Latest activity
-
Oold faithful replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.Ueah I get that, but imagine 50% of our armour moving northby rail, and the train derails, tipping over the assets. At least by road...
-
Oold faithful reacted to StevoJH's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with
Like.
Railways may be an easy target to hit, but difficult to do a lot of damage to and relatively quick to repair. Impossible to secure... -
SStevoJH replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.Railways may be an easy target to hit, but difficult to do a lot of damage to and relatively quick to repair. Impossible to secure...
-
Jezza reacted to old faithful's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
The Japanese option would be my choice , without even looking at it! Throw another fast build mogami in with the deal! -
Tasman reacted to StingrayOZ's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
Wasn't that part of the mission that the Japanese were using the previous class of ships for. Although these days I presume its less... -
Sandhi Yudha reacted to personaldesas's post in the thread The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread with Like.
Some odd scenes from the battlefield military exercise https://x.com/gustiiz31/status/2106062916088918189 -
RThe F-16 and its later variants is an affordable and effective platform. The F-35 for many nations is unaffordable. Its cost of...
-
Oold faithful replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.A railway is a prety easy target, in war or peace. Even floods effect them here in the top end. I worked for halliburton in the early...
-
SStampede replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.The subject of the Canberra Class not entering a combat zone I find somewhat perplexing. It’s just a vessel, no different to a Cape...
-
Sswerve replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.Japan's never called an LHD, or any other kind of amphibious ship, a destroyer. It called four helicopter carriers, two of them ASW...
-
Oold faithful replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.A lot bigger than i thought!
-
Oold faithful reacted to Reptilia's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
Specs look good, similar to the previous class. Length - similar to Mashu, 220m+? Beam - similar to Mashu, 25m+? Weight - 14,500t...
-
Except they can’t keep up with a carrier. Only do 22 knots, and it would be difficult to get much more out of that hull shape. -
Oold faithful replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.The Japanese option would be my choice , without even looking at it! Throw another fast build mogami in with the deal!
-
spoz replied to the thread US Navy News and updates.Except they can’t keep up with a carrier. Only do 22 knots, and it would be difficult to get much more out of that hull shape.