Canada is in an awkward situation with the F-35. The 16 on order is barely enough for a single squadron. The cost of maintaining such a small fleet sounds like it could be a logistical nightmare. The 40/80 mix suggested in the article would give Canada at least some economy of scale while not being entirely dependant on the whims of the USA. Problem is that for all the discussion of getting Gripens you have to wonder if they are really the sort of aircraft you would want to be flying in the 2050s and beyond. There is GCAP on the horizon but that is still 10 - 15 years away.Defence spending increase could mean Canada buys more than 88 fighter jets, says RCAF general
As I was saying.
That "16/72 split" talk was ridiculous anyway.
As I said it is an akward position for Canada to find itself in.