Indonesia: 'green water navy'

Arji

Active Member
I didn't ask, sorry. Tesco has a contract for three KCR-60, and I pretty much assumed that they all will share the same specification. However, I didn't actually ask and verify. My bad.

The Tesco KCR-60 will use ADVENT Combat Management System from Havelsan of Turkiye. I am somewhat concerned that they are not using Tecma for uniformity among all the KCR-60, but at least Advent follows NATO standard protocol so the new (batch 3?) KCR-60 will be able to integrate with the older batch 2 KCR-60.

Edit 2:
View attachment 49853
Sorry about the lighting. They put a spotlight right on top of the wall display and there is no good angle where the light isn't reflecting directly into the camera without cutting off the top part. Still, if you click on the thumbnail and get the original resolution, the words and numbers are readable.
Are the Turkish system able to integrate with Exocet?
 

deadlast

Member
Not all will be using Oto Marlin 40mm.
Hope Indian version of 40mm will used interchangeable ammo with Marlin 40mm. I believe @deadlast that put in this thread before how Navy ammo has interchangeable issue even when they come from same caliber.
Yep, L&T Teevra 40 and OTO Marlin 40 are based on Bofors 40mm L/70 gun, they all use the same 40x364mmR cartridges. The other 40mm in navy inventory is the old Bofors 40mm L/60 guns on current KRI Teluk Bintuni & Sibarau-class, using 40x311mmR cartridges.

Btw, on Leonardo press release we are also mentioned as the user of the Marlin 40 twin barrel,
....
The Navy’s inventory includes Leonardo’s Marlin 30, Marlin 40 Twin Barrel and 76/62 SuperRapid. The latter is the best-selling medium-caliber naval gun mount available on the market, employed by 60 Navies and already installed on 15 Indonesian Navy vessels.
....


Leonardo provides latest-generation Marlin 40 naval defence system to Indonesia
The last time twin barrel 40mm gun (then Dardo) were mentioned, it was rumored to be installed on the LPDs.
 

tonnyc

Well-Known Member
Are the Turkish system able to integrate with Exocet?
I didn't ask. Tesco wouldn't know anyway. I should be asking Havelsan but I didn't hear that the new batch will be using Havelsan's CMS until after I left. FWIW the CMS should use NATO standard protocols. The website claims it's compliant with Link 11, Link 16, and so on. So it should work with Exocet since that also uses NATO standards.
 

Ananda

The Bunker Group

Reading on this clearly LEN involvement with Thales on Tacticos as CMS on various TNI-AL surface fleets still going strong presently and in future. So I just speculating in here that perhaps future CMS for Primary combatan will used Thales Tacticos stuff and Secondary combatan will used Havelsen Advent as CMS

Yes some upgrade program already used Terma C-Flex CMS, but still as TNI is not big on uniform, however at least either Terma, Thales, or Havelsan all are using NATO Euro based system. So either way they supposed can still talk to each other.

Even so call LEN indigenous CMS Mandhala is based on their work with Thales. Either way I do see Havelsan will have to work with LEN, and LEN already working with Thales for long time and seems also in future.

The working base environment with Thales involved quite big range of Electronics, Sensors Communications and Radars environment. So despite this new deal with Havelsan, I see this not as TNI-AL going to use more Havelsan stuff in future, but more on 'economics' consideration.

As deadlast already point out that Oto 40mm and L&T 40 mm using same ammo and based on same tech, thus seems economics that drive why some use Oto and other use L&T 40mm.
Hopefully this combo of Tacticos, C-Flex, Advent or even future iteration of LEN Mandhala still basically based on similar system. Thus like in 40mm, it is just matter of pricing consideration.

On that perhaps expectations on more expensive Thales stuff will going to be used on more expensive primary assets.

Add:
Some local forum and blogs call asside future KCR, also the OPV will use Advent. They also talk on Arrow 140 will use Advent. We'll see about that on the Frigate. I do still think the Frigate will still based on Thales stuff but the OPV and KCR either used Havelsan or Terma.
 
