Sunday, March 15, 2026
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result
Home Defence & Military News Army News

US To Reduce Impact of Anti-Vehicle Mines

by Editor
November 21, 2006
in Army News
2 min read
0
14
VIEWS

, WASHINGTON: More than a dozen nations have joined the United States in announcing support for a new declaration on anti-vehicle land mines designed to avert unnecessary civilian suffering and speed relief deliveries when conflicts end. 
 
The United States, Australia, Denmark and other nations agreed to endorse a formal declaration to take steps — as part of their national policy — to reduce voluntarily the humanitarian impact of these mines. The agreement took place during the Third Review Conference of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) in Geneva on November 1-17. 
 
Anti-vehicle mines, also referred to as “Mines Other Than Anti-Personnel Mines,” or MOTAPM, typically are found along key supply routes in post-conflict situations, where they hamper relief and medical missions. 
 
There are also numerous reports of anti-vehicle mine explosions killing or maiming unintended civilian targets, such as a March incident in Pakistan when 28 members of a wedding party died in Baluchistan after a tractor hauling them in a trailer triggered a mine. 
 
Ronald J. Bettauer, the head of the U.S. delegation to the conference, said he regretted that consensus could not be reached on a new protocol to the convention creating legally binding commitments on these specific types of mines. 
 
However, Bettauer expressed confidence that additional nations would endorse the declaration. Those committed to the declaration agree not to use anti-vehicle mines outside of a marked perimeter if the mine is undetectable due to minimal metal content. The delineated perimeter should be monitored by authorized personnel or fenced to prevent civilian access. 
 
Endorsing governments also agree not to deploy an anti-vehicle mine outside of the marked area unless the device has a built-in mechanism to self-destruct or neutralize itself. 
 
On a policy basis, endorsing governments also agree not to transfer these mines to any country (or national agency) not authorized to receive them, or if their detection or longevity standards are not spelled out in the declaration. There are exceptions, including the use for training or mine-clearance purposes. 
 
Bettauer said states that have not expressed their intention to apply the policies established by the declaration should seek “to do so as promptly as possible” because of the indiscriminate effect posed by these munitions. 
 
The United States and other nations have been advocating a formal protocol to deal with these mines since 2001 because no international legal instrument currently addresses the land mines' detectability or persistence. Mines that are readily detectable and short-lived sharply reduce the cost and effort of humanitarian mine removal operations. 
 
Bettauer told journalists in Geneva November 6 that the United States has pressed vigorously for the protocol during five years of negotiations. On the eve of the conference's conclusion, he said the United States remains committed to achieving the protocol within the framework of the CCW. The CCW is reviewed every five years. 
 
In a November 16 statement issued by the U.S. Mission to the United Nations in Geneva, Bettauer expressed hope for a changed circumstance in the future making it “possible for governments to join in renewed efforts to adopt a protocol building on the work done over the past five years.” 

Previous Post

First New Navy Patrol Vessel Launched

Next Post

Finnish Navy Orders Warships from Italy

Related Posts

Indonesia Orders Additional CAESAR Artillery Systems

France to send more mobile artillery to Ukraine

February 1, 2023

France will ship 12 more Caesar truck-mounted howitzers and fresh air defence equipment to Ukraine to bolster the fight against...

Leopard tanks to arrive in Ukraine around late March: Germany

Leopard tanks to arrive in Ukraine around late March: Germany

January 27, 2023

Leopard tanks pledged by Germany to help Ukraine repel Russia's invasion will arrive in "late March, early April", Defence Minister...

Next Post

Finnish Navy Orders Warships from Italy

Latest Defense News

US needs top cyber coordinator, better hacker ‘deterrence’

‘Digital fog of war’ around Iranian cyberattacks

March 13, 2026
US military says aircraft crash in Iraq killed 4 crew members

US military says aircraft crash in Iraq killed 4 crew members

March 13, 2026
Northrop Grumman moves to boost B-21 Raider output

Northrop Grumman moves to boost B-21 Raider output

March 13, 2026
US Navy evacuates virus-struck aircraft carrier Roosevelt

US military ‘not ready’ to escort tankers through Hormuz Strait

March 12, 2026
Israel cancels leave for combat units after Iran consulate strike

US says Iran campaign cost $11 billion in six days

March 12, 2026
US moves closer to retaliation over hacking as cyber woes grow

Cyberattack Disrupts Operations at MedTech Giant Stryker

March 11, 2026

Defense Forum Discussions

  • General Information on missile/artillery developments
  • Australian Army Discussions and Updates
  • Middle East Defence & Security
  • Indian Air Force Development discussion
  • Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates
  • Turkey's future weapons
  • The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread
  • Indonesia: 'green water navy'
  • Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force Thread
  • RSN capabilities
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com