Welcome to DefenceTalk.com Forum!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

US Navy News and updates

Discussion in 'Navy & Maritime' started by AegisFC, Jul 3, 2008.

Share This Page

  1. ASSAIL

    ASSAIL Defense Professional Verified Defense Pro

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2011
    Messages:
    2,942
    Likes Received:
    1,037
    Location:
    Darwin NT Australia
    P8 numbers are only one facet of BAMS when discussing the narrative of replacing the entire capability provided by the P3’s.
    The proposed 117 P8 platforms are complimented by G550 Gulfstreams, RQ4 Global Hawks and 68x MQ4C Tritons.
    Further apart from Australia and Britain, Tritons have also been proposed for India and Germany.
    Given that a P8 can cover nearly double the area covered by a P3 I would opine that the aforementioned “shortfall” does not exist.
     
    aussienscale likes this.
  2. ASSAIL

    ASSAIL Defense Professional Verified Defense Pro

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2011
    Messages:
    2,942
    Likes Received:
    1,037
    Location:
    Darwin NT Australia
    The “Australian” (sorry can’t link) reports this am that a Saudi Airforce Second Lieutenant shot four and injured eight at NAS Pensacola.
    He was in the US undergoing training and the incident occurred in the classroom areas.
    Help with the link please.
     
  3. oldsig127

    oldsig127 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2014
    Messages:
    603
    Likes Received:
    195
    Location:
    Brisbane
    ABC TV reports say he killed three and was shot dead by responding police, of whom two are numbered in the injured. Otherwise they agree. Don't have a link to the Oz though this is News Ltd

    Four dead in US Navy base shooting

    oldsig
     
  4. Ananda

    Ananda Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2008
    Messages:
    2,058
    Likes Received:
    355
    Here’s what you need to know about the US Navy’s new deadly (and expensive) attack subs

    An article on defensenews on Virginia Block V. It's going to be equipped with 6 VLS tubes of 4 in mid section of 7 SLCM and 2 in the bow as current Virginia of 6 each. That's make 40 SLCM. Plus more quiter but more importantly can reach USD 35 bio for 10 boats. That's about the costs range of SSBN.

    This more intrigued me, with the price of Ford supercarrier and now this Virginia Blk V, something has to give in my opinion. I read an analyst review (forgot from where originated) that talk about whether in future USN still can afford 10-11 CBG.
    He talk about 8 supercarrier and 8 LHD equipped F-35B will be more efficient for USN in order for them to still afford to get the amount of Surface Ships and Submarines they are planning.

    Reading the prices of Blk V, perhaps that analyst opinion could have some merits. Looking to Chinese conditions, despite the bragging of Chinese ten cents army of 6 CBG, I really doubt China can afford more than 4 effective CBG in foreseable future anyway (their current Carrier plus the new indigenous one are both STOBAR, thus can be rules out from calculation on effective CBG).
     
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2019
  5. John Fedup

    John Fedup Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    4,390
    Likes Received:
    375
    Location:
    Vancouver and Toronto
  6. FormerDirtDart

    FormerDirtDart Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2011
    Messages:
    301
    Likes Received:
    47
  7. ngatimozart

    ngatimozart Super Moderator Staff Member Verified Defense Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    6,963
    Likes Received:
    1,500
    Location:
    In the rum store
  8. ngatimozart

    ngatimozart Super Moderator Staff Member Verified Defense Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    6,963
    Likes Received:
    1,500
    Location:
    In the rum store
    Last edited: Dec 21, 2019
  9. ngatimozart

    ngatimozart Super Moderator Staff Member Verified Defense Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    6,963
    Likes Received:
    1,500
    Location:
    In the rum store
    Looks like the White House intends to reject the USN plans to recapitalize its sealift ships because it sees the USN plans as expensive and not cost effective. White House poised to blow up US Navy’s plans to recapitalize its aging sealift ships. This could place the ability of the US to deploy large quantities of troops and equipment overseas in times of crisis in jeopardy.

    The Pentagon, Office of the SECDEF, proposes cutting 5 of the 12 planned DDG-51 Flt III new builds and accelerating the decommissioning all of the 13 Ticonderoga CGNs. Pentagon proposes big cuts to US Navy destroyer construction, retiring 13 cruisers. This would occur during fiscal years 2021 - 25 and reduce the number of hulls in the USN from 293 of today to 287 in 2025. At the same time, the USN has proposed decommissioning the first 4 LCS in a plan driven by the Office of the SECDEF. US Navy proposes decommissioning first 4 LCS more than a decade early. This appears to be a cost cutting measure. So much for a 355 ship navy.
     
