Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates

MickB

Well-Known Member
There are no likely S E Asian countries that are looking at the Skyceptor (S Korea and Japan have their own system).

Does that mean we would need to establish our own production line if we wanted Skyceptor?

I can't see that being easy, but it might be an option if Raytheon set up a joint missile factory for multiple missile types, such as perhaps AMRAAM, ESSM and Skyceptor.

Last point is that the final integrated system has to have some form of short range utra cheap mass interception capability (drones, lasers and/or guns). It can't be an all multi million dollar missile system. Even the Skyceptor is supposedly in the million dollar range.
Avoid long ques, go with the S K products and establish a joint production line here in Australia.

Both L SAM and M SAM look to be a good fit.
M SAM is now combat proven by UAE.
 
Last edited:

Tbone

Active Member
Do we have any new information on how the BAE STRIX drone is developing? I was excited to see this sovereign drone tested but all is silent on where it is at. With potential use with Apache, long range ISR and potential maritime variants lifting off vessels like the Arafura and LHD’s I thought this would be fast tracked considering it has strike options when it comes to payloads but it seems to have come to nothing.. anyone here maybe to able to shed some light ?
 

SamB

Member
Do we have any new information on how the BAE STRIX drone is developing? I was excited to see this sovereign drone tested but all is silent on where it is at. With potential use with Apache, long range ISR and potential maritime variants lifting off vessels like the Arafura and LHD’s I thought this would be fast tracked considering it has strike options when it comes to payloads but it seems to have come to nothing.. anyone here maybe to able to shed some light ?
INNOVAERO is an Australian owned and operated autonomous arial systems manufacturer of systems such as STRIX. BAE opens the door to global marketing and military sales. In January of this year INNOVAERO increased its workforce to meet demand.

Looks like they're having a good time of it.
 

Tbone

Active Member
Seems like the focus is all on the OWL loitering drone not the Strix drone which is a lot larger platform. Is it still moving ahead as it seemed it was really gaining speed and promising capability!
 

ADMk2

Just a bloke
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
Do we have any new information on how the BAE STRIX drone is developing? I was excited to see this sovereign drone tested but all is silent on where it is at. With potential use with Apache, long range ISR and potential maritime variants lifting off vessels like the Arafura and LHD’s I thought this would be fast tracked considering it has strike options when it comes to payloads but it seems to have come to nothing.. anyone here maybe to able to shed some light ?
Hasn’t yet been picked up by ADF even in a trials basis, from recollection.

OWL-B however is being pursued enthusiastically,
 

Tbone

Active Member
With the withdrawal of the spartan from service in the coming years and with the replacement a commercial aircraft is a military version of the skycourier from Cessna the likely low cost option the governance is looking for?? It ticks a lot of boxes!
 

StevoJH

The Bunker Group
With the withdrawal of the spartan from service in the coming years and with the replacement a commercial aircraft is a military version of the skycourier from Cessna the likely low cost option the governance is looking for?? It ticks a lot of boxes!
It could be anything.

They could also purchase/charter 737 Freighters and use ADF or chartered helicopters/light aircraft to distribute from a hub.
 

FormerDirtDart

Well-Known Member
With the withdrawal of the spartan from service in the coming years and with the replacement a commercial aircraft is a military version of the skycourier from Cessna the likely low cost option the governance is looking for?? It ticks a lot of boxes!
Don't get me wrong, the SkyCouirer is a sweet little mail truck. But I would think the CASA/PTDI NC212 would be a better option for military/humanitarian support operations. Updated modern version still being built and supported practically locally in Indonesia. As you say, it ticks a lot of boxes.
 

SamB

Member
Don't get me wrong, the SkyCouirer is a sweet little mail truck. But I would think the CASA/PTDI NC212 would be a better option for military/humanitarian support operations. Updated modern version still being built and supported practically locally in Indonesia. As you say, it ticks a lot of boxes.
What about the Pilatus PC-24 in use with the Flying Doctors?
 

Wombat000

Well-Known Member
With regard to the discussion of alternate Spartan ‘lite’ tactical transport solutions,
are we talking about something akin to the old Nomads, Porters etc operated by Army, or are we more aligned with a solution that can fwd deploy ammunition loads (including such things as GLMRS) and heavier weighted tactical (STOL) resupply?
 

old faithful

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
As far as the spartian goes....Personally I would prefer the funds be allocated to SF air ops. A dedicated rotary wing of a mix of little birds and Blackhawks to directly support SF. Of course the blackhawks could be used elsewhere in a pich if needed. Perhaps 2 more chinooks to take the total to 16.
 

