Lanka battle

Related Posts

Israel cancels leave for combat units after Iran consulate strike

US says Iran campaign cost $11 billion in six days

March 12, 2026

The opening week of the war against Iran cost the United States more than $11.3 billion, lawmakers were told in...

Lebanon says Israeli strike kills 3 journalists

Israel strikes central Beirut as Lebanon death toll tops 630

March 11, 2026

Israel carried out a strike in the heart of Beirut on Wednesday for a second time since Lebanon was dragged...

Next Post

At least 85 killed, over 400 wounded in major Sri Lanka battle

Latest Defense News

US needs top cyber coordinator, better hacker ‘deterrence’

‘Digital fog of war’ around Iranian cyberattacks

March 13, 2026
US military says aircraft crash in Iraq killed 4 crew members

US military says aircraft crash in Iraq killed 4 crew members

March 13, 2026
Northrop Grumman moves to boost B-21 Raider output

Northrop Grumman moves to boost B-21 Raider output

March 13, 2026
US Navy evacuates virus-struck aircraft carrier Roosevelt

US military ‘not ready’ to escort tankers through Hormuz Strait

March 12, 2026
Israel cancels leave for combat units after Iran consulate strike

US says Iran campaign cost $11 billion in six days

March 12, 2026
US moves closer to retaliation over hacking as cyber woes grow

Cyberattack Disrupts Operations at MedTech Giant Stryker

March 11, 2026

Defense Forum Discussions

  • Middle East Defence & Security
  • Australian Army Discussions and Updates
  • The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread
  • Indonesia: 'green water navy'
  • Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force Thread
  • RSN capabilities
  • Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
  • Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates
  • Looking for good book resources
  • USAF News and Discussion
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com