Indian Navy (IN) News and Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

funtz

New Member
So as far as current projections of aircraft carriers go - we should have 2 of them by 2012 with Mig-29k and LCA Naval (god willing) and Dhruv on board , not a perfect scenario but one deployed and eat and west costs would be significant deterrents.
The way things have been progressing, it seems a bit too early to say that.
2012 time line is set on the ship leaving for trials by 2010 i think, lets see what happens.
LCA naval might have to wait around considering the issues with the program.
 

Firehorse

Banned Member
From DefenceTalk.com

Naval Forces
Russia's New Nuclear Attack Submarine Starts Sea Trials

http://www.defencetalk.com/news/publish/index.php
Oct 29, 2008

Vladivostok, Russia: The Amur shipyard in Russia's Far East said on Monday it had started sea trials of a newly built nuclear-powered attack submarine, which according to media reports may be leased to India.
The construction of the Akula II class Nerpa nuclear attack submarine started in 1991 but has been suspended for over a decade due to lack of funding. Akula II class vessels are considered the quietest and deadliest of Russian nuclear-powered attack submarines.
"The submarine, built under a contract with the Russian Defense Ministry, has been moved from the shipyard in Komsomolsk-on-Amur to a maintenance facility in the Primorye Territory and fitted with all necessary equipment. At present it is undergoing sea trials," a spokesman for the shipyard told RIA Novosti.
Indian media have reported on various occasions that the construction of the submarine was partially financed by the Indian government. India has reportedly paid $650 million for a 10-year lease of the 12,000-ton submarine.
According to Indian defense sources, Nerpa is expected to join the Indian navy under the designation INS Chakra in the second half of 2009.
The submarine will not be equipped with long-range cruise missiles due to international restrictions on missile technology proliferation, but India may later opt to fit it with domestically designed long-range nuclear-capable missiles. [Don't they jointly develop CMs?]
However, a spokesman for the Amur shipyard earlier said that Nerpa differed considerably from the previous Akula-class submarines.
"Our Nerpa is fitted with more sophisticated navigation, sonar, and hydraulic systems," he said.
Russian state officials have categorically denied reports of a possible lease of a nuclear submarine to India.
Asked in late September to comment on media reports on alleged plans to export nuclear submarines, in particular to India, Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov said: "The press discusses lots of things. We do not export nuclear submarines."
India previously leased a Charlie I class nuclear submarine from the Soviet Union from 1988 to 1991.
Russia recently handed over to India the INS Sindhuvijay diesel-electric submarine after an extensive overhaul at a shipyard in northern Russia.
Meanwhile,
"The ex-Gorshkov will be launched soon. At the end of October the installation of engines and other heavy gear will start." Nice picture-
http://www.ng.ru/nvo/2008-10-22/100_avianosets.html

I wonder, besides for the AW, will it carry any AShMs?
 
Last edited:

funtz

New Member
India rejects Russian aircraft carrier price demand
By Radhakrishna Rao

ndia's finance ministry has for the second time rejected a proposal from the nation's defence ministry to approve an additional $1.2 billion in funds to complete a retrofit project to the decommissioned Russian aircraft carrier Admiral Gorshkov.

Moscow had originally agreed to deliver the modernised vessel for $1.5 billion, but demanded the additional payment after citing factors including an underestimation of the level of work required at its Sevmash shipbuilding yard.

India, which has already paid Russia two-thirds of the original programme cost, has made no further payments since January 2007, and the 44,500t carrier's expected delivery date has slipped from 2009 until at least 2012. The finance ministry's latest decision also stemmed from a request to allocate $60 million to perform sea trials of the refurbished vessel during 2011.

The Indian navy has ordered 12 RSK MiG-29K fighters and four MiG-29KUB trainers to operate from the ex-Russian navy ship.
http://www.flightglobal.com/article...ts-russian-aircraft-carrier-price-demand.html


This is not going to be resolved before the next government (2009-2010 budget), meanwhile russia might have to spend from its own pocket (will they be willing to?).
 

aaaditya

New Member
hey guys,great news here ,fincantieri of italy is to build a 27500 ton fleet tamker for the indian navy.

here is the link and the article:

http://www.yourindustrynews.com/fincantieri+to+build+new+fleet+tanker+for+the+indian+navy_14194.html

Fincantieri to Build New Fleet Tanker for the Indian Navy

Thursday, Oct 30, 2008

On the occasion of the international exhibition Euronaval – the most important trade fair for the defence industries currently in progress in Paris-Le Bourget – Fincantieri has announced the company has gained an order to build a fleet tanker for the Indian Navy.

