Sunday, March 15, 2026
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result
Home Defence & Military News Defense Geopolitics News

Long-term US Iraq bill to be 25 billion dollars: Congress

by Editor
September 21, 2007
in Defense Geopolitics News
2 min read
0
14
VIEWS

Agence France-Presse,

WASHINGTON (AFP): A decades-long US presence in Iraq would cost around 25 billion dollars a year in combat conditions, and up to 10 billion even in more peaceful times, a new congressional report said.
 
 The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) tallied up the price-tag for a long stay in Iraq after the White House said in May the half-century US military presence in South Korea could be a model for future Iraq deployments.

Upfront costs for a combat force of 55,000 US troops, modelled on the current US mission in Iraq, would mean a one-time payment of “four to eight billion dollars and annual costs of approximately 25 billion dollars.”

Even a US force of the same size in a less exposed non-combat role, would entail up-front costs of eight billion dollars and an annual outlay of up to 10 billion dollars, the report said.

The report by the CBO, which provides non-partisan budget and economic costings for Congress, was commissioned by Democratic Senator Kent Conrad.

“The American people deserve to know that they are going to be handed a multi-trillion dollar bill from this president to cover the cost of his misguided policy in Iraq,” Conrad said in a statement.

“The Bush administration has been trying to hide the cost of this war every step of the way.”

Bush said in a live televised address to Americans last week after testimony to Congress by war commander General David Petraeus, that Iraq required US political, economic, and security engagement “beyond my presidency.”

US troop levels in Iraq currently number around 168,000, though Bush said last week a gradual drawdown will start within weeks, which will take levels down to around 130,000 by the middle of next year.

According to a report by the non-partisan Congressional Research Service in July, the United States has already shelled out well over half a trillion dollars on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and running costs have hit 12 billion dollars a month.

The United States has stationed tens of thousands of soldiers in South Korea since the 1950-53 Korean War, and currently has 29,500 troops helping the 680,000-strong South Korean military face down North Korea's 1.1-million-strong forces.

Previous Post

US, Iraq, Set Up Panel to Examine Role of Security Contractors

Next Post

Agencies say UK Reclassifying Cluster Bomb to Beat the Ban

Related Posts

Israel cancels leave for combat units after Iran consulate strike

US says Iran campaign cost $11 billion in six days

March 12, 2026

The opening week of the war against Iran cost the United States more than $11.3 billion, lawmakers were told in...

Lebanon says Israeli strike kills 3 journalists

Israel strikes central Beirut as Lebanon death toll tops 630

March 11, 2026

Israel carried out a strike in the heart of Beirut on Wednesday for a second time since Lebanon was dragged...

Next Post

Agencies say UK Reclassifying Cluster Bomb to Beat the Ban

Latest Defense News

US needs top cyber coordinator, better hacker ‘deterrence’

‘Digital fog of war’ around Iranian cyberattacks

March 13, 2026
US military says aircraft crash in Iraq killed 4 crew members

US military says aircraft crash in Iraq killed 4 crew members

March 13, 2026
Northrop Grumman moves to boost B-21 Raider output

Northrop Grumman moves to boost B-21 Raider output

March 13, 2026
US Navy evacuates virus-struck aircraft carrier Roosevelt

US military ‘not ready’ to escort tankers through Hormuz Strait

March 12, 2026
Israel cancels leave for combat units after Iran consulate strike

US says Iran campaign cost $11 billion in six days

March 12, 2026
US moves closer to retaliation over hacking as cyber woes grow

Cyberattack Disrupts Operations at MedTech Giant Stryker

March 11, 2026

Defense Forum Discussions

  • Indian Air Force Development discussion
  • Middle East Defence & Security
  • Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates
  • Turkey's future weapons
  • Australian Army Discussions and Updates
  • The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread
  • Indonesia: 'green water navy'
  • Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force Thread
  • RSN capabilities
  • Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com