Tuesday, June 28, 2022
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result

Does Anyone Care About the Fate of the US Military?

by Lexington institute
September 23, 2013
in Defense Geopolitics News
2 min read
0
USS Ronald Reagan Aircraft Carrier Deploys
14
VIEWS

It’s official. The leadership of this country including the major media outlets have lost their collective minds. Yesterday, the Joint Chiefs of Staff testified before the House Armed Services Committee that if sequestration continues, they could not say with confidence that the U.S. military could successfully handle even one serious conflict!

Not a war on the Korean Peninsula, a conflict over the Strait of Hormuz, the defense of Japan or Taiwan from attack or even meet our obligations under the NATO Treaty to defend Europe.

According to BreakingDefense, “each of the Joint Chiefs was asked by Rep. Randy Forbes, chairman of the HASC seapower and power projection forces subcommittee, if they could execute the military’s basic Strategic Planning Guidance, which requires that U.S. forces be able to handle one enemy and to deter another. Down the line he went. Odierno: no; Greenert: no; Welsh: no. Amos, yes, but.”

So the Army, Navy and Air Force leaders all said they will not be able to meet the basic requirement for the U.S. military. The Marine Corps Commandant, General Amos said “yes, but”; however his service’s mission is so different from the rest. Moreover, without adequate support from his brothers in arms, the yes is irrelevant.

Was this story on the front page of the nation’s major newspapers? No.

Was it a lead story by the morning television news programs? It was not.

Did talk radio bring it up? Not as far as I could tell, channel surfing today.

America is disarming and no one, including the Commander in Chief, seems to care. Remember, sequestration was a White House idea. When his military commanders tell Congress they will not be able to defend this country if sequestration continues, you would think it would be worth at least a mention by President Obama. Nope.

Actually, this is not quite true. Our current and future enemies care. They are waiting for us to sink into the depths of budget insanity. Then they will have clear paths to achieving their goals, be it reunification of the Korean Peninsula on Pyongyang’s terms, dominance by Beijing of Asia, control of the strategic Persian Gulf by Iran or the recreation of the Russian empire.

Our current allies care. Don’t think for minute that Japan, Korea, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Egypt, Taiwan and half a dozen other countries won’t see the collapse of the U.S. military and the de facto termination of U.S. security guarantees as reason enough to acquire nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles. Northeast Asia alone could have five or six nuclear powers before the decade is over. That should give everyone in Washington a warm feeling, right?

By the way, if the U.S. military cannot say with confidence that they could win even one major conventional conflict that would leave this country with only two options: surrender or nuclear deterrence. We would have to go back to the bad old days of Massive Retaliation. It means modernizing aging and obsolescing strategic and theater nuclear forces, abandoning current arms control agreements in order to increase both the size and sophistication of our new nuclear force structure and living again under the sword of Damocles.

Anyone want to talk about what the Joint Chiefs just said? Anyone care about the impending implosion of the U.S. Military? Anyone want to end the madness and find a solution to sequestration? Apparently not.

Tags: budgetSequestrationUSWorld Military
Previous Post

Saab Self-Protection System for the Indian Advanced Light Helicopter

Next Post

Northrop Grumman Maturing Key Triton Unmanned Aircraft Sensor

Related Posts

Former NATO chief Javier Solana has coronavirus

Finland, Sweden leaders to discuss NATO bid with Erdogan

June 27, 2022

Finnish and Swedish leaders will discuss their stalled NATO bids with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Tuesday at the...

Russia says first hypersonic missiles enter service

Russia hit a missile factory in Kyiv: defence ministry

June 27, 2022

Russia said on Sunday its early morning strike on Kyiv had hit a weapons factory, dismissing as "fake" reports that...

Next Post
Northrop Grumman Delivers Global Hawks to US Air Force

Northrop Grumman Maturing Key Triton Unmanned Aircraft Sensor

Latest Defense News

Former NATO chief Javier Solana has coronavirus

Finland, Sweden leaders to discuss NATO bid with Erdogan

June 27, 2022
Canada sends 2 warships to Baltic Sea to bolster security

Canada sends 2 warships to Baltic Sea to bolster security

June 27, 2022
Russia says first hypersonic missiles enter service

Russia hit a missile factory in Kyiv: defence ministry

June 27, 2022
US moves closer to retaliation over hacking as cyber woes grow

Spain warns of possible cyberattack at NATO summit

June 27, 2022
Kyiv says US precision artillery systems arrived in Ukraine

Kyiv says US precision artillery systems arrived in Ukraine

June 24, 2022
US Navy Kicks Off ICEX 2020

Russia and China eye NATO’s ‘Arctic Achilles heel’

June 24, 2022

Defense Forum Discussions

  • The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread
  • New Coronavirus threat
  • Royal New Zealand Air Force
  • Russia and the West
  • New Zealand Army
  • Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
  • Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates
  • Indonesian Aero News
  • Indo Pacific strategy
  • China - Geostrategic & Geopolitical.
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com