Following previous orders to Russian industries, this is the first order for a surface vessel for which India has chosen a foreign company, Fincantieri, which competed to win the order against leading international players, especially from Russia and Korea.

The vessel, which will be built at the shipyards in Liguria, for delivery at the end of 2010, will be 175 metres long, 25 wide and 19 high and will have a displacement at full load of 27,500 tonnes. The ship will be powered by two 10,000 kW diesel engines which will enable it to reach a maximum speed of 20 knots and its propulsion system will feature an adjustable blade propeller. There will also be a flight deck on board for medium-heavy helicopters (up to 10 tons).
The ship will accommodate up to 248 passengers – crew and supplementary personnel.

Equipped with double hatches, the vessel will be able to service four ships at the same time.

In accordance with the new Marpol regulations of the International Maritime Organization concerning the protection of the environment, this will be the first ship of this type to be built with a double hull thereby improving protection of the fuel tanks and avoiding the risk of pollution in case of collision or damage.

Fincantieri has already built the “Sagar Nidhi” for India, an oceanographic vessel for the National Institute of Ocean Technology (NIOT) in Madras which was delivered at the end of 2007. In addition, in 2004 the company drew up two contracts with Cochin shipyard regarding the design of the engine, technology transfer and the provision of complementary services for the construction of the Air Defence Ship (ADS); activities are also in the process of being finalized for the sharing of the functional design and details of the propulsion system. The assistance stage at the Indian shipyard is about to start up shortly.

In order to better service the Indian area, Fincantieri has set up a permanent, representative office in New Delhi.

Commenting on the order, Giuseppe Bono, Fincantieri C.E.O., said: “This further, important order confirms that the Indian market is strategic for our company, as it should be seen within the framework of a process of growing internationalization of our activities and a return to the military export market.”

In view of the experience Fincantieri has gained in the construction of this vessel type, both for the Italian Navy and for a number of foreign navies, the company has recently been admitted, together with another three yards, to the final stage of the tender for the high prestige British programme MARS (Military Afloat Reach and Sustainability), which involves the construction of six fleet replenishment tankers for the Royal Navy.

In view of such a significant order, and to consolidate its presence on the British market, Fincantieri has recently formed an alliance with NSL (Northwestern Shiprepairers and Shipbuilders Ltd), a British yard specialized in ship repair, conversion and military refit.

NSL has built some of the Royal Navy's finest vessels including HMS Ark Royal along with the first guided missile destroyer and a number of submarines, and is today a prime contractor to the Royal Fleet Auxiliary (RFA) Service.
 

aaaditya

New Member
hey guys,strange news here,the chinese naval chief is on a visit to india and is likely to visit the karwar naval base and the dabolim naval base.

here is the link and the article:

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...e_on_first-ever_visit/articleshow/3660608.cms

NEW DELHI: In a first ever visit by a Chinese Navy chief to india , Admiral Wu Shengli will arrive in New Delhi on Saturday. He is slated to hold discussions with defence minister A K Antony and his Indian counterpart Admiral Sureesh Mehta to boost military confidence-building measures.

This comes at a time when India and China are jostling for the same strategic space in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR) to secure their energy and other needs. India, of course, does not want this "competition" to escalate into "conflict".

With China on course to acquire aircraft carriers, the one capability lacking in its otherwise potent naval force, its Navy chief is especially keen to get a first-hand look at India's operation of 'INS Viraat' and its Sea Harrier jump-jets.

"Apart from holding talks with Antony and Admiral Mehta during his visit from November 1 to 5, he will be visiting the Western Naval Command at Mumbai, the naval airbase at goa and the upcoming naval base at Karwar," said an official.

Indian and Chinese armed forces have been incrementally building up their military ties, which in December 2007 led to the first-ever joint counter-terrorism exercise between the two armies at Kunming, with the return exercise planned at Belgaum in India this December.

Apart from other concerns, India remains worried about strategic moves by China in maritime domain. In keeping with the "string of pearls" strategic construct, China is forging linkages with eastern Africa, Seychelles, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Myanmar and Cambodia, among others, in a bid to encircle India.

