Sunday, March 15, 2026
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result
Home Defence & Military News Nuclear Weapons News

Pentagon studying Putin nuclear order

by Agence France-Presse
February 28, 2022
in Nuclear Weapons News
2 min read
0
Afghan security worse in second part of 2015: Pentagon
14
VIEWS

US officials on Monday called Russian President Vladimir Putin’s order to mobilize his nuclear forces “dangerous” but said they had not seen any indication of any change in the country’s strategic threat.

Officials also said that Russian troops in Ukraine continue to move ahead slowly, hampered by fuel supply issues, and downplayed reports that the Belarus army intended to enter Ukraine as reinforcements for Moscow’s invasion force.

On Sunday, four days after Moscow launched the invasion, Putin announced that he had ordered his military chiefs “to put the deterrence forces of the Russian army into a special mode of combat service.”

Officials at the US State and Defense Departments said they were still trying to determine just what action was being taken in response to the order.

“We think provocative rhetoric regarding nuclear weapons is dangerous, adds to the risk of miscalculation, should be avoided, and we will not indulge in it,” a State Department spokesperson said.

“Russia and the United States have long agreed that nuclear use would have devastating consequences, and have stated many times, including earlier this year, that a nuclear war cannot be won, and must never be fought,” the spokesperson said.

A senior Pentagon official said there had been no palpable change in the stance of Russia’s powerful nuclear arsenal, but called Putin’s order “unnecessary and very escalatory.”

“I don’t believe we’ve seen anything specific as a result of the direction that he gave,” the official told reporters.

The US officials said Russia was facing no military threat from the West, even as the United States and NATO allies were supplying arms to Ukraine to counter the Russian invasion.

The Pentagon official said the language Putin used in his order was not consistent with what would be expected in mobilizing nuclear forces.

“It’s not a doctrinal term, and the way he characterized it, a ‘special combat duty alert’ … it’s not a term of art in what we understand to be Russian doctrine,” the official said.

Resistance ‘pretty effective’
The Pentagon official said that the Russian invasion force continued to wrestle with logistical problems that had left them short of their apparent goals Monday.

The main Russian targets remain to capture Kharkiv, the site of the heaviest fighting, and Kyiv, the capital.

And while satellite photos from Maxar show a massive Russian military column north of Kyiv, they remain 25 kilometers away, advancing just five kilometers in the past day, according to the official.

“They’re running out of gas, and they’re having logistics problems,” the official said.

“The Ukrainians have proved pretty effective” in their resistance, the official added.

Meanwhile the official said the Pentagon had not seen Belarus troops take part in Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, despite concerns that they will.

Belarus, which borders Ukraine and is a close ally of Russia, did allow its territory to be used as a staging ground for the invasion.

“We have seen no indications that Belarusian troops are being readied to move into Ukraine, and certainly no indications that they are in fact, moving or are in Ukraine,” the official said.

The official also said there was no evidence Russia would place nuclear weapons in Belarus, as a way of challenging NATO’s support for Ukraine.

Tags: nuclear weaponspentagonPutinrussia
Previous Post

Anonymous hacker group targets Russian state media

Next Post

Vast Russian army convoy spotted north of Kyiv

Related Posts

Finland gears up for historic NATO decision

Kremlin says nuclear weapons in Finland would threaten Russia

March 9, 2026

Russia said on Friday it saw Finland's move to lift restrictions on hosting nuclear weapons as a potential threat and...

Turkey says NATO summit ‘not the deadline’ for Finland, Sweden talks

Finland to allow nuclear weapons on its soil: government

March 6, 2026

Finland said Thursday it planned to lift restrictions prohibiting nuclear weapons on its soil, in order to bring the country...

Next Post
Vast Russian army convoy spotted north of Kyiv

Vast Russian army convoy spotted north of Kyiv

Latest Defense News

US needs top cyber coordinator, better hacker ‘deterrence’

‘Digital fog of war’ around Iranian cyberattacks

March 13, 2026
US military says aircraft crash in Iraq killed 4 crew members

US military says aircraft crash in Iraq killed 4 crew members

March 13, 2026
Northrop Grumman moves to boost B-21 Raider output

Northrop Grumman moves to boost B-21 Raider output

March 13, 2026
US Navy evacuates virus-struck aircraft carrier Roosevelt

US military ‘not ready’ to escort tankers through Hormuz Strait

March 12, 2026
Israel cancels leave for combat units after Iran consulate strike

US says Iran campaign cost $11 billion in six days

March 12, 2026
US moves closer to retaliation over hacking as cyber woes grow

Cyberattack Disrupts Operations at MedTech Giant Stryker

March 11, 2026

Defense Forum Discussions

  • Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates
  • The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread
  • Turkey's future weapons
  • General Information on missile/artillery developments
  • Australian Army Discussions and Updates
  • Middle East Defence & Security
  • Indian Air Force Development discussion
  • Indonesia: 'green water navy'
  • Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force Thread
  • RSN capabilities
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com