Welcome to DefenceTalk.com Forum!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

NZDF General discussion thread

Discussion in 'Geostrategic Issues' started by NZLAV, Apr 14, 2007.

Share This Page

  1. ngatimozart

    ngatimozart Super Moderator Staff Member Verified Defense Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    5,452
    Likes Received:
    539
    Location:
    In the rum store
    You need to go a lot further back than 5 pages because there has been significant discussion within this thread about the FASC. The reason why the P-8 was acquired so quickly is because Boeing has told potential users that the production line will be closing sooner rather than later so it's basically final orders please. The RFI for the FASC stated that a multi-tier system was being looked at, but that was all and we have presumed that it is the P-8, a 3rd tier platform such as the B350i for EEZ work, and in the future possibly a HALE or MALE UAV / RPAS for extended long distance over water surveillance. The $20 billion hasn't been budgeted, unfortunately so at present it is an aspiration rather than something carved in stone AND it will not be adjusted for inflation and currency fluctuations etc.

    I think that people are being hung up on the P-3 / P-8 comparison saying that P-8 can't do things that the P-3 can, when in fact the opposite would be closer to the truth. From what I have read since the P-8 has entered USN service, their former P-3 operators wax lyrical about it and the common thread is that it's a whole new ball game. I have read on other forums people criticising the P-8 saying that it can't operate out of airfields that P-3s currently do, or that it can't do SAR like the P-3, or that it can't operate low and slow like the P-3, doesn't have the range etc. The interesting thing is those undertaking that criticism are pontificating without the knowledge or access to all the relevant data. There is reliable open source data on the P-8 and its capabilities; it's just a matter of researching. There is a wealth of P-8 material on DT & not all of it is on the RNZAF thread either.
     
    Ocean1Curse likes this.
  2. beegee

    beegee Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2017
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    79
    Location:
    Colorado
    Where are you getting 16 hour loiter time from? At what range is that loiter time?

    According to US navy website the P-3 has...
    The US Navy -- Fact File: P-3C Orion and EP-3 Aries

    Which is very similar to the P-8's four hours at 1200 nautical miles.
     
  3. Ocean1Curse

    Ocean1Curse Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2013
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Australia
    First of all a thanks to Ngati and others for there time and energy. It is true that I'm disruptive but I am a friend to the NZDF. With out much fuss the P-8A Poseidon and the Future of ASW thread was easy to find no problem.

    And I'm a bit shy on explaining where I got my P-8A information. I'd guess that most of, I'd say 90% of information floating around about the P-8's is complete trash.

    Personally I'v viewed the P-3K as more of an over exertion on the budget considering its past time to retire them.

    Society doesn't deem the FASC as a negative at the moment. What makes open source information trash is the list of negatives can be almost infinite so a complete wast of time and money. Technically I wouldn't have to explain the trash since it would be up to P-8 pilots/crew to explain why they love the P-8. All I would say is it's good to see RNZAF go from a Model T Ford to a Tesla Model S.
     
  4. ASSAIL

    ASSAIL Defense Professional Verified Defense Pro

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2011
    Messages:
    2,574
    Likes Received:
    555
    Location:
    Darwin NT Australia
    IIRC there were comments made here, during the search for MH 370 in the southern Indian Ocean, which told that the P8 was capable of searching nearly twice the area searched by the P3s. My memory is not perfect but if it wasn’t double it was substantially more.
    Any yearning for the Orion is sheer nostalgia.
     
    ngatimozart likes this.
  5. t68

    t68 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2006
    Messages:
    3,253
    Likes Received:
    64
    Location:
    NSW

    I don’t think he’s suggesting that at all, methinks he’s suggesting an alternative going into the future to what is currently operational, as the NZDF is limited to what it can achieve operationally now




    I agree whole heartily that funding & capability must increase if it is to dovetail the future operating concept outlined in previous documents such as the JATF future force 35 and FOC2035. But it’s hard to focus on future equipment that the overall NZDF needs without looking at historical funding over the last 20/30 years.