Last edited:

Ananda

The Bunker Group
There's an article published by the minDef just recently that lists all the contracts agreement signed with Turkiye, and it mentions explicitly Frigate CMS I believe... along with that brand new Turkish Anti Ship Missile.
Well that's dissapointing. We don't know yet how is the progress with FREMM, and Arrow 140 more or less presently the only Frigate program that's have money trail back it up already. Using Turkiye system or even Turkiye weapons, means they are cutting cost on the program.

I'm not going to say Turkiye system and armament are less capable then French ones, but certaintly less proven. For sure is more 'economics' (cheaper just to blatant).
 

Ananda

The Bunker Group

Jane's put article that talk PAL CEO claim the first cut steel for first Arrowhead 140 based Frigates will be held this month. This's after rumours the first steel cut will happen in August coincide with Indonesian independence month. He claim the program call "Fregat Merah-Putih" or Red-White Frigate program.

I like they way this administration officials goes image building and call their program "Red and White" even tough the design or even the building block still imported. Never mind, when you call it "Merah-Putih" it is fitting for image 'Karya Anak Bangsa" (indigenous design).

Anyway let's see which systems and armament they will put in that Frigates in the end. Talking on Turkiye missiles :


This Turkiye media talk basically asside Khan Long Range MLRS (I put it in Indonesian Army thread), Roketsan also make agreement with Indonesian SOE defense companies for Atmaca SSM and Hisar Based SAM system. The SAM system will be call TriSula (Trident) as it will be 'tailor'/bespoke made for Indonesian requirements, with some different systems then existing Turkiye ones.

So what Arji put on this Turkiye SSM getting traction in MinDef all round agreement with Turkiye. Does Turkiye really win big on Indo Defence. Understandable, Turkiye need customers for their blooming defense industry. Thus seems they are willing to work on perhaps generous pricing and some bespoke requirement adjustment.
 

Arji

Active Member
The SAM system will be call TriSula (Trident) as it will be 'tailor'/bespoke made for Indonesian requirements, with some different systems then existing Turkiye ones.
Honestly, I think this just means Hisar on Tatra trucks, maybe Czech radar.
 

Ananda

The Bunker Group
think this just means Hisar on Tatra trucks, maybe Czech radar.
Well the Retia Radar system basically need bespoke arrangements by Roketsan to be combined with their Hisar based systems. We can speculate why MinDef want to combine it with Retia Radar system and not original Turkiye Radar system on their present operational Hisar SAM system.


Still it's in the end a bespoke arrangements, as you need more adjustment work to combine different suppliers systems.
 

swerve

Super Moderator
This taken from TNI-AL official video. The video actually shown commissioning of LPD based Hospital Ship from PAL. However after ceremony there's demo of this KCR 60 (FMB 60) build by one of Indonesian Private Yard Tesco Indo Maritime.
Seeing the references to Tesco feels odd. It's the biggest supermarket chain in the UK - hhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesco
 

Ananda

The Bunker Group

I do wonder on trade mark ownership can be a dispute, if someday their business operation ever come a cross. Right now the chances is very slim considering they are working in different industry and circle.
 

Sandhi Yudha

Well-Known Member

Reading on this clearly LEN involvement with Thales on Tacticos as CMS on various TNI-AL surface fleets still going strong presently and in future. So I just speculating in here that perhaps future CMS for Primary combatan will used Thales Tacticos stuff and Secondary combatan will used Havelsen Advent as CMS

Yes some upgrade program already used Terma C-Flex CMS, but still as TNI is not big on uniform, however at least either Terma, Thales, or Havelsan all are using NATO Euro based system. So either way they supposed can still talk to each other.

Even so call LEN indigenous CMS Mandhala is based on their work with Thales. Either way I do see Havelsan will have to work with LEN, and LEN already working with Thales for long time and seems also in future.

