Saturday, March 14, 2026
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result
Home Defence & Military News Technology News

Army, UK forces successful in future network interoperability testing

by American Forces Press Service
June 16, 2009
in Technology News
3 min read
0
14
VIEWS

WASHINGTON: Both representatives of the U.S. Army and the United Kingdom’s Ministry of Defence have said recent Army Brigade Combat Team Modernization network interoperability tests between the two partner nations have proven successful.

The recently concluded Multinational Experiment 3.0, held at Fort Monmouth, N.J., tested the ability of the networks of U.K. forces and Army forces to communicate with each other effectively, and to pass data and other messages to each other.

“I thought it was extremely successful,” said Maj. Troy Crosby, Network System Integration Program Office lead. “We actually did more than I thought we were going to be able to do during the experiment. We achieved our objectives and met all of our goals. Overall it was a great success.”

“The experiment went really well,” said U.K. Lt. Col. David Raleigh, R Signals U.K. Ministry of Defence. “We’re into that post-experiments analysis phase. And it was vast amounts of data that was gathered during experiment. We’re looking forward to analyzing the experimental data and then moving forward potentially to an MNE 4.0 next year sometime and taking this a step further.”

Crosby said that during the exercise, subcomponents of the network’s System of Systems, Common Operating Environments, or SOSCOE, performed effectively at communicating information between U.S. and U.K. networks.

“Within the interoperability services, it was able to handle and translate all of the U.K. Ministry of Defence messages pretty seamlessly,” Crosby said. “Obviously, every now and then you get a hiccup, and one of the engineers would have to go back into something, but accuracy rates were extremely high, we were able to take in all their messages and distribute them within the network.”

The SOSCOE is the operating system for the network that will tie together Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance capabilities for all Army Brigade Combat Teams. The interoperability services is one of two portions of SOSCOE that were tested during MNE 3.0. The interoperability services is a suite of services that enables SOSCOE to take in messages from U.S. and joint C4ISR systems and translate them into something that can be distributed within the Brigade Combat Team.

The other major service suite tested as part of MNE 3.0 was the SOSCOE communications services.

“Within that suite we leveraged a lot of information assurance, a lot of the network management,” Crosby said. “A lot of the data passing went through there, mainly to assure that proper transmission and receipt of the information occurred on both sides. It performed rather well.”

Also tested for interoperability at MNE 3.0 was the Army’s Force XXI Battle Command Brigade and Below, or FBCB2. That system is designed, among other things, to allow commanders to differentiate between friendly and enemy forces.

“We leverage that system for call for fires,” Crosby said. Within the experiment, a call for fire was made and the BCT system decided which capabilities, U.S. or U.K., were best able to handle the request.

“At a certain point the decision within the system would be made, who is the most efficient fire affecter to strike that target, and then the message would be given to execute and be carried out,” Crosby said.

For the experiment, the system was configured so the U.K. forces would be charged with handling the request for a call for fire, Crosby said.

“It would then be transmitted to the U.K. network, and at that point the U.K. forces would go ahead and take on that mission and execute it and strike the target,” Crosby said. “It added a little bit of complexity within the technical call for fire thread. But it’s a show to the power of the dissemination of data at that lower tactical brigade and a low level of being able to utilize either nations indirect fire and call for fire support within a battle space environment.”

During MNE 3.0, the Army and the U.K. experimented with exchanging data between various levels of command down to the company level — Crosby said below that would be issues with data throughput availability, and dealing with that challenge was not the focus of the exercise.

“We’re very focused on … can the ones and zeros be passed between the two nations,” Crosby said. “So that is really where we are focused within the experiment we just executed.”

Crosby said the United States is looking into a Multinational Experiment 4.0. with the U.K., possibly in Summer 2010.

Tags: Army & Security Forces Newscommunicationsinteroperabilitynetwork
Previous Post

Army takes new approach to suicide prevention

Next Post

Turkey to buy Russian Mi-28 attack helicopters

Related Posts

US needs top cyber coordinator, better hacker ‘deterrence’

‘Digital fog of war’ around Iranian cyberattacks

March 13, 2026

Hostilities on the digital front have intensified since the outbreak of war between the US, Israel and Iran, with many...

US moves closer to retaliation over hacking as cyber woes grow

Cyberattack Disrupts Operations at MedTech Giant Stryker

March 11, 2026

A cybersecurity incident affecting Stryker Corporation—one of the world’s largest manufacturers of medical devices—has drawn renewed attention to the growing...

Next Post

Turkey to buy Russian Mi-28 attack helicopters

Latest Defense News

US needs top cyber coordinator, better hacker ‘deterrence’

‘Digital fog of war’ around Iranian cyberattacks

March 13, 2026
US military says aircraft crash in Iraq killed 4 crew members

US military says aircraft crash in Iraq killed 4 crew members

March 13, 2026
Northrop Grumman moves to boost B-21 Raider output

Northrop Grumman moves to boost B-21 Raider output

March 13, 2026
US Navy evacuates virus-struck aircraft carrier Roosevelt

US military ‘not ready’ to escort tankers through Hormuz Strait

March 12, 2026
Israel cancels leave for combat units after Iran consulate strike

US says Iran campaign cost $11 billion in six days

March 12, 2026
US moves closer to retaliation over hacking as cyber woes grow

Cyberattack Disrupts Operations at MedTech Giant Stryker

March 11, 2026

Defense Forum Discussions

  • Middle East Defence & Security
  • The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread
  • Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates
  • Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
  • Looking for good book resources
  • USAF News and Discussion
  • Military Aviation News and Discussion
  • Indonesia: 'green water navy'
  • German Bundeswehr
  • Royal Netherlands Navy
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com