    But the concept that may need more exploring is if funding/price for a single small 20000t LHD cannot be accommodated, but funds are forthcoming for 1/2 hulls of say some of the size of the Galicia class LPD, those are roughly the same overall size of Canterbury but flexibility offered by 2 hulls is an increase in capability overall than what is currently available. If you had the choice if it were 1 decent sized LHD or 2 Galicia class or similar, I’d think I’d opt for the 2x Galicia hulls






    Agree the 1st tier combat force and the amphibious capability should be looked at in isolation, but that not say that they can’t enhance the overall fire power wether in the area of NGFS or otherwise



    On the Damen LST120,

    I actually have a soft spot for them, they appear to be well thought out with a mix of being able to beach when required or use small landing craft for troop movements, it’s enclosed so equipment is out of the weather and has a deadweight of 1700t just over 3x the weight limit of the old RAN LCH’s the Balikpapan’s. The LCH’s have done long ocean voyages the longest being Brisbane to Penang I belive, not something you’d want to do on a regular basis, it would be interesting to see the LST ocean going capbilty as I’d imagine she would still have a flat bottom for the ability to beach.


    In a New Zealand context I think they have their place pending funding approval, if by chance that the RNZN did get something like the Endurance 170 LHD the LST will actually give some much needed breathing space for operations closer to home that otherwise would not be conducted as the LHD could very well find themselves out of area on an ex or whatever. The LST will actually enhance amphibious/ HADR capabilities of the Navy reducing redundancy of only having one ship available for all tasking
     
    Last edited: Jan 10, 2019 at 2:57 AM
  6. oldsig127

    oldsig127 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2014
    Messages:
    469
    Likes Received:
    105
    Location:
    Brisbane
    That's okay, but be aware that I and many other understand that 99% of the information floating around the Internet without verification is bulldust and folk claiming that they can't provide it (without killing us) are at the sad end of the trustworthiness scale

    oldsig
     
  7. beegee

    beegee Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2017
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    79
    Location:
    Colorado
    Indeed.

    I enjoyed my time working on the P-3Ks in the early 90s, but the P-8 is such a huge step up in capability it's not funny.
     
    Cadredave likes this.
  8. Rob c

    Rob c Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Messages:
    759
    Likes Received:
    49
    Location:
    Marton NZ
    I have 4 problems with the P8 purchase,
    1. I would have prefered an AESA radar for it's stealth and anti jamming ability. with a mechanical sweep radar anyone with ECM/ESM will know you are coming before you get into detection range.
    2. I would have liked to see more air awareness built in as per the Indian navy, this is probably the only region that the K2 has an advantage.
    3. we did not get enough of them.
    4. we did not get enough of them.
    But seriously, it is a huge step up and coming to Ohakea will be good for my region.
     
    Last edited: Jan 11, 2019 at 6:34 PM
    tongan_yam and kiwipatriot69 like this.
  9. ngatimozart

    ngatimozart Super Moderator Staff Member Verified Defense Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    5,452
    Likes Received:
    539
    Location:
    In the rum store
    Agree with 3 & 4. Regarding No 1 & No 2., I think that is to change over time with new capabilities to be added to the P-8 fleet (USN, RAAF, RAF & RNZAF) gradually. Not all of the P-8 capabilities have been fitted and / or released yet.
     
  10. Rob c

    Rob c Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Messages:
    759
    Likes Received:
    49
    Location:
    Marton NZ
    Yes agreed, as time goes on improvements could, and in MHO should cover these areas.
     
  11. Todjaeger

    Todjaeger Potstirrer

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    4,584
    Likes Received:
    356
    Location:
    not in New England anymore...
    The Advanced Airborne Sensor (APS-154) is an AESA which has been fitted to USN P-3C Orion aircraft and IIRC P-8A Poseidon aircraft as well. It is the follow-on to the APS-149 Littoral Surveillance Radar System (LSRS) which also utilized an AESA.

    With respect to being detected by AEW, unless one is in a LO aircraft, they should expect to be detected by the AEW while they are still well out of range.
     