  10. seaspear

    seaspear Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2018
    Messages:
    313
    Likes Received:
    24
    Location:
    Melbourne
    It could be interesting to speculate on which countries may want to take one or two of these LCS off the U.S.N hands ,the ability to carry a rotary aircraft like Firescout and relativly low manning could make it tempting
     
  11. MrConservative

    MrConservative Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2007
    Messages:
    2,660
    Likes Received:
    804
    Location:
    Behind a Desk
    A couple of things make me kind of skeptical with respect to the "proposal" of cutting surface combatant numbers. Firstly, there is the usual Pentagon political positioning for more funding allocation with the OMB whereby they choose to announce suggested cuts as a marker for what they want. It says as much in the article by David Larder as per his usual theme regarding the LCS reduction.

    The memo amounts to a back-and-forth between the Defense Department and OMB on areas of disagreement inside the DoD’s 2021 budget request, which has yet to be finalized.

    The Office of Management and Budget is part of the Executive so yes technically under the White House. However they have an auditing and cost control role and it is there job to reality check departmental spending prior to the Defence Budget and all other USA Govt budgets being set.

    Quite rightly they the OMB are blasting the Common Hull Auxiliary Multi-Mission Platform at a per unit cost of USD$1.3 billion ($2B in Kiwi) for a Sealift and Support ship that was already supposed to cost an already over-priced $1 billion. So on one hand the Pentagon is squawking about cutting Cruisers, Destroyers and the the first 4 LCS yet on the other it is proposing wildly expensive sealift vessels.
     
    ngatimozart likes this.
  12. the concerned

    the concerned Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    386
    Likes Received:
    4
    Why can't they build the flight iii burke's to replace the cruisers and flight i's on a one for one basis. You are still cutting the cruisers just at a managed pace. The other bonus is transferring personal rather than losing them.
     
  13. ngatimozart

    ngatimozart Super Moderator Staff Member Verified Defense Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    6,963
    Likes Received:
    1,500
    Location:
    In the rum store
    That's too logical.
     
  14. Todjaeger

    Todjaeger Potstirrer

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    4,887
    Likes Received:
    539
    Location:
    not in New England anymore...
    Not entirely IMO. The Tico's (being cruisers as the USN now defines them...) have a command role or at least the potential for one, since there is space aboard for an admiral and staff to be embarked. Not sure about the Flight III Burke's, but the earlier batches did not have such space and apparently the CIC would get rather cramped/crowded if the extra personnel associated with an admiral and their command functions were shoehorned in.
     
  15. ngatimozart

    ngatimozart Super Moderator Staff Member Verified Defense Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    6,963
    Likes Received:
    1,500
    Location:
    In the rum store
    You could put the brass hats with the scrambled eggs and all their clingons on the CVNs. With today's C3 is there a need for them to be aboard a DDG at all?
     
    aussienscale likes this.
  16. ngatimozart

    ngatimozart Super Moderator Staff Member Verified Defense Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    6,963
    Likes Received:
    1,500
    Location:
    In the rum store
  17. the concerned

    the concerned Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    386
    Likes Received:
    4
    I would be pretty sure this flight I burkes would find a new home. They are still capable
     
  18. Redlands18

    Redlands18 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2015
    Messages:
    741
    Likes Received:
    165
    Location:
    qld
    Who with?
    Yes they would be capable Ships but they would be 30yo+ at the time of sale, req a large crew by modern standards, 90 VLS Cells are not cheap to fill. It would not be easy to raise, train and sustain crews. I would doubt the only export customer, Japan would be interested, i doubt the usual customers for 2nd hand Ships would be interested, just too expensive to Crew and Arm them.
     
  19. Todjaeger

    Todjaeger Potstirrer

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    4,887
    Likes Received:
    539
    Location:
    not in New England anymore...
    There would also be the question of whether or not the SPY-1 arrays and racks/terminals loaded with the Aegis CMS would be included, and if they were included who the US would be comfortable with having them. IMO it would be unlikely that any of the nations currently fielding Aegis and SPY systems would be interested.
     
  20. ngatimozart

    ngatimozart Super Moderator Staff Member Verified Defense Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    6,963
    Likes Received:
    1,500
    Location:
    In the rum store
    I can't see Japan wanting them either, because their current crop of DDGs are newer and better than the DDG-51 Flt 1. A 30 year old hull that's been thrashed after 18 years of war and not maintained, is going to cost a fortune to bring the hull and machinery back up to standard before undertaking upgrades, then maintain, operate and crew.