Thursday, April 2, 2026
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result
Home Defence & Military News Defense Geopolitics News

Afghanistan’s private security firms given more time

by Agence France-Presse
March 20, 2012
in Defense Geopolitics News
2 min read
0
DOD begins prorating imminent danger pay
14
VIEWS

Private security firms in Afghanistan have been given more time before having to suspend operations, the Afghan interior ministry said Monday.

Most of the companies will now be dissolved in the coming weeks, ministry spokesman Sediq Sediqqi told AFP. The majority had been due to close by Tuesday.

There are about 50 security companies operating in Afghanistan, down from more than a hundred in 2007, providing services for foreign troops, diplomatic missions and aid organisations.

But relations with the authorities have deteriorated and Karzai has accused the firms of breaking the law and taking business away from Afghans.

According to the manager of one medium-sized firm — employing 1,200 people — companies providing security to military and diplomatic institutions will escape the ban.

Customers of other companies who want to continue using armed guards will have to turn to the APPF (Afghan Public Protect Force), a for-profit force created by Kabul to take the place of private firms.

“Most of our clients simply do not want to go to APPF because of the trust. They don’t trust its reliability, its management,” said the security firm manager, who did not want to be named.

One of the concerns is that without sufficient vetting of personnel, insurgents or criminals may enter the APPF’s ranks.

“We are not concerned about the quality of our guards but of our quality in general, so that we can satisfy our clients,” Sediqqi said, adding that just under 2,000 men had been recruited.

After announcing the closure of private security firms, the Afghan government has repeatedly rolled back on its plans and extended the deadline.

Following the collapse of the Taliban regime in a US-led invasion in 2001 private security firms rushed in to fill a vacuum created by a lack of adequately trained police and army forces.

But perceptions that personnel were little more than gun-toting mercenaries, roaming the countryside with impunity, made them deeply unpopular among Afghans.

There are about 130,000 US-led NATO forces fighting a Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan in defence of the Afghan government, and all combat troops are due to leave by the end of 2014.

Tags: afghanistanPrivate Securitysecurity
Previous Post

North Korea invites IAEA, says US deal still in force

Next Post

Air Force changes name of MC-130J

Related Posts

Israel cancels leave for combat units after Iran consulate strike

US says Iran campaign cost $11 billion in six days

March 12, 2026

The opening week of the war against Iran cost the United States more than $11.3 billion, lawmakers were told in...

Lebanon says Israeli strike kills 3 journalists

Israel strikes central Beirut as Lebanon death toll tops 630

March 11, 2026

Israel carried out a strike in the heart of Beirut on Wednesday for a second time since Lebanon was dragged...

Next Post
Air Force changes name of MC-130J

Air Force changes name of MC-130J

Latest Defense News

US needs top cyber coordinator, better hacker ‘deterrence’

‘Digital fog of war’ around Iranian cyberattacks

March 13, 2026
US military says aircraft crash in Iraq killed 4 crew members

US military says aircraft crash in Iraq killed 4 crew members

March 13, 2026
Northrop Grumman moves to boost B-21 Raider output

Northrop Grumman moves to boost B-21 Raider output

March 13, 2026
US Navy evacuates virus-struck aircraft carrier Roosevelt

US military ‘not ready’ to escort tankers through Hormuz Strait

March 12, 2026
Israel cancels leave for combat units after Iran consulate strike

US says Iran campaign cost $11 billion in six days

March 12, 2026
US moves closer to retaliation over hacking as cyber woes grow

Cyberattack Disrupts Operations at MedTech Giant Stryker

March 11, 2026

Defense Forum Discussions

  • Indonesian Aero News
  • Australian Army Discussions and Updates
  • Middle East Defence & Security
  • ADF General discussion thread
  • General Naval News
  • Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
  • General Information on missile/artillery developments
  • Indonesia: 'green water navy'
  • Future Energy Pathways
  • Luftwaffe/German Air Force News, Discussions & Updates
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com