  12. Rob c

    Rob c Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Messages:
    759
    Likes Received:
    49
    Location:
    Marton NZ
    Sorry for the confusion, I had a senior moment and wrote down AEW when I meant ECM/ESM. Most modern combat aircraft and ships and subs have have such detection ability, in the subs case on one or more of their masts. Yes the ASP154 has been fitted externally to the P8 but is not a normal fitment to the standard aircraft and what I would like to see is the aircrafts normally fitted radar be changed in time for an AESA type of radar. This will eliminate it's radar output signature and make jamming of the radar almost impossible. It also makes detection of the AESA transmitting aircraft by hostile radars more difficult as it will fudge the return signal.
     
    Last edited: Jan 11, 2019 at 6:40 PM
  13. t68

    t68 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2006
    Messages:
    3,253
    Likes Received:
    64
    Location:
    NSW

    Hi Mr C

    Well it’s nearly they end of the silly season, I have been eagerly awaiting your rebuttal to get another point of view. I hope your fully recharged till the next silly season
     
  14. 40 deg south

    40 deg south Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2013
    Messages:
    1,005
    Likes Received:
    49
    According to a 7 Jan posting on the RNZN facebook page, Te Kaha is due back in NZ in December 2019. It's not clear on whether Te Mana will not enter the upgrade process until then, or whether we will temporarily have a no-frigate navy.
     
  15. beegee

    beegee Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2017
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    79
    Location:
    Colorado
    Just because a radar is electronically scanned rather than mechanically scanned doesn't mean it's output signature is eliminated. Where are you getting that from? The beam still needs to scan, which means it's still detectable by anything it hits.
     
  16. ngatimozart

    ngatimozart Super Moderator Staff Member Verified Defense Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    5,452
    Likes Received:
    539
    Location:
    In the rum store
    And from what I understand it's the quickness and randomness in its frequency hopping agility that is important.
     
  17. Rob c

    Rob c Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Messages:
    759
    Likes Received:
    49
    Location:
    Marton NZ
    I would suggest that you read up on AESA radar, Basically in simple terms the radar frequency skips at more than 1000 times a second from each cell and each transmitting cell ( each AESA panel has hundreds or thousands of these) transmits at a different frequency, this means that there are hundreds of thousands or even millions of transmissions each second on different frequencies and each individual transmission on a frequency is so small that they are less than the background radio noise that is always present and therefore are hidden in this background noise. this is what makes AESA virtually impossible to detect or jam.
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2019 at 6:42 PM
  18. beegee

    beegee Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2017
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    79
    Location:
    Colorado
    If the transmission is less than the background radio noise how does it detect the reflection from the target, which is an order of magnitude lower than the transmitted pulse?

    Please post your info source.
     
  19. Rob c

    Rob c Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Messages:
    759
    Likes Received:
    49
    Location:
    Marton NZ
    The transmission itself is not less than the background, It is the minute individual bits that are spread over a wide frequency range that are, as I pointed out. I researched this early last year and and the year before, as an interest and don't have copies of sources as the hard drive on my computer failed. However I did post on this subject sometime ago and I think that may have indicated sources. As I suggested before, why don't you do a little research yourself as it is not hard and to be quite frank, I am getting a little tired of this. I have more interest in my great grandkids than continuing this. Try Goggle though you will have to go deeper than Wikipedia.
    Another thing to think about is why do all stealth aircraft have AESA radar, answer, because if they used conventional radar they would not be stealthy as soon as they turned their radar would they.

    I did a 30 second look on the internet and found a very simple article that may help you.
    Understanding AESA: A Game-Changer in RADAR Technology
     
    Last edited: Jan 13, 2019 at 6:53 PM
  20. ngatimozart

    ngatimozart Super Moderator Staff Member Verified Defense Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    5,452
    Likes Received:
    539
    Location:
    In the rum store
    @Rob c & @beegee manners please gentlemen. No duelling at dawn. Rob we aren't allowed to eat our enemies any more as combat rations :(