Saturday, July 19, 2025
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result
Home Defence & Military News Defense Geopolitics News

Officials Face Tough Choices on Budget, Afghanistan, Gates Says

by Editor
February 12, 2009
in Defense Geopolitics News
2 min read
0
14
VIEWS

US Department of Defense,

WASHINGTON: Discussions within the administration about the fiscal 2010 defense budget have been cordial and productive, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said today, but department leaders are prepared to make tough choices. Gates also spoke about the White House-ordered Afghanistan strategic review.

Office of Management and Budget officials said the Defense Department budget’s “top line” will be released in the next few weeks, with the complete request coming in April.

“Irrespective of what the budget top line ultimately is … this department faces difficult choices among competing priorities and programs,” Gates said. “I believe we must make those choices.”

The secretary said leaders are looking at the budget in terms of efficiencies to be realized, programs with serious execution issues, and strategic reshaping to make sure the budget reflects the need to balance current and future capabilities and the president's priorities.

Since the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq began, the Defense Department has received supplemental appropriations to cover their cost. Last year, Congress made it clear that the predictable war costs should be placed in the base budget. “The department’s budget proposal put together last year with a much higher top line was an attempt to begin this process,” Gates said.

But given the economic environment, it will not be possible to do this as fast as the department would like, the secretary said. “Nonetheless, there is broad agreement that’s the direction we should go, and I'm confident that over time we will get there,” he told reporters.

The White House has ordered a strategic review for Afghanistan. The commander of NATO and U.S. forces there, Army Gen. David D. McKiernan, has asked for more military capabilities. The U.S. contribution would be between 20,000 and 30,000 additional forces. The review will not be finished until April, Gates said, but that does not mean deployments to the country will halt.

“There is a realization that some decisions have to be made before the strategic review is completed,” he said, “if only because if he does decide to send at least an additional brigade combat team, … the next one to go would need to be notified pretty quickly.”

The secretary said he has made recommendations to Obama on the way forward in Afghanistan. “I think it's a very constructive, deliberative process,” the secretary said. “This is the first time that this president has been asked to deploy large numbers of troops overseas, and it seems to me a thoughtful and deliberate approach to that decision is entirely appropriate.”

Gates said there is no cap to the number of American troops that could go to Afghanistan, but he would be leery of any deployments beyond the number of troops under consideration.

“I worry a lot about the size of the foreign military footprint in Afghanistan,” he said. “Once we have satisfied General McKiernan's request, … then I think and I hope that the strategic review that's under way will sort of point a path forward in terms of what we think the right number or the right size of the foreign military presence in Afghanistan should be.”

Previous Post

RAF's Latest Eye in the Sky Gathers Info on Taliban

Next Post

US drones are based in Pakistan: senator

Related Posts

Trump announces ‘full and immediate’ India-Pakistan ceasefire

Trump announces ‘full and immediate’ India-Pakistan ceasefire

May 10, 2025

US President Donald Trump on Saturday announced a ceasefire agreement between India and Pakistan after days of deadly jet fighter,...

Pakistan says Indian missiles strike air bases as conflict spirals

Pakistan says Indian missiles strike air bases as conflict spirals

May 10, 2025

Pakistan's military on Saturday said India launched another wave of missiles targeting three air bases -- including one on the...

Next Post

US drones are based in Pakistan: senator

Latest Defense News

Britain, Germany jointly developing missiles: ministers

Britain, Germany jointly developing missiles: ministers

May 17, 2025
Trump announces ‘full and immediate’ India-Pakistan ceasefire

Trump announces ‘full and immediate’ India-Pakistan ceasefire

May 10, 2025
Pakistan says Indian missiles strike air bases as conflict spirals

Pakistan says Indian missiles strike air bases as conflict spirals

May 10, 2025
J-10C fighter jet

Pakistan says India has brought neighbours ‘closer to major conflict’

May 9, 2025
North Korea fires multiple suspected cruise missiles

North Korea fires flurry of short-range ballistic missiles

May 9, 2025
China says ‘closely watching’ Ukraine situation after Russian attack

China vows to stand with Russia in face of ‘hegemonic bullying’

May 9, 2025

Defense Forum Discussions

  • Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates
  • Indonesia: 'green water navy'
  • Indonesian Aero News
  • The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread
  • ADF General discussion thread
  • Russia - General Discussion.
  • Royal Canadian Navy Discussions and updates
  • Marine Nationale (French Navy)
  • US Army News and updates general discussion
  • German Navy: Third Combat Support Ship instead of F125-Frigates?
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com