[Mod edit]aaaditya, this message is not only for you, but also others posting in a similar style. Yours is merely the latest example.

I'd like to remind you that posts should contain your own input. Please read the forum rules, particularly rule 2. We expect some decent commentary rather than a de facto RSS news ribbon feed.

PJI[/Mod edit]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

ASFC

New Member
NSL has built some of the Royal Navy's finest vessels including HMS Ark Royal along with the first guided missile destroyer and a number of submarines, and is today a prime contractor to the Royal Fleet Auxiliary (RFA) Service.
WRONG!

NSL did not build Ark Royal (Swan Hunter did), although I will give NSLs predcessors credit in building Type 42s and Nuclear Subs-but that was a long time ago (infact their last sub was an Upholder, now with the CF's, about 15 years ago).
 
Last edited:

Firehorse

Banned Member
http://www.flightglobal.com/article...ts-russian-aircraft-carrier-price-demand.html
This is not going to be resolved before the next government (2009-2010 budget), meanwhile russia might have to spend from its own pocket (will they be willing to?).
I got a gut feeling that this ship will end up in the Russian Pac.Fleet, and India will be compensated with other Russian weapons/favorable contracts. India will have to keep her older CV sailoring on for extra few years before a new one is built. BTW, does Thailand really needs her carrier/Royal Yacht? With all the turmoil there I'm surprised that India hasn't offered to buy it!
 

irtusk

New Member
i know the Kitty Hawk for India has been repeatedly been shot down, but what about the Tarawa?

- it's not a super carrier so less security and balance of power issues
- it's more 'right size' for india (crew complement of less than 1000 vs 5600+ for the KH)
- it has amphibious capabilities
- excellent disaster relief facilities
- it's longer than the Viraat (ex-Hermes)
- it's 20 years newer than the Viraat
- it's being decomissioned in a few months
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
I got a gut feeling that this ship will end up in the Russian Pac.Fleet, and India will be compensated with other Russian weapons/favorable contracts. India will have to keep her older CV sailoring on for extra few years before a new one is built. BTW, does Thailand really needs her carrier/Royal Yacht? With all the turmoil there I'm surprised that India hasn't offered to buy it!
I seriously doubt the Russian gov. has the money to procure, refurbish, deploy, arm, train pilots for, and use for that ship. Not to mention India has already 1) Signed the Fulcrum contracts. 2) Agreed to purchase the additional aircraft under option. It really doesn't look likely.
 

funtz

New Member
I got a gut feeling that this ship will end up in the Russian Pac.Fleet, and India will be compensated with other Russian weapons/favorable contracts. India will have to keep her older CV sailoring on for extra few years before a new one is built. BTW, does Thailand really needs her carrier/Royal Yacht? With all the turmoil there I'm surprised that India hasn't offered to buy it!
I think that should be a really acceptable way for both parties involved. India gets the money (+fine) back Russia gets the carrier.

From the looks of it, the gorshkov will be the last second hand carrier, or one manufactured outside india.
 

funtz

New Member
i know the Kitty Hawk for India has been repeatedly been shot down, but what about the Tarawa?

- it's not a super carrier so less security and balance of power issues
- it's more 'right size' for india (crew complement of less than 1000 vs 5600+ for the KH)
- it has amphibious capabilities
- excellent disaster relief facilities
- it's longer than the Viraat (ex-Hermes)
- it's 20 years newer than the Viraat
- it's being decomissioned in a few months
US is not offering these systems to IN, even if they did I dont think the navy will get any more funds for any such purchase programs.

The indian navy is looking at development of a Mistral type of platform.
 

Salty Dog

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
US is not offering these systems to IN, even if they did I dont think the navy will get any more funds for any such purchase programs.

The indian navy is looking at development of a Mistral type of platform.
The USA does not "offer" systems. Countries have to send a "request". We will never know if any transfers can occur unless a "request" is made.

Further to this, "requests" are generally "classified" to begin. Once in the approval process within the US government, they are generally made public.
 

StevoJH

The Bunker Group
WRONG!

