The Royal Navy Discussions and Updates

John Fedup

The Bunker Group
Then we got into a land war in a land locked country with no funding allotted and voila..
Can relate to the above. The billions we spent in Afghanistan could certainly have been beneficial for capital acquisitions. The deteriorating situation there after all the blood and treasure makes it even more depressing.
 

swerve

Super Moderator
Compressed video of her leaving the basin.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/video/2017/jun/26/hms-queen-elizabeth-prepares-to-leave-port-video-report
Video of passing under the Forth bridge just before midnight, at low tide.
HMS Queen Elizabeth: Tight squeeze as warship passes under Forth Bridge | London Evening Standard

There's been a lot of money wasted by government decisions, e.g. when Gordon Brown put the price up by slowing down building to save money in the short term, at the cost of more costs later, & when Liam Fox decided to switch to cat & trap without looking into it, & switched back when the cost had been worked out.
 

John Fedup

The Bunker Group
I guess the public was not allowed on the bridge during the transit. Would have been an awesome sight as QE passed underneath.;)
 

swerve

Super Moderator
There were supposedly a lot of people watching from the shore, but yeah, the bridge looks empty, & it'd make sense for it to be closed. She looked very close to it.

Disappointing for many people, no doubt. I'd have loved to watch her from the bridge, but I'm at the other end of the country.
 

Systems Adict

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
There were supposedly a lot of people watching from the shore, but yeah, the bridge looks empty, & it'd make sense for it to be closed. She looked very close to it.

Disappointing for many people, no doubt. I'd have loved to watch her from the bridge, but I'm at the other end of the country.

In fairness, it was around midnight before she made it under the bridges, so it being a school night, lots of people didn't want to stand around in the rain, in the pitch black...
;)
 
Odd question here but when I read news about the new HMS Queen Elizabeth carrier I often see them state the size of the deck is equivalent to 3 football pitches so in theory could the UK build a temporary stadium on it and include it as a venue for a World Cup bid?
It would certainly make a striking venue and they can park it up at a part of the country that wouldn't normally have a stadium anywhere near them.
 

John Fedup

The Bunker Group
Not sure about pitch sizes relative to the the QE deck size but I am pretty sure there would be no room for stands to accommodate a significant number of fans. The RN might not be keen in any event.:D
 

t68

Well-Known Member
Odd question here but when I read news about the new HMS Queen Elizabeth carrier I often see them state the size of the deck is equivalent to 3 football pitches so in theory could the UK build a temporary stadium on it and include it as a venue for a World Cup bid?
It would certainly make a striking venue and they can park it up at a part of the country that wouldn't normally have a stadium anywhere near them.
Surface might be a tad hard :dance
 

Systems Adict

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
THIS was posted on Facebook, by Navy News, earlier this morning...

"THE first of the Navy’s next-generation frigates will be laid down before the month is out after a £3.7bn order was placed for three Type 26s.
Whitehall today signed a contract with BAE to deliver the first batch of ‘global combat ships’ – the first three of eight vessels which will replace the equivalent number of specialist submarine-hunting Type 23 frigates.
Yards at Govan and Scotstoun on the Clyde will be responsible for building and fitting out the trio, with the first of the as-yet-unnamed class entering service in the mid-2020s.
What we will get for our £3.7bn are three warships 60ft longer, 2,000 tonnes heavier than their predecessors, equipped with bow and towed array sonar, Sea Ceptor air defence missiles, a 5in main gun as the RN’s trusty 4.5in is retired after decades of faithful service, a ‘mission bay’ for ‘plug in’ containers containing equipment for specific tasks, such as disaster relief, and a flight deck big enough to take a Chinook (though Merlin and Wildcat will be more common).
In due course, firepower will be bolstered by the ‘future offensive surface weapon’ – the missile currently being developed to replace the obsolescent Harpoon.
Typically just 157 men and women – 30-40 fewer than a Type 23 – will run these ships, but there will be space aboard for up to 208 souls.
The 26s are expected to serve for at least 25 years, take the RN to the cusp of the 2060s.
In addition, five general duty frigates – Type 31s – which will replace the five non-submarine-hunting 23s remain earmarked under the 2015 Defence Review.
“This is the start of a programme of anti-submarine ships which will form the mainstay of the Royal Navy’s frigate fore for decades to come,” said Rear Admiral Chris Gardner, Assistant Chief of Naval Staff (Ships).
Work on Ship 2 is due to start in two years’ time with No.3 laid down in 2021. Their names – and their base ports – have yet to be decided.
The hulls will be built at Govan, then moved downstream to Scotstoun for fitting out and testing.
Of the 13 Type 23 frigates currently in service, the oldest, HMS Argyll, is due to pay off in 2023; the youngest, St Albans, will conduct patrols at home and aboard until 2035.
That is when construction of their successors will be completed; the Type 26 is intended to keep the Clyde yards busy until the mid-2030s with the order for the second batch of five ships placed next decade.
The work will support and sustain 3,400 jobs – half in the shipyards, half in the supply chain providing parts and equipment such as radar built on the Isle of Wight and the submarine-hunting towed array sonar from Manchester.
"


