Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0

Reptilia

Well-Known Member
Bofors MK4 mounted on/within a 20ft container with the loader inside would be good(if it can take the weight)
The upgraded Mogami may have space for a 20ft container either side of the exhaust, right in the centre of the ship.
Container could be moved from ship to ship when needed.
 

Attachments

John Fedup

The Bunker Group
Missile compartment would not need to be replaced, it would be no different to the 6 or 7-cell all-up round canisters on any Virginia VPT/VPM tube or Ohio SSGN tube, they’re exactly the same diameter and TLAM is far shorter than Trident-II
O/T There is little information comparing the common missile compartment for the Columbia/Dreadnought SSBNs versus the VPM. The CMC has quad packs, 3 for Dreadnought and 4 for Columbia. Designed to accommodate D5 missiles. No idea what modifications would be required for the quad tubes to accept other missiles. Further discussion should be on the AUKUS thread.
 

Antipode

Member
One can only respect naming ships after notable individuals or geographic points. But old school names are hands-down cooler.

By Collins dictionary, in Australian informal speech, a "bolter" can be:

1. An outsider in a contest or race. (That would be Japan).

2. (Historic) An escaped convict or bushranger.

"Bolter class" does have a mean ring to it. Others in the class could be Fencer, Promise, Riposte, Smart, Sufficient. Frigates tended to somehow playful names.

Cheers
 
Top