The working base environment with Thales involved quite big range of Electronics, Sensors Communications and Radars environment. So despite this new deal with Havelsan, I see this not as TNI-AL going to use more Havelsan stuff in future, but more on 'economics' consideration.

As deadlast already point out that Oto 40mm and L&T 40 mm using same ammo and based on same tech, thus seems economics that drive why some use Oto and other use L&T 40mm.
Hopefully this combo of Tacticos, C-Flex, Advent or even future iteration of LEN Mandhala still basically based on similar system. Thus like in 40mm, it is just matter of pricing consideration.

On that perhaps expectations on more expensive Thales stuff will going to be used on more expensive primary assets.

Add:
Some local forum and blogs call asside future KCR, also the OPV will use Advent. They also talk on Arrow 140 will use Advent. We'll see about that on the Frigate. I do still think the Frigate will still based on Thales stuff but the OPV and KCR either used Havelsan or Terma.
I understand that to spread risks and because of budget limitations the navy has to accept different brands, but a chinese CMS, a Danish CMS and a Turkish CMS in one single class (KCR-60) is maybe a little bit too much.



Here an interesting new video from Rheinmetall, it shows us the Oerlikon Millennium 35 mm in action together with the Oto Melara 76 mm gun on board the KRI R.E. Martadinata 331.




Edit...
Thales signed a contract with PT Len to undertake the refurbishment of the integrated mission systems for all four Diponegoro-class ships.

Delivered in 2007-2009, these ships will soon be refurbished with an Integrated Missions System including the TACTICOS Combat Management System, as well as the latest in software-driven radar technology able to combat the highest level of threats. So from which i understand, these SIGMA 9113 corvettes will keep their MW08, Lirod Mk.2 and other systems from Hollandse Signaalapparaten.

It seems to be similar with programme undertaken for the KRI
Usman-Harun 359 Multi-Role Light Frigate/Korvet in 2020.
 
Last edited:

Meriv90

Active Member
I think going Turk what you are losing is not so much "proven" missiles or offensive weapons, but you would be loosing on the EM suite. An aspect that a lot overlook on the ships equipment.
If not wrong we (Italians) and the French we learned our lesson trough the Marine conflict between Israel and Egypt where in the 60s the ECMs played a central role.
 

Ananda

The Bunker Group

Well seems PAL FB page confirming what MinDef pages put, that the Frigate Program they are running (Arrowhead 140 derivative), will use Havelsan CMS. Question will be on the rest of sensors and armament.

Anyway one of Indonesian defense enthusiats instagram call GID.NEWS (similar in name only with one of Russian defense online channel), put this online:

photo (1).jpg

Online enthusiats claim this is the design on 143M Frigate that already got approval from Babcock as license owner and "consultant" on this project. The Banner has PAL printed on it at the bottom part. So seems it is something that officially coming from them.

For one thing this design seems more make sense then the model PAL shown in their booth during last Indo Defence. Hope this is the real design that already got Babcock approval. Since PAL already said to media the first steel cut ceremony will begin soon, lets see how the real design turn out.

The sensors seems shown Thales work tough, then again could be Turkish ones. Turkiye forum shown Havelsan design that shown similarities with Thales ones (at least from exterior).
 
Last edited:

STURM

Well-Known Member
I think going Turk what you are losing is not so much "proven" missiles or offensive weapons, but you would be loosing on the EM suite.
The Turks have been making sound progress in this field. There's a lot of indigenous R/D conducted and they've employed quite a bit of EW in Libya and Syria.

we learned our lessont trough the Marine conflict between Israel and Egypt where in the 60s the ECMs played a central role
It played a critical role in a series of naval engagements fought between Syria and Israel in 1973. The Israelis were very successful in jamming/decoying the seeker heads of Syrian Styxs.
 

