S-81 Isaac Peral is not fitted with AIP.
S-83 Cosme Garcia, the third sub of the class, will be the first to run the BEST system. When it commissions in 2026.
The Spanish Navy - Armada Española
- Thread starter Gladius
- Start date
S-83 Cosme Garcia, the third sub of the class, will be the first to run the BEST system. When it commissions in 2026.
Antipode
Member
Indeed. Re the S-80+ program:
The first, S-81 Isaac Peral, has already endured intense tests after its commission in 2023, including live torpedo launches recently at SINKEX-25. It has also taken His Majesty Felipe VI to maximum operational depth.
After partaking in DYNAMIC MARINER FLOTEX-25, the crew tied a broom to the sail when entering port, allegedly a sign for "we swept our rivals".
S-82 Narciso Monturiol will probably start sea trials this summer, to be commissioned around summer of 2026.
But S-83 Cosme Garcia, already sporting BEST, is now expected to be commissioned by 2028, and
S-84 Mateo Garcia de los Reyes, by 2029.
BEST AIP has been already fully tested in front of third parties (Indian Navy officers) and apparently results allow for some optimism, after such a strenuous development.
As for the submarine launched missile, it is to be the JSM-SL. Interestingly, confirmation was given recently by the Netherlands Prime Minister when announcing the missile selection for their Orka class submarine program.
I aimed for clean post, kindly ask for any particular and I will source a link.
Cheers!
Spain realising the limitations of STOVL aircraft and/or the risk of overreliance on the US with the F-35B. Now after a dedicated small CATOBAR carrier similar to Charles de Gaulle in size but with conventional propulsion, in addition to a 2nd Juan Carlos (Canberra) LHD. With such an announcement, it seems strange that they were one of the few amongst NATO that rejected the 5% GDP defence spending target implored by Trump.
armyrecognition.com
Spain Eyes Catapult-fitted Aircraft Carrier with Navantia as NATO Urges Greater Defense Investment
Spain Eyes Catapult-fitted Aircraft Carrier with Navantia as NATO Urges Greater Defense Investment
armyrecognition.com
Todjaeger
Potstirrer
Spain realising the limitations of STOVL aircraft and/or the risk of overreliance on the US with the F-35B. Now after a dedicated small CATOBAR carrier similar to Charles de Gaulle in size but with conventional propulsion, in addition to a 2nd Juan Carlos (Canberra) LHD. With such an announcement, it seems strange that they were one of the few amongst NATO that rejected the 5% GDP defence spending target implored by Trump.
Spain Eyes Catapult-fitted Aircraft Carrier with Navantia as NATO Urges Greater Defense Investment
Spain Eyes Catapult-fitted Aircraft Carrier with Navantia as NATO Urges Greater Defense Investment
Per the article, Navantia is doing a feasibility study, which is well short of a CATOBAR being developed never mind ordered and built.
Frankly I would wonder at this point whether Spain could realistically afford the costs of everything involved to make conventional carrier ops successful. Of the western nations, only two have CATOBAR aircraft designs in production and these are the US and France, which among other things means that Spain would quite likely still be very dependent on the US for aircraft anyway, especially since one of the three CATOBAR designs is a different version of the F-35...
There is also the issue of numbers in service and maintaining pilot and crew skills. A single CV is going to provide a capability but only part of the time, since the one carrier will periodically need to undergo training and maintenance cycles. Previous Spanish Armada plans (prior to decommissioning the PdA) had a dedicated STOVL carrier which could get some STOVL ops coverage to at least maintain pilot skill currency by the LHD. However, if the Armada does go to CATOBAR then the JC1 will have no ability to provide any coverage.
Effectively the Armada would need to really have at least two carriers, as well as all the pilots, crew, aircraft, etc. In order to effectively operate modern CATOBAR aircraft, the vessel itself would likely need to be fairly large and also cost several billion Euros for just the ship itself. Looking at the numbers for an Indian order for Rafale M carrier aircraft from this year, there was a $7.4 bil. deal to purchase 26 aircraft, simulators and other associated kit, weapons and logistics support. A single CATOBAR carrier on the smaller side (like a Clemenceau-class) plus fighters to make an air group would likely have a price tag approaching if not past $10 bil.
I am not sure that Spain has really recovered enough economically that it could afford to dump $10 bil. on what could be described as a vanity project.
Correct, but the fact remains..they're looking in that direction. Most likely political fluff
Todjaeger
Potstirrer
Being a feasibility study, I rather suspect that Navantia will get a idea of what the project cost for the ship itself could likely be, possibly based off different carrier sizes and capability or aircraft capacity. Once gov't gets that figure, or it and the cost of the air group, then the idea of a CATOBAR carrier will quietly die. One needs to remember that the Spanish defence budget in 2024 was something like $22 bil. so launching a multi-year project to introduce a new platform and embarked aircraft capability which would require nearly half the entire defence budget would be unlikely IMO.
Yes it’s the RAN thread , but I wonder if any F35b’s have operated off the JS 1 from other allied NATO countries.Spain realising the limitations of STOVL aircraft and/or the risk of overreliance on the US with the F-35B. Now after a dedicated small CATOBAR carrier similar to Charles de Gaulle in size but with conventional propulsion, in addition to a 2nd Juan Carlos (Canberra) LHD. With such an announcement, it seems strange that they were one of the few amongst NATO that rejected the 5% GDP defence spending target implored by Trump.
Spain Eyes Catapult-fitted Aircraft Carrier with Navantia as NATO Urges Greater Defense Investment
Spain Eyes Catapult-fitted Aircraft Carrier with Navantia as NATO Urges Greater Defense Investment
That would surely be the starting point to evaluate the feasibility of the concept with the LHD first ; before going ballistic with fanciful aspirations of a large carrier and all that it entails.
