Welcome to DefenceTalk.com Forum!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

United States Defense Thread

Discussion in 'Geostrategic Issues' started by ngatimozart, Jan 20, 2018.

Share This Page

  1. barney41

    barney41 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2014
    Messages:
    370
    Likes Received:
    14
    Location:
    Manila
    Maybe Putin will.whisper in Trump's ear that he could save billions by foregoing a new US bomber or SSBN? He could save enough money to build a Southern and Northern wall.
     
  2. John Fedup

    John Fedup Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    4,207
    Likes Received:
    329
    Location:
    Vancouver and Toronto
    Don’t think his vacation state Florida would be happy with a Northern wall, no “snowbirds” spending tourist
    dollars wouldn’t be good for the state economy. Then again, I doubt he cares.
     
  3. barney41

    barney41 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2014
    Messages:
    370
    Likes Received:
    14
    Location:
    Manila
    Just kidding on the wall, of course but my Spidey sense is tingling this is an elaborate ploy for Putin to mess with US strategic forces by "negotiating" with a compliant POTUS. We already know what would happen if he had his way with NATO. Fortunately, it looks like the Senate is growing .spine on Syria/Afghanistan and should go ballistic on a NATO withdrawal.
     
  4. John Fedup

    John Fedup Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    4,207
    Likes Received:
    329
    Location:
    Vancouver and Toronto
    Hopefully the Senate starts to stand up to some of his impulsive and dangerous actions. Given his bizarre behaviour with Putin, it is no wonder many suspect his financial dealings with Russians is the heart of his wimpish interaction with Russia.
     
  5. barney41

    barney41 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2014
    Messages:
    370
    Likes Received:
    14
    Location:
    Manila
    While the Senate requires a supermajority to ratify a treaty, there is apparently no explicit prohibition to the POTUS terminating a treaty. The Supreme Court did not act on the matter the one time the issue was elevated to them so it's sort of a grey area. AFAIK iBush is said to have withdrawn from the ABM Treaty w/o asking for Senate approval. Would Trump unilaterally withdraw from NATO? He just may be brazen and desperate enough in w/c case the recent Senate vote on Afghanistan/Syria withdrawal should be considered a shot across his bow. IMO Congress would not stand for it and would pass a veto-proof law prohibiting him from doing so.
     
  6. John Fedup

    John Fedup Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    4,207
    Likes Received:
    329
    Location:
    Vancouver and Toronto
    I wonder about American public support for NATO should economic conditions take a downturn. Trump could easily turn the EU’s minimal defence spending as a wedge issue in the next election and hype a NATO exit. Probably as likely as an impeachable conviction in the Senate.
     
  7. Ranger25

    Ranger25 Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2012
    Messages:
    717
    Likes Received:
    39
    Location:
    Si Vis Pacem. Para Bellum

    Let’s stay on track and keep petty political opinions out of this please.
     
  8. Feanor

    Feanor Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2008
    Messages:
    15,487
    Likes Received:
    202
    Location:
    Under your bed. No seriously, take a look.
    Unlikely. And I don't think they're being genuine given their unwillingness to substantiate their accusations. Previously the US pointed at the 9M729 missile as the offender. Russia recently demonstrated this missile publicly, and it appears to be exactly what they say - a 9M728 derivative with larger payload and a new guidance system, with even slightly reduced range (480kms vs 490). Following this, the US merely stated that they're already stated their position and are essentially waiting for Russia to unilaterally dismantle the 9M729 missiles. Pavel Podvig was has a decent breakdown of it.

    Moscow shows the 9M729 missile and its launcher - Blog - Russian strategic nuclear forces
     
  9. ngatimozart

    ngatimozart Super Moderator Staff Member Verified Defense Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    6,557
    Likes Received:
    1,202
    Location:
    In the rum store
    JohnFedups post is somewhat sarcastic yes, petty no. However given the current divisive state of US politics, he does have a valid point about the possible future in US - NATO relations, given the present President's track record. You might be sensitive to criticism of your President, however to the rest of the world .... well maybe that's best left unsaid.
     
  10. Preceptor

    Preceptor Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    Messages:
    1,764
    Likes Received:
    44
    Location:
    Grindstone
    At present essentially all US politics are petty. With that reality in mind, I'd feel much more comfortable if everyone kept discussion away from US politics here on DT, regardless of where a member might fall on the political spectrum. We Mods already have enough to do without DT members having to compete with political troll farms and/or botnets bashing one US political party or the other, and so on.
    -Preceptor
     
    Ranger25 likes this.
  11. barney41

    barney41 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2014
    Messages:
    370
    Likes Received:
    14
    Location:
    Manila
  12. Systems Adict

    Systems Adict Defense Professional Verified Defense Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2006
    Messages:
    1,005
    Likes Received:
    111
  13. MrConservative

    MrConservative Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2007
    Messages:
    2,583
    Likes Received:
    711
    Location:
    Behind a Desk
    ngatimozart likes this.
  14. John Fedup

    John Fedup Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    4,207
    Likes Received:
    329
    Location:
    Vancouver and Toronto
    The acting secretary of defence has withdrawn his name thus eliminating what would likely have been a brutal confirmation hearing. Also, he has resigned as acting secretary due to family reasons. Trump's list of "acting secretaries" illustrates the vetting problem but also the lack of qualified people willing to serve in his administration. Trump also seems to be drifting away slightly from Bolton, likely a positive for many in the uniformed services.
     
  15. FormerDirtDart

    FormerDirtDart Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2011
    Messages:
    287
    Likes Received:
    31
    It's an utter mess. Shanahan was never even officially nominated for the job. After the President publicly recommended him for the position, no one ever bothered to submit the actual nomination to the Senate.
    Also, if Sec. Esper is nominated to be the "actual" Secretary of Defense by law he'll need to withdraw from the "Acting SecDef" position as soon as he's nominated. So, yet another Acting SecDef would need to be named during the confirmation process.
    Plus, there's still the possibility that SecNav Spencer may have to resign (or be fired) because of that stupid promise/bet he made that the damned electromagnetic ammo elevator would be up and working by sometime last month (it's not)
    So, technically right now the US military has an Acting Secretary of Defense, an Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense, an Acting Secretary of the Air Force, and now an Acting Secretary of the Army. there are also a myriad of priority Deputy positions that have been vacated in the last few weeks.
     
  16. John Fedup

    John Fedup Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    4,207
    Likes Received:
    329
    Location:
    Vancouver and Toronto
    Is there a limit on how long someone can be an “acting secretary”? I vaguely recall 200+ days but not really sure. Not a good a scenario having one of the largest bureaucracies on the planet missing so many key positions with confirmed people in place.
     
  17. Todjaeger

    Todjaeger Potstirrer

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    4,834
    Likes Received:
    499
    Location:
    not in New England anymore...
    It depends on which US department is involved, as there are a few different laws which could be applicable. From a legal perspective, the US under the current administration has started to really drift off towards uncharted waters, legally speaking.
     
  18. John Fedup

    John Fedup Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    4,207
    Likes Received:
    329
    Location:
    Vancouver and Toronto