THIS appeared at the same time...
Type 26: The MoD has just made a big announcement about the new Navy frigates | Plymouth Herald


As most Sunday newspapers go to print around 10 pm on a Saturday night in the UK, It may only be on their online content, so should hopefully be a news item tomorrow....

Looks like I may have a job from now till I retire !

:D

SA
 

t68

Well-Known Member
THIS was posted on Facebook, by Navy News, earlier this morning...

"THE first of the Navy’s next-generation frigates will be laid down before the month is out after a £3.7bn order was placed for three Type 26s.
Whitehall today signed a contract with BAE to deliver the first batch of ‘global combat ships’ – the first three of eight vessels which will replace the equivalent number of specialist submarine-hunting Type 23 frigates.
Yards at Govan and Scotstoun on the Clyde will be responsible for building and fitting out the trio, with the first of the as-yet-unnamed class entering service in the mid-2020s.
What we will get for our £3.7bn are three warships 60ft longer, 2,000 tonnes heavier than their predecessors, equipped with bow and towed array sonar, Sea Ceptor air defence missiles, a 5in main gun as the RN’s trusty 4.5in is retired after decades of faithful service, a ‘mission bay’ for ‘plug in’ containers containing equipment for specific tasks, such as disaster relief, and a flight deck big enough to take a Chinook (though Merlin and Wildcat will be more common).
In due course, firepower will be bolstered by the ‘future offensive surface weapon’ – the missile currently being developed to replace the obsolescent Harpoon.
Typically just 157 men and women – 30-40 fewer than a Type 23 – will run these ships, but there will be space aboard for up to 208 souls.
The 26s are expected to serve for at least 25 years, take the RN to the cusp of the 2060s.
In addition, five general duty frigates – Type 31s – which will replace the five non-submarine-hunting 23s remain earmarked under the 2015 Defence Review.
“This is the start of a programme of anti-submarine ships which will form the mainstay of the Royal Navy’s frigate fore for decades to come,” said Rear Admiral Chris Gardner, Assistant Chief of Naval Staff (Ships).
Work on Ship 2 is due to start in two years’ time with No.3 laid down in 2021. Their names – and their base ports – have yet to be decided.
The hulls will be built at Govan, then moved downstream to Scotstoun for fitting out and testing.
Of the 13 Type 23 frigates currently in service, the oldest, HMS Argyll, is due to pay off in 2023; the youngest, St Albans, will conduct patrols at home and aboard until 2035.
That is when construction of their successors will be completed; the Type 26 is intended to keep the Clyde yards busy until the mid-2030s with the order for the second batch of five ships placed next decade.
The work will support and sustain 3,400 jobs – half in the shipyards, half in the supply chain providing parts and equipment such as radar built on the Isle of Wight and the submarine-hunting towed array sonar from Manchester.
"


THIS appeared at the same time...
Type 26: The MoD has just made a big announcement about the new Navy frigates | Plymouth Herald


As most Sunday newspapers go to print around 10 pm on a Saturday night in the UK, It may only be on their online content, so should hopefully be a news item tomorrow....

Looks like I may have a job from now till I retire !