Champagne taste and beer budget me thinks!
Cheers S
John Fedup
The Bunker Group
O/T LHDs and F-35Bs probably can be made to work more or less and are suitable for the Med/Spanish Atlantic coast. Any Spanish CATOBAR project would have to involve a partner (Italy?) IMO. As France wants a CVN, France is out and unless Spain gets on the 5% of GDP train, any future carrier is as well.
It may be they have to look at CATOBAR to rule it out. This is not unheard of tactic.
IMO it may make more sense for Spain to build another LHD, but with F-35B modifications, and retro fit some capability onto its current LHD. This is kinda what Italy has done, retrofitted and existing ship (Cavour) and built a new larger ship. Then acquire a small squad of ~12 F-35B. This would give them two ships, for light operations, but quite capable of self protection or CAS or other networked functions.
Spanish pilots could then also, deploy on UK/Italian/US ships if and required. It would also add significant amphibious capability to Europe.
I would point out that China has a LHD with a catapult, but mostly focused at drone launches. It may be that capability that is of interest and that could feasibly be included on a LHD. Launching and retrieving drones is much more doable. Drones often have smaller, less powerful engines, to maximise range and lowering cost/radar signature, being smaller might make launches tricky. But is assessing that kind of capability, you might start off assessing the current state of CATOBAR capability full stop. Even if you wanted to just set aside space and weight for the capability as a possible future upgrade.
Ananda
The Bunker Group
China going to put more Turbofan UAV in their LHD. That's why they need catapult on their LHD, as I suspect due their LHD did not designed with Skijump. China already prepare set of turbofan design specifically for UAV.
However Turkish Navy plan to operate their Turbofan UAV Kizilelma from Anadolu. Thus remain to be seen whether Juan Carlos skijump can operate large enough turbofan drones, withour catapult. If that happen, perhaps it is shown they don't need CATOBAR. If they don't want to operate J-35B as fixed wing components, perhaps turbofan UAV from their LHD can be compromise answered. Rather then invest to much more expensive catobar carrier.
Italy has ordered 30 F-35B, 15 each navy & AF, & has budgeted for another 10, 5 for each force. AFAIK the air force aircraft should be able to operate from Cavour & Trieste, though not as effectively as the naval ones.
Antipode
Member
The MLU for the F-100/105 will cost approx two thousand million euros. The first contract was approved back in May.
www.infodefensa.com
Specific info about the upgrades is scarce, but it is known it will include CAPTAS-2, MK52 Torpedoes and NSM. They will operate MH-60R.
www.defensa.com
(Source websites have inbuilt translation)
Cheers
Comienza la modernización de las fragatas F-100 de la Armada: 14 millones para actualizar el radar SPY
Es un programa que continúa en fase de planeamiento, pero deberá ser una modernización integral, enfocada en actualizar el sistema de combate, sus sensores y su armamento para hacer frente a ...
www.infodefensa.com
Specific info about the upgrades is scarce, but it is known it will include CAPTAS-2, MK52 Torpedoes and NSM. They will operate MH-60R.
La modernización de las fragatas F-100 de la Armada mejorará sus capacidades de guerra antisubmarina con el CAPTAS 2
El Programa Especial de Modernización (PEM) de las fragatas F-100 de la Armada mejora su potencial antisubmarino con el sistema de sonar de profundidad variable CAPTAS-2
(Source websites have inbuilt translation)
Cheers
John Fedup
The Bunker Group
Attached link describes the difficult choices the Spanish navy faces wrt naval aviation. Really can't see how Spain could afford a new CATOBAR carrier along with the required jets. The Rafale M isn't ideal and its replacement is years off if ever. The F-35B is possible but is costly and its producer hasn't exactly been offering stellar production on upgrades. I gather public opinion in Spain isn't exactly positive regarding Trump America as well. It might be the end is approaching for Spanish naval aviation.
Spain’s Naval Aviation Crossroads: The F-35B, the Harrier, and a Capability Gap - Naval News
Spain’s Naval Aviation Crossroads: The F-35B, the Harrier, and a Capability Gap - Naval News
Sandhi Yudha
Well-Known Member
Worldwide navies have this problem, the Sea Harrier and AV-8B were capable for their time and quite affordable, and the F-35B is often unreachable for financial and/or political reasons.
Some navies can end up like Brazil and Thailand: degrading from a real aircraft carrier navy to a helicopter carrier navy. The only other solution is what Portugal and Turkiye are doing, having a helicopter and UCAV carrier.
And ordering a CATOBAR aircraft carrier from china or France (with J-15 or Rafale-M) is also not attractive for (once again) financial and/or political reasons.
Last edited:
John Fedup
The Bunker Group
The drone/helicopter option would be an affordable option. France's CVN is likely off the table if the CATOBAR solution is desired. Perhaps a GT version could be an option. I assume UK will never modify the QE ships for CATOBAR and sell one off to Spain.
Ananda
The Bunker Group
FERROL nos MOLA | Facebook
www.facebook.com
2nd F-110 Frigate being launch from Navantia facility in Ferrol.
19K views · 260 reactions | ⚓ La F-112 Roger de Lauria ya está en las aguas de la ría de Ferrol Miles de personas acudieron a las instalaciones de Navantia Ferrol en la tarde de este martes para la segunda botadura de la serie de fragatas F-110 par
⚓ La F-112 Roger de Lauria ya está en las aguas de la ría de Ferrol Miles de personas acudieron a las instalaciones de Navantia Ferrol en la tarde de este martes para la segunda botadura de la...
www.facebook.com