Wednesday, July 9, 2025
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result
Home Defence & Military News Nuclear Weapons News

North Korea Nuclear Agreement Leaves Key Points Unresolved

by Editor
September 21, 2005
in Nuclear Weapons News
2 min read
0
14
VIEWS

Voice of America News , North Korea's demand for a nuclear reactor as a precondition to abandon its nuclear weapons ambitions has dampened the elation that greeted the six-nation agreement signed on Monday.  But the pact was ambiguous on key points, leaving it open to differing interpretations by both sides.

Under the agreement, North Korea agrees to give up any nuclear arms program.  In return, North Korea would get a civilian light water nuclear reactor for power generation. 

But the pact is vague on the timing, saying only that the issue of the reactor would be discussed, as the agreement says, “at the appropriate time.” On Tuesday, North Korea said it wants the reactor before it ends its arms program.

As James Lilley, former U.S. Ambassador to South Korea and China, says, North Korea apparently thinks the “appropriate time” is now.

“They signed on to the agreement that said we would discuss the light water reactor at the appropriate time.  Obviously, this was a fudge.  They think the appropriate time is before they dismantle their program.  We think the appropriate time is after they dismantle their program.  This kind of thing is par for the course with them, to come out with some bombastic, extreme statement to increase their leverage and bargaining position,” said Mr. Lilley.

The United States reaction to the new wrinkle was muted.  State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said in New York that North Korea should, as he put it, “reflect on the agreement that they signed.”

China, which also signed the agreement along with Japan, Russia, South Korea, and the United States, said North Korea was aware of what it signed and called on all parties to implement their commitments in what it termed a “serious manner.”  Japan called the new North Korean statement “unacceptable.”

Joel Wit, a former State Department senior adviser on North Korea, says the agreement is flawed because it does not lay out any road map of steps for each side to take or a timetable.  Mr. Wit, now a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, says North Korea was bound to try to take advantage of such ambiguity.

“Honestly, I think the agreement, while a step forward, is incredibly vague, and doesn't nail down a lot of important issues,” said Mr. Wit.  “So I think the initial reaction to the agreement was really overdone.  I think the administration oversold the agreement.  The press reaction was overdone.  And, in fact, there are enormously important issues that remain to be negotiated.”

Mr. Lilley agrees there is more hard bargaining ahead.  But, he adds, just getting the five nations other than North Korea to agree on an approach to North Korean nuclear disarmament was a victory.

“This was an achievement mainly because we got the five countries other than North Korea to agree on something, and to make it public,” he added.  “This is a beginning, and this is the North Koreans' worst nightmare, to have the five countries work together.  Because if that happens, they haven't got a chance.”

Representatives of the six nations that are party to the agreement are scheduled to meet again in November to work on implementing details of the pact.

Previous Post

Ground-based Midcourse Defense Interceptor Emplaced

Next Post

Tender for Wheeled Armoured Personnel Carriers for the Czech military

Related Posts

EU warns Belarus opening door to Russian nukes after vote

Russia’s updated nuclear ‘red line’ adds uncertainty: experts

November 20, 2024

Russia's new nuclear doctrine reflects its hopes to deter Ukraine's allies from a greater role in the war by establishing...

Russian defence ministry says held fresh nuclear drills

Russian defence ministry says held fresh nuclear drills

October 30, 2024

Russia said Tuesday its army held fresh nuclear drills under the supervision of President Vladimir Putin, who recently called for...

Next Post

Tender for Wheeled Armoured Personnel Carriers for the Czech military

Latest Defense News

Britain, Germany jointly developing missiles: ministers

Britain, Germany jointly developing missiles: ministers

May 17, 2025
Trump announces ‘full and immediate’ India-Pakistan ceasefire

Trump announces ‘full and immediate’ India-Pakistan ceasefire

May 10, 2025
Pakistan says Indian missiles strike air bases as conflict spirals

Pakistan says Indian missiles strike air bases as conflict spirals

May 10, 2025
J-10C fighter jet

Pakistan says India has brought neighbours ‘closer to major conflict’

May 9, 2025
North Korea fires multiple suspected cruise missiles

North Korea fires flurry of short-range ballistic missiles

May 9, 2025
China says ‘closely watching’ Ukraine situation after Russian attack

China vows to stand with Russia in face of ‘hegemonic bullying’

May 9, 2025

Defense Forum Discussions

  • 6th Generation Fighters Projects
  • Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates
  • The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread
  • The Global Hawk
  • What has replaced the SR71?
  • Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
  • ADF General discussion thread
  • Italian Navy Discussions and Updates
  • Middle East Defence & Security
  • Canada Defence Force
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com