North Korean Military.

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
In my search for reliable information on the matter I often ran into mysterious references to the MBT-2002, which is supposedly a stripped down T-72 variant with retrofitted T-90 parts.
 

PullerRommel

New Member
Im sure the North Koreans would rely heavily on there winter as some form of natural defense. Waht tactics do you think there infantry would adopt? Would they stay with there "launch waves of people at ROK-US lines"?
 

eckherl

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
In my search for reliable information on the matter I often ran into mysterious references to the MBT-2002, which is supposedly a stripped down T-72 variant with retrofitted T-90 parts.
Why would they have to strip down a T-72 to retrofit T-90 parts, and what parts are you referring to.
 

eckherl

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
Im sure the North Koreans would rely heavily on there winter as some form of natural defense. Waht tactics do you think there infantry would adopt? Would they stay with there "launch waves of people at ROK-US lines"?
If a war breaks out between both countries either side will make it happen during the winter months when the ground and most rivers are frozen.
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
Here's the rumors on the new tank that I found.

www. atimes.com/atimes/Korea/DG06Dg01.html

english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200206/200206170010.html

www. encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-136652432.html

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P%27okpoong-Ho#Production_history

I left a space between the www. and the rest of the address. When c&p don't forget to get rid of the space, and to add http:// before the address.
 

eckherl

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
Here's the rumors on the new tank that I found.

www. atimes.com/atimes/Korea/DG06Dg01.html

english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200206/200206170010.html

www. encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-136652432.html

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P%27okpoong-Ho#Production_history

I left a space between the www. and the rest of the address. When c&p don't forget to get rid of the space, and to add http:// before the address.
Ah - good old Wiki, I would not put much stock into that rumor, there is a reason why they went to Iran for their reactive armor suite that is placed on the Chonmaho, most likely due to cost of Russian K5 packages and the reluctance of Russia just wanting to sell it to them, also they do manufacture there own 100mm and 115mm tank ammunition and I cannot see them wanting to gear up for 125mm due to the cost factor. Heavy tanks for North Korea hasn`t really been a top priority for them due to the terrian which will cause major choke points.
 

T-Rex

New Member
North Korea will not start another war because it does not enjoy the support of China or Russia as it used to during the cold war. Besides, the North Korean leader is simply too fond of his dynasty, he is not going to spoil all that for the glory of his nation. This is how most communist dictators are. Recently the discovery channel showed one documentary of one famous FBI agent (who was the leader of one fake communist party in America and he was given awards by the Soviet leaders for his contribution to the communist movement), this agent had passed on to Washington how scared the Soviet leaders were of a war between then Soviet Union and the US. The US took advantage of this key information and won the cold war. Perhaps someone can find out and post the name of this FBI agent, I've written it down somewhere.
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
The DPRK is not communist. At best it's a strange form of socialism. At worst it's a paranoid third world dictatorship with a command economy. Juche and songun are actually, in my modest opinion, anti-communist.

EDIT: I'm sorry for breaking the no politics rule but in this case it's very important to understand the concept of songun. It has far more influence on the development of North Korea then any marxist theory, and songun prioritizes the military as the main driving force behind everything.

Here's an interesting and fairly objective paper on the subject.
http://wwwkeia.org/Publications/OnKorea/2008/08Park.pdf
 

Firehorse

Banned Member
..upgrades in the PAC-3 Patriot missile defense system have improved protection for critical U.S. facilities in South Korea.
"However, there is a significant shortage of PAC-3 missiles currently available on the peninsula to counter the North Korean missile threat," ..North Korea maintains 70 percent of its ground forces within 90 miles of the Demilitarized Zone that has separated the peninsula on the northeastern coast of Asia since the Korean War ended in an armistice, not a peace settlement, in 1953. The DMZ is 30 miles (50 kilometers) north of metropolitan Seoul, South Korea's bustling capital area of more than 20 million people.
North Korea has 250 long-range artillery systems capable of reaching the capital, Sharp said.
"North Korea still has the capacity to inflict major destruction and significant military and civilian casualties in South Korea with little to no warning," Sharp wrote.
On the missile defense question, Sharp wrote, "North Korea continues to build missiles of increasing range, lethality and accuracy, bolstering its current stockpile of 800 missiles for its defense and external sales."
In a flurry of missile testing in mid-2006, North Korea tested an intercontinental ballistic missile in July that is said to have had the capability of reaching U.S. territory.
South Korea "does not currently possess a ballistic missile defense capability" that can join seamlessly with U.S. defensive missiles. Sharp wrote.
It is urgent that South Korea develop such a system, Sharp wrote and added: "South Korean military and civilian facilities are currently highly vulnerable to North Korean missile attacks."
http://wiredispatch.com/news/?id=113787
So, is this a rela threat or just a call to join US-Japan TBMD and order more PAC-3s for the ROK?
 

t68

Well-Known Member
North Korea will not start another war because it does not enjoy the support of China or Russia as it used to during the cold war. Besides, the North Korean leader is simply too fond of his dynasty, he is not going to spoil all that for the glory of his nation. This is how most communist dictators are. Recently the discovery channel showed one documentary of one famous FBI agent (who was the leader of one fake communist party in America and he was given awards by the Soviet leaders for his contribution to the communist movement), this agent had passed on to Washington how scared the Soviet leaders were of a war between then Soviet Union and the US. The US took advantage of this key information and won the cold war. Perhaps someone can find out and post the name of this FBI agent, I've written it down somewhere.
That might be one factor, but it was my understanding that it was manly economics that caused the melt down of the iron curtain.
President Reagan went on a military spending spree of a six hundred plus ships for the US Navy alone, the Russians just could not keep up with dollars be spent on the US Defense machine ,it put to much pressure on it own economic systems to compete.

