Sunday, March 22, 2026
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result
Home Defence & Military News Defense Geopolitics News

New Rules of Engagement for German Troops in Afghanistan

by German Radio
July 7, 2009
in Defense Geopolitics News
2 min read
0
14
VIEWS

According to media reports, the German government has dropped some of the conditions of engagement under which its soldiers in Afghanistan had been bound. Bundeswehr troops will in future be able to engage in combat much earlier than has been the case.German News Magazine, Der Spiegel, reported the change in its online edition on Saturday.

The key to the new terms of engagement, Der Spiegel said, is the deletion of one sentence, which said that “the use of deadly force is forbidden as long as an attack has not taken place, or is not immediately imminent.”

Now the wording has been changed from “immediately imminent” to “recognizable”.

A further phrase, referring to appropriate use of force, was also removed from the Bundeswehr’s duty statement, opening the doors for German troops to take a more offensive stance in Afghanistan.

Defense Minister Franz Josef Jung said the new wording would give soldiers the necessary legal rights to deal with combat situations.

There had been recent allegations that soldiers did not have the legal authority to bring adequate firepower to their defense when under attack.

A speaker for the German Defense Ministry responded to the report in the magazine by saying that the rules of engagement are continually under review.

The security situation in the north of the country has been deteriorating, with Taliban attacks on Bundeswehr soldiers on the rise.

In Germany, the coalition government is arguing over whether the mission, which is widely unpopular with the German public, actually means that German troops are fighting a war in the Hindu Kush.

Although Social Democrat Party chief Peter Struck, and much of the German public see it as such, the Defense Minister Franz Josef Jung seems to have a different opinion.

Meanwhile, the Christian Social Union Bavarian parliamentary group head, Peter Ramsauer, has reinforced demands for an exit-strategy for the Afghanistan deployment.

Last Thursday, the German mission to Afghanistan was expanded to include an extra 300 AWACS surveillance aircraft personnel. The German parliament voted on the deployment, with more than 80 percent in favor.

That still does not bring German troop numbers up to the maximum 4,500 permitted under the government mandate.

In total, 35 German soldiers have died in Afghanistan as part of the NATO-led ISAF mission since 2002.

Tags: afghanistangermanypakistanRoEruleswar
Previous Post

Taliban launch ‘operation’ against Marines

Next Post

Russia Allows Transit for Afghanistan-bound US Troops

Related Posts

Israel cancels leave for combat units after Iran consulate strike

US says Iran campaign cost $11 billion in six days

March 12, 2026

The opening week of the war against Iran cost the United States more than $11.3 billion, lawmakers were told in...

Lebanon says Israeli strike kills 3 journalists

Israel strikes central Beirut as Lebanon death toll tops 630

March 11, 2026

Israel carried out a strike in the heart of Beirut on Wednesday for a second time since Lebanon was dragged...

Next Post

Russia Allows Transit for Afghanistan-bound US Troops

Latest Defense News

US needs top cyber coordinator, better hacker ‘deterrence’

‘Digital fog of war’ around Iranian cyberattacks

March 13, 2026
US military says aircraft crash in Iraq killed 4 crew members

US military says aircraft crash in Iraq killed 4 crew members

March 13, 2026
Northrop Grumman moves to boost B-21 Raider output

Northrop Grumman moves to boost B-21 Raider output

March 13, 2026
US Navy evacuates virus-struck aircraft carrier Roosevelt

US military ‘not ready’ to escort tankers through Hormuz Strait

March 12, 2026
Israel cancels leave for combat units after Iran consulate strike

US says Iran campaign cost $11 billion in six days

March 12, 2026
US moves closer to retaliation over hacking as cyber woes grow

Cyberattack Disrupts Operations at MedTech Giant Stryker

March 11, 2026

Defense Forum Discussions

  • British Army News and Discussion
  • Middle East Defence & Security
  • Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates
  • Marine Nationale (French Navy)
  • Indonesian Aero News
  • Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
  • The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread
  • F-35 Program - General Discussion
  • Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates
  • German Navy
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com