:D

SA

I wonder if that now increases the chances for Sea 5000 project
 

StobieWan

Super Moderator
Staff member
THIS was posted on Facebook, by Navy News, earlier this morning...

"THE first of the Navy’s next-generation frigates will be laid down before the month is out after a £3.7bn order was placed for three Type 26s.
Whitehall today signed a contract with BAE to deliver the first batch of ‘global combat ships’ – the first three of eight vessels which will replace the equivalent number of specialist submarine-hunting Type 23 frigates.
Yards at Govan and Scotstoun on the Clyde will be responsible for building and fitting out the trio, with the first of the as-yet-unnamed class entering service in the mid-2020s.
What we will get for our £3.7bn are three warships 60ft longer, 2,000 tonnes heavier than their predecessors, equipped with bow and towed array sonar, Sea Ceptor air defence missiles, a 5in main gun as the RN’s trusty 4.5in is retired after decades of faithful service, a ‘mission bay’ for ‘plug in’ containers containing equipment for specific tasks, such as disaster relief, and a flight deck big enough to take a Chinook (though Merlin and Wildcat will be more common).
In due course, firepower will be bolstered by the ‘future offensive surface weapon’ – the missile currently being developed to replace the obsolescent Harpoon.
Typically just 157 men and women – 30-40 fewer than a Type 23 – will run these ships, but there will be space aboard for up to 208 souls.
The 26s are expected to serve for at least 25 years, take the RN to the cusp of the 2060s.
In addition, five general duty frigates – Type 31s – which will replace the five non-submarine-hunting 23s remain earmarked under the 2015 Defence Review.
“This is the start of a programme of anti-submarine ships which will form the mainstay of the Royal Navy’s frigate fore for decades to come,” said Rear Admiral Chris Gardner, Assistant Chief of Naval Staff (Ships).
Work on Ship 2 is due to start in two years’ time with No.3 laid down in 2021. Their names – and their base ports – have yet to be decided.
The hulls will be built at Govan, then moved downstream to Scotstoun for fitting out and testing.
Of the 13 Type 23 frigates currently in service, the oldest, HMS Argyll, is due to pay off in 2023; the youngest, St Albans, will conduct patrols at home and aboard until 2035.
That is when construction of their successors will be completed; the Type 26 is intended to keep the Clyde yards busy until the mid-2030s with the order for the second batch of five ships placed next decade.
The work will support and sustain 3,400 jobs – half in the shipyards, half in the supply chain providing parts and equipment such as radar built on the Isle of Wight and the submarine-hunting towed array sonar from Manchester.
"


THIS appeared at the same time...
Type 26: The MoD has just made a big announcement about the new Navy frigates | Plymouth Herald


As most Sunday newspapers go to print around 10 pm on a Saturday night in the UK, It may only be on their online content, so should hopefully be a news item tomorrow....

Looks like I may have a job from now till I retire !

:D

SA

Hoorah!

Social media has already exploded with idiots. Funniest one I tripped over was one bloke asking why Ireland could replace all their Fishery Protection vessels for less than the cost of one frigate. Well..duh..

Any word on if Type 31 will run concurrently or in parallel build with the 26?
 

John Fedup

The Bunker Group
I wonder if that now increases the chances for Sea 5000 project
Can't hurt and the same can be said for our CSC project. The UK start for Type 26 is an important factor for the CSC decision which was supposed to be June, now August and recent complaints by one major vendor may push the date further out. The complaints involved Canadian modifications which almost amount to a new design. (I think most mods are addressed by the Type 26 which is why other vendors aren't happy, the tender called for proven designs originally). The other issue is IP rights demanded by the Canadian government. This is a more significant problem.
 

Systems Adict

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
Hoorah!

Social media has already exploded with idiots. Funniest one I tripped over was one bloke asking why Ireland could replace all their Fishery Protection vessels for less than the cost of one frigate. Well..duh..

Any word on if Type 31 will run concurrently or in parallel build with the 26?
Had a look thru both BAE & the RN's press releases on their websites, there is NOTHING resembling comments about Type 31.

