It has taken Canada 15 years to dumb down the JSS concept into a Berlin class ship. The Mistrals would rust out at the wharf before our government could make a decision, like they did with the Victoria purchase.France were originally planning for 4 Mistrals.
I would have thought that Canada might be a little bit interested. Singapore have expressed some interest in a acquiring a vessel of that type.
A real longshot would be NZ buying one to replace the troubled Canterbury ... but the price would have to really good for that to happen.
And let's not forget that the project costs about three times as much as the same did for Germany. So you better budget around five billion dollars to buy those Mistral...It has taken Canada 15 years to dumb down the JSS concept into a Berlin class ship.
Exactly right about the cost of building the Berlin class in Canada, should have outsourced the build to S Korea like the UK did with the Tide class. The savings would go a long way to buying a Mistral from France but politics force a local build. Canada could not build a complex warship of this size so it would never happen even if the money could be found.And let's not forget that the project costs about three times as much as the same did for Germany. So you better budget around five billion dollars to buy those Mistral...
Let's get back to the real world here. Russia is not going to sink/recapture the Mistrals from a first world country, if France hands them over to one... that's an act of war, and not against a tiny pushover like Ukraine.South Africa was looking for a LHD as I recall. It would certainly be useful to have something like this based in Africa.
Africa (other than North Africa) is a long way to deploy ships from most of the rest of the world.
Its one of the few places it could go where the Russians wouldn't be tempted to sink/recapture it.
Crossing threads, maybe they could sell them as the flagships of the new Scottish Navy.Let's get back to the real world here. Russia is not going to sink/recapture the Mistrals from a first world country, if France hands them over to one... that's an act of war, and not against a tiny pushover like Ukraine.
Also, according to CAST, the Vladivostok Mistral left port with Russian sailors on board.
bmpd - "
I had a sinking feeling someone would propose that...Crossing threads, maybe they could sell them as the flagships of the new Scottish Navy.
Too soon?
I don't know What's possible particularly when the French are involved . I know the Russians would rather see her scuttled than in NATO colours. I'm not saying they will sink her after handed over to the mighty Scottish navy. The French have plenty of experience on sinking a ship and no one finding out who did it.Let's get back to the real world here. Russia is not going to sink/recapture the Mistrals from a first world country, if France hands them over to one... that's an act of war, and not against a tiny pushover like Ukraine.
Also, according to CAST, the Vladivostok Mistral left port with Russian sailors on board.
bmpd - "
Is there enough Scotch whiskey on hand as it will likely be the only means to pay for a Mistral?Crossing threads, maybe they could sell them as the flagships of the new Scottish Navy.
Too soon?
I have a feeling Russia would be ok with that, just to spite Britain.Crossing threads, maybe they could sell them as the flagships of the new Scottish Navy.
Too soon?
1x ScottishIs there enough Scotch whiskey on hand as it will likely be the only means to pay for a Mistral?
Haha, given that Scotland accounts for roughly one tenth of the the UK population/public spending the most we could afford would be a couple of frigates and maybe a support ship. You know, just enough to defend our stocks of whisky, cod and shortbread.Is there enough Scotch whiskey on hand as it will likely be the only means to pay for a Mistral?
Out of those three nations only the Phillipines makes sence, NZ doesn't need one despite what some think, South Korea has there own, the Dokdo Class, which I'm sure they can build quicker and cheaper than a Mistral.Why not provide financing/pledges to nations of need such as NZ, the Phillipines, and South Korea and float the Mistrals there to US allies.
He does? That's news to everyone involved.Putin has his land Bridge now to the Crimea
PN is facing recruitment and manpower issues. I don't think they will have the capability to operate such a ship soon - as of now, there's already issues manning the recently acquired frigates.Out of those three nations only the Phillipines makes sence, NZ doesn't need one despite what some think, South Korea has there own, the Dokdo Class, which I'm sure they can build quicker and cheaper than a Mistral.
To everyone uninvolved too... :He does? That's news to everyone involved.
Well let's be fair, it's primarily a question of the political will and perception of western intentions. Russian troops could be in Nikolaev, inside of a week, if the decision is made.Including a couple of million or so people living between his troops & the Crimean border.
Wake me up when he's captured Mariupol, Berdyansk, Genichesk & the coast in between. At the moment, his troops & their local allies are well over 300km by road from the nearest land crossing. It's like saying the German army has captured Calais, when its units drive through Aachen.