You beat me to it.
Well maybe offer them Hunter?
Secretary of the Navy John Phelan announced a "strategic shift" away from the Constellation-class frigate program this week shifting the fleet towards viable alternatives that can be built faster and cheaper.
www.navalnews.com
When the Constellation class was 1st announced Type 26 was NEVER considered, as it "Was not a proven in-service design". The sad thing in all of this is that FREMM would have given the US what they were looking for if they HAD stopped there & taken what they had ordered & literally changed things, bit by bit as the normally do, during service upgrades & refits.
Instead, we have ships that were tendered between 2018 & 2020, orders placed in 2020 & here we are 7 years on in 2025 with ships that will still effectively take at least 3 years to make it to sea for trials & commissioning.
Warships are not cars on a dealership lot, or heavy duty tools from the shelves of your nearest walmart ! They take time, the design needs to be discussed, finessed & agreed before you start cutting steel, as it can take a long time to get parts. THAT is why it makes sense to dove-tail into an already established programme.
The US need to look at what Norway has done with Type 26.
They negotiated a way in to an active production line, have likely agreed to take a 'build-to-print' design, but rather than tweak it by ADDING things (to change it), have probably suggested NOT taking things / leaving spaces empty, but keeping the dimensions of a compartment / cable runs / HVAC, with the intent that THEY can retrofit the equipment that THEY want, once the ship is theirs.
Examining the 'Global Combat Ship' design, for the x4 variants, the one that most closely resembles a US warship is the probably the River Class for Canada. Hunter is a close 2nd, but I think that there's likely to be too much different to make it viable.
As for the Navantia F110 series from Spain, or the Mogami's from Japan, again I think that there will be too much 'different', that the US would want to 'tamper' with them..
Yup, if the US want to build ships 'faster', they should really look at Canada.
But if they do, how will Trump fair with US ships being built in a Foreign Country ???