Thursday, March 23, 2023
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result

NATO Defends Airstrikes on Libyan Navy Vessels

by German Radio
May 24, 2011
in Navy News
3 min read
0
Qatar flies first sortie enforcing no-fly zone over Libya
14
VIEWS

NATO has defended its decision to bomb eight docked Libyan warships following fears over Gadhafi’s increasing reliance on the navy. NATO asserted that its ongoing airstrikes have successfully weakened Gadhafi’s regime.

NATO has defended its airstrikes on eight docked warships belonging to Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi’s navy after the vessels were bombed in the night to Friday.

In a statement released Friday, NATO said the bombings were part of a series of coordinated precision airstrikes against pro-Gadhafi regime forces in the ports of Tripoli, Al-Khums and Sirte. This included strikes against eight warships stationed in these ports.

NATO also reported that it had intercepted an oil tanker that the alliance had reason to believe was delivering fuel to Gadhafi’s military forces.

Defending the action, military spokesman Mike Bracken told reporters in Brussels that NATO’s command in the western port of Misrata had intercepted boats laying land mines and found an inflatable boat carrying a ton of explosives, capable of sinking another ship.

“Should we have waited until somebody else had been killed or should we have taken action? I suggest we took action to enable us to stop and reduce that risk to the civilian population,” Bracken said.

“Our aim was not to destroy those ships, but to remove their ability to turn their military weapons on the civilian population, humanitarian assistance or NATO vessels,” he added.

NATO had ‘no choice’

Rear-Admiral Russell Harding, deputy commander of the NATO-led air offensive, also asserted the importance of the ongoing airstrikes.

“Given the escalating use of naval assets, NATO had no choice but to take decisive action to protect the civilian population of Libya and NATO forces at sea,” he said.

Harding insisted that all the vessels hit were legitimate military targets with “no civilian utility,” but the Libyan government disputed this, with spokesman Mussa Ibrahim suggesting NATO was trying to scare international shipping firms into avoiding ports held by Gadhafi’s forces. “Whatever the ship that has been hit, it is clearly a message sent by NATO to the international maritime companies not to send any more vessels to Libya,” Ibrahim said.

Libyan officials also took selected journalists to the port in Tripoli where they said six boats – five belonging to the coastguard and a larger naval vessel – had been struck by NATO aircraft. The general manager of the port, Mohammad Ahmad Rashed, said all the vessels had been undergoing maintenance and had been out of commission since the conflict began.

Inevitable collapse of Libyan regime

Western governments say their bombardment of Libyan military targets is beginning to tip the balance in favor of the rebels in the conflict.

“We have significantly degraded Gadhafi’s war machine. And now we see results, the opposition has gained ground,” NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen told a news conference in Bratislava on Thursday.

“I am confident that a combination of strong military pressure and increased political pressure and support for the opposition will eventually lead to the collapse of the regime.”

Meanwhile, speaking in a major address about the Middle East on Thursday, US President Barack Obama said it was inevitable that Gadhafi would be forced from power.

“Time is working against Gadhafi. He does not have control over his country. The opposition has organized a legitimate and credible Interim Council,” Obama said in Washington.

“When Gadhafi inevitably leaves or is forced from power, decades of provocation will come to an end and the transition to a democratic Libya can proceed,” he added.

But Libyan government spokesman Ibrahim refuted Obama’s claims. “He believes the lies that his own government and media spread around the world,” he said.

“It’s not Obama who decides whether Moammar Gadhafi leaves Libya or not. It’s the Libyan people.”

Tags: LibyaLibyan NavyNATOrebelswarships
Previous Post

Is It Time to Consider Alternatives to the Joint Strike Fighter?

Next Post

Iran arms elite Guards with ballistic missile: report

Related Posts

Australia to get nuclear submarines in new US, British partnership

Australia to buy US nuclear subs in ambitious new pact

March 14, 2023

Australia has unveiled plans to buy up to five US nuclear-powered submarines, then build a new model with US and...

US Navy Installs Next-Gen Network on USS Ronald Reagan

Quad powers concerned over militarisation in Asian seas

March 3, 2023

The United States, Japan, India and Australia expressed concern Friday over the militarization of Asia's waters, in a veiled reference...

Next Post
Iran test fires surface-to-surface missile

Iran arms elite Guards with ballistic missile: report

Latest Defense News

Russian navy in show of strength with 26 new ships this year

Russian navy ‘repelled’ drone attack on Crimea port

March 23, 2023
Officials provide details on building the Space Force, its structure, and operating imperatives

Reagan’s ‘Star Wars’ at 40: Battle of the satellites

March 23, 2023
China will ‘never commit to abandoning the use of force’ on Taiwan: Xi

China diplomatic offensive lays down new challenge for US

March 22, 2023
Hwasong-17 ICBM

North Korea fires ‘long-range’ missile as S. Korea president heads to Japan

March 16, 2023
North Korea fires multiple suspected cruise missiles

North Korea fires two ballistic missiles, Seoul says

March 14, 2023
Australia to get nuclear submarines in new US, British partnership

Australia to buy US nuclear subs in ambitious new pact

March 14, 2023

Defense Forum Discussions

  • NZDF General discussion thread
  • Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates
  • (4K) 2 Eurofighter Typhoon German Air Force Luftwaffe departure at Neuburg Donau Airbase ETSN
  • The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread
  • Italian Air Force Update and Topic
  • Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
  • Indian Navy Discussions and Updates
  • Russia and the West
  • Warbirds (Historical, Veteran & Vintage Military Aircraft)
  • Australian Army Discussions and Updates
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com