NSL did not build Ark Royal (Swan Hunter did), although I will give NSLs predcessors credit in building Type 42s and Nuclear Subs-but that was a long time ago (infact their last sub was an Upholder, now with the CF's, about 15 years ago).
Cammell Laird (NSL) built two aircraft carriers called HMS Ark Royal, one in the late 1930's, and one in the 1950's.
 

swerve

Super Moderator
The USA does not "offer" systems. Countries have to send a "request". We will never know if any transfers can occur unless a "request" is made.
But the formal process you describe can be - and often is - initiated by the USA. A "request" can be - and very frequently (mostly?) is - in response to an offer, accompanied by very heavy marketing, from a US firm, which will previously have ascertained that there is no objection in principle to it selling the goods. If I, as head of the air force of US ally or neutral country X, let it be known that I have a requirement for n fighters, do you honestly think there will not be approaches from LM & Boeing salesmen (with the approval of the relevant US authorities) very soon afterwards?
 

ASFC

New Member
Cammell Laird (NSL) built two aircraft carriers called HMS Ark Royal, one in the late 1930's, and one in the 1950's.
Well it did not state which Ark Royal, and as Ark Royal V was completed 50 yeas ago, then how is it an indication of the quality of the yards work when the workforce will have changed?
 

funtz

New Member
The USA does not "offer" systems. Countries have to send a "request". We will never know if any transfers can occur unless a "request" is made.

Further to this, "requests" are generally "classified" to begin. Once in the approval process within the US government, they are generally made public.
All the well then, does not seem to be any chance of that happening.(IN sending a request).

The IN has a Austin Class(ex-USS Trenton), which seemed to have procured for throw away prices, chances of going for a similar one seem to be more realistic.
'The Indian Navy has expressed interest in the USS Nashville. Congress has not yet approved the ship for transfer (sale). That is likely to happen next year and we can then begin negotiations,' Lt. Gen. Jeffrey Kohler, director of the US Defence Security Cooperation Agency, told reporters here.
http://www.indiaenews.com/india/20070714/60707.htm
 

Salty Dog

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
But the formal process you describe can be - and often is - initiated by the USA. A "request" can be - and very frequently (mostly?) is - in response to an offer, accompanied by very heavy marketing, from a US firm, which will previously have ascertained that there is no objection in principle to it selling the goods. If I, as head of the air force of US ally or neutral country X, let it be known that I have a requirement for n fighters, do you honestly think there will not be approaches from LM & Boeing salesmen (with the approval of the relevant US authorities) very soon afterwards?
You are correct that US contractors must have a US Government commercial licensing permission prior to marketing major defense equipment (MDE) to a specified country overseas. In the case of MDE, such as fighter aircraft, these can only be sold abroad via the Foreign Military Sales (FMS) system which only responds to a letter of request (LOR), which in the case you describe would be a formal request for proposal or RFP by country X. As in all FMS, all purchases are via the US Government (Department of Defense) and not the contractor. No doubt that contractors will be all over the Country X in marketing, but in the USA case, there are guidelines they must follow. Bottom line is the request process must be formally initiated by country X, there is never any "offer".
 

Salty Dog

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
The IN has a Austin Class(ex-USS Trenton), which seemed to have procured for throw away prices, chances of going for a similar one seem to be more realistic.

http://www.indiaenews.com/india/20070714/60707.htm
This a yet another FMS process, however in this case is probably considered under "excess defense articles" (EDA). There is no price for sale of the ship, just costs for transfer and administration. EDA is formally requested by any eligible country and must have US Presidential approval prior to the transfer.
 

swerve

Super Moderator
You are correct that US contractors must have a US Government commercial licensing permission prior to marketing major defense equipment (MDE) to a specified country overseas. In the case of MDE, such as fighter aircraft, these can only be sold abroad via the Foreign Military Sales (FMS) system which only responds to a letter of request (LOR), which in the case you describe would be a formal request for proposal or RFP by country X. As in all FMS, all purchases are via the US Government (Department of Defense) and not the contractor. No doubt that contractors will be all over the Country X in marketing, but in the USA case, there are guidelines they must follow. Bottom line is the request process must be formally initiated by country X, there is never any "offer".
I think you've missed the point. There are two distinct processes here:
1) the formal request-offer process.
2) the marketing process.

How many times do you think 1) follows 2)? Very often, I think.

Saying there is never any "offer" may be true, but only for a limited, technical, meaning of the word "offer". In normal usage, the informal proposals firms make before a formal request is issued would certainly be considered offers. The USA (considered both as a collectivity, & the government considered as one entity) is entirely passive in the model you describe, only reacting after a potential customer has initiated contact, but you cannot believe that is what actually happens.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top