Arji

Active Member
Word is they went back to Babcock's original design, but assuming that banner @Ananda posted is true, it will have a length of 143 m. Is there anything to gain from the increase in length, from what was supposed to be 138 m?
 

Ananda

The Bunker Group
Is there anything to gain from the increase in length, from what was supposed to be 138 m?
I'm no naval designer, but if the graphic in that banner is the final design, then Babcock seems agree to lengthen mid ship section by adding a least one section. This I suspect increase the volume of mid section. Area that supposedly by design being call for multipurpose modules. Including sections for armaments.

Still if Babcock agree on inserting one additional module on mid section, I do suspect Babcock and PAL are making adjustment on other sections to compensate the balance.

No news yet on first cut steel ceremony yet which supposedly this month. Will see whether that 143m is final length. Other rumours call 140m length, and even that already some adjustment from basic 138m design.
 

Sandhi Yudha

Well-Known Member

Well seems PAL FB page confirming what MinDef pages put, that the Frigate Program they are running (Arrowhead 140 derivative), will use Havelsan CMS. Question will be on the rest of sensors and armament.

Anyway one of Indonesian defense enthusiats instagram call GID.NEWS (similar in name only with one of Russian defense online channel), put this online:

View attachment 49867

Online enthusiats claim this is the design on 143M Frigate that already got approval from Babcock as license owner and "consultant" on this project. The Banner has PAL printed on it at the bottom part. So seems it is something that officially coming from them.

For one thing this design seems more make sense then the model PAL shown in their booth during last Indo Defence. Hope this is the real design that already got Babcock approval. Since PAL already said to media the first steel cut ceremony will begin soon, lets see how the real design turn out.

The sensors seems shown Thales work tough, then again could be Turkish ones. Turkiye forum shown Havelsan design that shown similarities with Thales ones (at least from exterior).
The design on this banner really looks like the original Iver Huitfeldt design, complete with HSA's SMART-L and APAR radars. Comparing with Turkish TF-2000 destroyer design, Havelsan's radar systems look different.


I'm no naval designer, but if the graphic in that banner is the final design, then Babcock seems agree to lengthen mid ship section by adding a least one section. This I suspect increase the volume of mid section. Area that supposedly by design being call for multipurpose modules. Including sections for armaments.

Still if Babcock agree on inserting one additional module on mid section, I do suspect Babcock and PAL are making adjustment on other sections to compensate the balance.

No news yet on first cut steel ceremony yet which supposedly this month. Will see whether that 143m is final length. Other rumours call 140m length, and even that already some adjustment from basic 138m design.
The mid section extension can indeed be used for the installation of more VLS-cells and/or the storage of the missiles. I expect it can also be used for the storage of more fuel or for prayer rooms.
 

Redlands18

Well-Known Member
I'm no naval designer, but if the graphic in that banner is the final design, then Babcock seems agree to lengthen mid ship section by adding a least one section. This I suspect increase the volume of mid section. Area that supposedly by design being call for multipurpose modules. Including sections for armaments.

Still if Babcock agree on inserting one additional module on mid section, I do suspect Babcock and PAL are making adjustment on other sections to compensate the balance.

No news yet on first cut steel ceremony yet which supposedly this month. Will see whether that 143m is final length. Other rumours call 140m length, and even that already some adjustment from basic 138m design.
Type 31 - Babcock International
The Babcock site has the Type 31 as 138.7x19.8x5.0m. you are going to get people who will round that down to 138x19x5m, some will give the exact figures, some will round it up to 139x20x5m and some will say nearly 140m long and nearly 20m wide all using the same figures and it all makes it sound like 2 different designs. There is, also 2 different lengths used for ships, length between perpendiculars, from the Rudder to where the ship cuts the water and overall length.
 

Ananda

The Bunker Group
I believe the leghth they are talking in here is LOA and not LWL. The rumours on the design will be 140+m or 143+m, comes on TNI-AL volume specs that want something bit bigger then 138+m basic design of Iver and Type 31.
 
Top