United Nations: The need has “doubled” to create a nuclear weapons-free zone in the Middle East as Britain, Russia and the United States have done nothing to carry out a 1995 pledge to set it up, Egypt told a UN conference here Wednesday.
In a speech read in his absence to a conference reviewing the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Abul-Gheit said: “the need is doubled today for the effective and comprehensive implementation of the 1995 (NPT) resolution on the Middle East.”
He noted that the three states, Britain, Russia and the United States, which sponsored this resolution have, in fact, exerted “no effort… to assure its implementation.”
His remarks were read out by Egypt’s UN Ambassador Maged Abdel Aziz.
Egypt is leading non-aligned nations in a push to convene next year a conference to discuss turning the Middle East into a zone free of nuclear weapons.
The non-aligned states also want Israel
, which is believed to have some 200 atomic bombs, officially to declare its arsenal and then join the NPT in order to disarm.
Israel says it will only do this after there is a peace agreement in the Middle East. This position is supported by the United States.
Arab diplomats object, saying that the creation of a weapons-free zone would actually be a catalyst towards reaching peace.
Egypt and the United States are trying to work out a compromise to start talks on a Middle East nuclear weapons-free zone, diplomats said.
Deadlock over this issue threatens to block progress at the NPT meeting, which focuses on disarmament, non-proliferation and the peaceful use of nuclear energy.
Arab diplomats insist that creating such a zone should not be held hostage to the lack of peace in the Middle East.
“A conference should look at whatever steps are necessary to move forward,” said one diplomat.
“But we expect it would be one which would launch negotiations on a zone and not just be a talk shop,” he said.
NPT review conferences have been held every five years since the treaty was signed in 1970.
The 1995 review conference called for a Middle East free of nuclear weapons and extended the NPT indefinitely.
The 2000 conference outlined steps toward disarmament by nuclear-weapons states.
But the NPT process stalled in 2005, when bickering over a Middle East weapons-free zone and over the Iranian nuclear crisis destroyed any chance of new agreements or fixes to the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov told the NPT conference Tuesday his nation shares “the concerns of many states related to the implementation” of the 1995 resolution on setting up a zone free of weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East.
Abul-Gheit also spoke out against using concerns about proliferation of nuclear weapons to limit the rights of developing states to peaceful atomic energy or to amend the treaty to punish states that withdraw.
South African delegate Abdul Minty told the conference that the meeting is “a litmus test” for the NPT, both for nuclear states to disarm and for peaceful nuclear energy to be guaranteed for all.
The conference must not allow any decisions “which may infringe on the inalienable rights of all states parties to the verifiable peaceful application of nuclear energy, as provided for under the treaty.”
And Algerian Foreign Minister Mourad Medelci urged nuclear weapon states “to commit themselves not to grant their cooperation in the civilian nuclear field to states not parties to the NPT.”
“Restrictive measures, in the field of nuclear cooperation, will help to discourage those states from remaining outside the NPT,” he told the conference.
Medelci said progress on this path would help achieve progress on the issue of setting up a nuclear weapon free zone in the Middle East, “which remains hostage to the refusal of Israel to accede to the NPT and to put its nuclear installations under IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) inspections.”
The 1995 NPT resolution calls on “states in the Middle East to take practical steps… towards… the establishment of an effectively verifiable Middle East zone free of weapons of mass destruction, nuclear, chemical and biological, their delivery systems, and to refrain from taking any measures that preclude the achievement of this objective.”
