The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread

KipPotapych

Well-Known Member
First of all, it is not up to me or you to decide who deserves what and decisions of any sovereign state. You answered your own statement. It is not up to you what Ukraine determines it needs to do to defend it's national sovereignty. If Ukraine feels that allowing Russia to profit in any way that allows it to prolong it's imperalist ambitions to the detriment of Ukraines very survival then they are absolutley in their right to hold an intervention.
Like I said, amazing stuff. We basically let Ukraine decide how Germany, France, Italy, Canada, -insert name-, and, furthermore, NATO conduct their own business and we have no problems with Ukraine a foreign state attacking and destroying anyone’s infrastructure as they see fit. Makes a lot of sense, of course. And par for the course.

Imagine, a country attacking multiple NATO members with no repercussions whatsoever because they are defending their sovereignty, while having a complete disregard for the sovereignty of the said members of the Alliance. And the latter is completely irrelevant too.
 
Last edited:

rsemmes

Active Member
Germany and Japan were broke in 1945 , but managed to continue war production.
So...
How long before Russia goes actually broke?
How long after that can Russia manage to continue war production and keep fighting in Ukraine?
If after all that China decides to finance Russia, how long can Russia "keep in the fight"?

In short, how many years does NATO (Ukraine) has to "hold"?
 

rsemmes

Active Member
It is not up to you what Ukraine determines it needs to do to defend it's national sovereignty.
So, it is not up to you what Russia determines it needs to do to defend it's national sovereignty or whatever high horse statement Russia decides to sell.
Correct?
 
Top