Thursday, March 12, 2026
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result
Home Defence & Military News Missile News

Anti-missile protection: Who will pay?

by Editor
December 13, 2005
in Missile News
2 min read
0
14
VIEWS

United Press International,

WASHINGTON: As defense contractors move ahead with prototype systems to protect civilian airliners from shoulder-fired missiles, urgent questions linger unanswered: How much will it cost? Who should pay? And — most urgent of all — is it worth the money?

“On a coast-to-coast flight from New York to San Francisco, every customer would have to pay one dollar more” to be protected by a plane-based missile protection system, said Jack Pledger of Northrop Grumman, who joined a panel last week at the Heritage Foundation. The financially troubled airlines, though, doubt that number, fearing that the already hesitating customers wouldn't accept higher costs.

Shoulder-fired anti-aircraft missiles, also known as MAN-Portable Air Defense Systems or MANPADS, thousands of which are believed to be in the hands of insurgents or terrorists worldwide, are seen by the U.S. government as a major threat to passenger air travel and the commercial aviation industry.

John M. Meenan, senior vice president of the Air Transport Association of America, which represents the major airlines, says there is too much focus on these missiles, which “are only one piece of a much larger mosaic of concern.” He told the Heritage panel he recommended a risk management analysis that considers anti-missile measures as a part of a larger security strategy.

The State Department says that shoulder-launched anti-aircraft missiles have shot down 25 civilian aircraft since the 1970s, killing 600 people.

“Most of the aircraft that were brought down by MANPADS were small and operated in a war-time environment,” Meenan told United Press International in a telephone interview. “They got shot in countries like Angola, Sudan or Afghanistan. There's never been an attack in the United States and the ATA does not operate in any of these countries.

“We are not saying that it couldn't happen,” Meenan cautioned.

Several large defense contractors are developing anti-MANPADS systems for civilian airliners.

California-based Northrop Grumman offers a system installed under the plane. Military constructor Raytheon, based in Massachusetts, is developing a system to be installed in airports. Both systems detects the missiles and then inteferes with their guidance systems so they miss their target.

To Read Full Article Click Here

Previous Post

Airborne Laser Completes Laser Ground Tests

Next Post

US Air Force Releases New Mission Statement

Related Posts

Patriot missile defense system deployed in central Turkey

March 10, 2026

Turkey said Tuesday a Patriot missile defence system was being deployed in the centre of the country, a day after...

Japan to deploy counter-strike missiles closer to China

Japan to deploy counter-strike missiles closer to China

March 9, 2026

Japan will deploy a batch of long-range, counter-strike missiles in a southwest region near China by the end of March,...

Next Post

US Air Force Releases New Mission Statement

Latest Defense News

US Navy evacuates virus-struck aircraft carrier Roosevelt

US military ‘not ready’ to escort tankers through Hormuz Strait

March 12, 2026
Israel cancels leave for combat units after Iran consulate strike

US says Iran campaign cost $11 billion in six days

March 12, 2026
US moves closer to retaliation over hacking as cyber woes grow

Cyberattack Disrupts Operations at MedTech Giant Stryker

March 11, 2026
Lebanon says Israeli strike kills 3 journalists

Israel strikes central Beirut as Lebanon death toll tops 630

March 11, 2026

Patriot missile defense system deployed in central Turkey

March 10, 2026
Iran unveils ballistic missile, ‘new generation’ engines

Iran says missile attacks to continue, US talks ‘not on agenda’

March 10, 2026

Defense Forum Discussions

  • Indonesia: 'green water navy'
  • Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
  • Australian Army Discussions and Updates
  • German Bundeswehr
  • Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) News and Discussions
  • NATO Airbus A330 Taker KC-30A MRTT Multinational MRTT Fleet T-057 takeoff at RAF Fairford
  • Middle East Defence & Security
  • ADF General discussion thread
  • Military Aviation News and Discussion
  • The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com