Regards,
tom
 

swerve

Super Moderator
That might be one factor, but it was my understanding that it was manly economics that caused the melt down of the iron curtain.
President Reagan went on a military spending spree of a six hundred plus ships for the US Navy alone, the Russians just could not keep up with dollars be spent on the US Defense machine ,it put to much pressure on it own economic systems to compete.

Regards,
tom
The Soviet economy was slowing down before Reagan was elected. The pressure wasn't so much from military spending (though that did consume a hell of a lot of resources, & certainly made things worse) as from the inefficiencies inherent in trying to run a modern(ish) economy by central planning. Note that other Soviet-bloc countries were having similar, or even more severe, economic problems at lower levels of military spending than the USSR.
 

windscorpion

New Member
Demographics also had a big part to play in the SU's downfall, with it's big knockon effect on the economy and social structures. A problem Russia still has to this day.
 

windscorpion

New Member
No. Some time ago i read an article which stated the CIA were predicting the SU downfall because of demographic pressures, one of their long range forcasts they made in the early 70s. Unfortunately i didn't keep the article but it might be out there somewhere on the internet :D
 

swerve

Super Moderator
No. Some time ago i read an article which stated the CIA were predicting the SU downfall because of demographic pressures, one of their long range forcasts they made in the early 70s. Unfortunately i didn't keep the article but it might be out there somewhere on the internet :D
IIRC that was due to high Central Asian birthrates, not population decline.
 

Chrom

New Member
IIRC that was due to high Central Asian birthrates, not population decline.
Ah, usual western myths...

1. Everything was ok with demographic in USSR. Central Asian republic had certainly higher birthrates, but again this was not a problem.

2. USSR defense spending was in constant decline (in % to economic) for the last 40 years. So in essence, Reagan initiatives did not caused USSR to spend more, but they MIGHT prevent USSR to spend less - which ofc still influenced economical and political situation in bad way.

3. Economy in USSR is certainly slowed down in later 70x - early 80x, but the economic growth still remained in-line with western block economy growth - in fact, it still even remained slightly higher.

4. The USSR (and east block) collapse was caused by propaganda... You can try to read eastern block newspapers of that time and see how idiotic and unrealistic, portrayed much better than it is, western society was described. For which idiotic and unrealistic imaginary deficiencies eastern society was bashed...

Simply put, after 70 years peoples forgot what it means - capitalistic society. They forgot all its disadvantages, and seen only easy-to-see advantages of richest 1st world countries - i.e. Germany, France, USA. Even Italy or Spain already lived worse on average than DDR , USSR or Chechoslovakia.

5. That said, there was bad economical problems in eastern block, cased partially by planned economic (but also many problems solved by it), but mainly by suppressing small and middle-size private enterprises. State owned market network and light industry simply couldnt compete with private-owned companies, which were needed in millions. There is a reason why in many capitalistic countries there are state owned oil, aircraft, military, auto, etc corporations present, but i dont know single (capitalistic) country where state owned small market or light industry corporations play any significant role.

6. ") North Korea dont have any chances and will not start any war. Kim live pretty well and he will not want to end up as Saddam - what is certain outcome of any NK war with SK supported by USA.
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
I disagree about the causes of collapse. People in Russia weren't protesting for the sake of capitalism. They were protesting for the sake of democracy. What they got instead was capitalism.
 

Chrom

New Member
I disagree about the causes of collapse. People in Russia weren't protesting for the sake of capitalism. They were protesting for the sake of democracy. What they got instead was capitalism.
Haha! Good one! Only one problem - in collective eastern block mind (stupidly) democracy = capitalistm. Or, better to say, Western paradise = democracy + capitalism. So most peoples didnt opted for just democracy or capitalism - they wanted things exactly as they were in the West. But not in the real West - in the imaginary West, pictured partially by western propaganda, partially by they own wild dreams, partially by they own leaders lies.

They wished democracy just as in USA - without even remote understanding or knowledge about what it is - a democracy in USA. They wished capitalism just as in USA - again, without even remote knowledge what it means. They filled all these pretty words with own dreams. They couldnt see disadvantages of western society. But they could perfectly see disadvantages of own society, especially amplified by western and own propaganda.
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
Exactly. It wasn't hostile propaganda, stupid leaders or anything like that. It was millions of ordinary people that all simply pulled each in their own direction.
 
Top