SamB

Member
With regard to the discussion of alternate Spartan ‘lite’ tactical transport solutions,
are we talking about something akin to the old Nomads, Porters etc operated by Army, or are we more aligned with a solution that can fwd deploy ammunition loads (including such things as GLMRS) and heavier weighted tactical (STOL) resupply?
There are no like for like or cutting edged replacement for Spartan that I could find. It's a niche lite role CAS Evac over water, light team transport and priority delivery for critical repairs and same day delivery. RAAF probably only needs I don't know how many airframes RAAF might want. Basically the same concept as the flying doctors.
 

Wombat000

Well-Known Member
There are no like for like or cutting edged replacement for Spartan that I could find. It's a niche lite role CAS Evac over water, light team transport and priority delivery for critical repairs and same day delivery. RAAF probably only needs I don't know how many airframes RAAF might want. Basically the same concept as the flying doctors.
In that case, RAAF already operate King Airs, perhaps they can/are catering to that requirement.
Such small peri-theatre direct Army support role probably adds weight to an argument for reinstating an Army fixed wing component after all, a Nomad 2.0 type?
 

SamB

Member
In that case, RAAF already operate King Airs, perhaps they can/are catering to that requirement.
Such small peri-theatre direct Army support role probably adds weight to an argument for reinstating an Army fixed wing component after all, a Nomad 2.0 type?
One of the staff members, MrConservitve prefered the PC-24 rough field landings over the KingAir. Would open up a number of previously inaccessible airstrips, privately owned ones. Would be essential for same day deliveries/uber in support of Army.

Pilatus PC24

Payload: Max payload: 1,406 kg

Cruise speed: 810 km/h (510 mph, 440 kn)

Range: 3,700 km (2,300 mi, 2,000 nmi) , 6 passengers (1,200 lb payload)

Spartan

Payload: source says 5000 kgs but I've seen higher.

Speed: 670km

Range: 1700km at maximum take off weight

I have it under good authority that RAAF strategic airlift is satisfied with a mix of whitetail, C-130J and CH-47.

Not sure if ARMY will be into HADR air missions or tactical lift. Arguably they'd drive there or hop on a ferry.

Pilatus PC24 as medical evacuation and pre positioning drone teams for example, surveillance or drone repairs domestically and across water.

But yeah. Different reasons.
 

hauritz

Well-Known Member
I would throw cargo drones into the mix as well. There are more options these days than like for like replacement of airlift capability. The modern battlefield might be getting too dangerous for conventional manned aircraft. Many nations, including Australia, are looking at unmanned options to compliment and in some cases replace manned aircraft.
 

Stampede

Well-Known Member
I don’t know what a tactical air lifter is nowadays as I don’t know what the “ front line “looks like in this day and age.
I think slow moving anything is becoming problematic.
Given the decision to retire the Spartan is a done deal, I don’t realistically see a replacement for it.
Rather the 20 proposed C130 will replace the current 12 130j and 10 Spartans.
The Spartan replacement will quietly disappear.
Maybe an unmanned logistic thing way down the track.

Cheers S
 

Takao

The Bunker Group
I don’t know what a tactical air lifter is nowadays as I don’t know what the “ front line “looks like in this day and age.
I think slow moving anything is becoming problematic.
Given the decision to retire the Spartan is a done deal, I don’t realistically see a replacement for it.
Rather the 20 proposed C130 will replace the current 12 130j and 10 Spartans.
The Spartan replacement will quietly disappear.
Maybe an unmanned logistic thing way down the track.

Cheers S
100% correct

The optimal mix is C-17 / C-130 / CH-47. That's been the findings of at least three in-depth studies I've seen since 2017. The KC-30 gives a nice little bump.

Without a clear need, and with all the other demands on the budget and workforce, the C-27 should be retired with no replacement.
 

Lolcake

Active Member
The
As far as the spartian goes....Personally I would prefer the funds be allocated to SF air ops. A dedicated rotary wing of a mix of little birds and Blackhawks to directly support SF. Of course the blackhawks could be used elsewhere in a pich if needed. Perhaps 2 more chinooks to take the total to 16.
The one thing that disappointed me.most was the lack of funding for dedicated SF air assets.
 

spoz

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
A question which probably shows both age and inability to keep up - how is support for PTS provided these days? In my day it was Porters and Caribous, with the occasional C130. Well, I did say it was age related!
 
Top