Manufacturing contract for Type 26 Global Combat Ship awarded to BAE Systems | BAE Systems | International

Deal signed for first three new Type 26 frigates

Even the Gov't haven't included it in theirs...

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/multi-billion-pound-defence-deal-secures-thousands-of-uk-jobs

With x3 ships on the cards, with a possible x5 to follow in the early 2020's (something for the NEXT Govt to worry about !), Type 31 may turn into a pipe dream, as situations change as time goes on.

Who knows, they may find a few £Billion lying around to build MORE T26's...?

:D

SA
 

StingrayOZ

Super Moderator
Staff member
Who knows, they may find a few £Billion lying around to build MORE T26's...?

:D

SA
I got to say, having a whole new hull design to save some coin seems suspect, if all goes well, you might be able to save some in the short term, but long term I think the value is dubious. Unless you can get the size down to require smaller engines, smaller mech services, etc its only going to be tiny savings. Then you introduce new logistical headaches.

I would hope they end up ordering all type 26. Even if some have light fit outs. If there is something I think we can learn from the Americans, pick a hull, build the hell out of it while chasing costs, increasing quality.
 

ASSAIL

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
I wonder if that now increases the chances for Sea 5000 project
I'm still cautious about the T26 for the RAN. All is not rosey and BAE seem to have undue influence over both the design and build cycle and cost gauging is apparent. If those costs are carried over to a build in Australia we may see budget pressure reducing numbers despite every assurance to the contrary

The attached article illustrates my concerns above and given that ant Australian build will include quite extensive mods to weapons and sensors I feel a great unease.

https://ukarmedforcescommentary.blogspot.com.au/2017/07/type-26-where-does-money-go.html

IMHO the safest and cheapest option for the RAN would be Navantias offering.
 

alexsa

Super Moderator
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
THIS was posted on Facebook, by Navy News, earlier this morning...

"

Looks like I may have a job from now till I retire !

:D

SA

I hope that is because you are close to retirement (within the next 15 years) rather than this could be along and drawn out process. Mind you if the T26 gets up as the Future Frigate in Australia then it will keep you busy.
 

Systems Adict

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
I'm still cautious about the T26 for the RAN. All is not rosey and BAE seem to have undue influence over both the design and build cycle and cost gauging is apparent. If those costs are carried over to a build in Australia we may see budget pressure reducing numbers despite every assurance to the contrary

The attached article illustrates my concerns above and given that any Australian build will include quite extensive mods to weapons and sensors I feel a great unease.

https://ukarmedforcescommentary.blogspot.com.au/2017/07/type-26-where-does-money-go.html

IMHO the safest and cheapest option for the RAN would be Navantias offering.

I am of course, very biased wrt T26 (whether it be for UK, CAN or AUS). ;)


I also believe that the export vessels will be tailored to match the demands placed on the design by the relevant home nation, giving that govt what they have asked for and what they consider 'value for money'.

AFAIK, the Canadian & Australian customers will be happy to accept the 5 Inch gun (as it ties in with their current arrangements, which will REDUCE the overall cost of thru life support & operation). I can't comment on other distinct aspects of the designs (such as combat systems / radars / engines / etc), as there is very little in the public domain (& not working on these projects means I don't know anyway !)

Might be worth looking here...? :dunce

Canadian Surface Combatant | Investing in Equipment | National Defence | Canadian Forces

https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/bae-systems-australia-chief-hopeful-australia-will-opt-type-26-frigate/


This is however getting away from the reasoning in this thread (i.e. discussions regarding the RN), so I'll get back on tack.



For me personally, I have 21 years until I retire, having spent 24 years in the maritime industry in the UK, so being involved in T26 Batch 1, the hopeful continuation onto Batch 2 & the eventual road to Type 31, or the continuation of the Type 26 hull, will take me thru till 2038 !



As for Gabriele's Blog & the comments it contains. Those are his opinions, many other people have different opinions & I have my opinion. We are all entitled to our opinions & I shall simply leave it at that...

:D

SA
 

John Fedup

The Bunker Group
Can't see any nation deviating from the MTU diesels and MT-30 GT arrangement but combat management systems, radars, and missile selection will likely be different.
 
Top