Welcome to DefenceTalk.com Forum!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

South Korean Navy

Discussion in 'Navy & Maritime' started by fylr71, Jul 1, 2006.

Share This Page

  1. Schumacher

    Schumacher New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    0
    ok. Made by themselves with a combination of pressure & pacificism. Why more support for it now ? Well, the rise of China & the US's willingness to let them to get them to help out with China.
     
  2. eckherl

    eckherl Defense Professional Verified Defense Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,249
    Likes Received:
    0
    If all you are going to do is throw in your smart ass comments Schumacher then do not respond to my posts and I will give you the same courtesy.
     
  3. Transient

    Transient New Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2006
    Messages:
    213
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why do you still bother with him? He has admitted outright that he based his perceptions of article 9 on a personal assumption. An assumption he has refused to change even after confronted with directly contradicting evidence. Instead of admitting his mistake, he churns up further arguments to support his theory without anything to back himself up whatsoever.
     
  4. Schumacher

    Schumacher New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, u seem genuinely perplexed why Asians worry more abt Japan than China & has the audacity to say they're not smart to do so as if u know more abt their well-being than themselves.
    Many will argue the other way around ie dispute that more worry abt Japan than China, in which case it'll be a long argument with no easy conclusion.
     
  5. Schumacher

    Schumacher New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    0
    U ask him ? Don't u know the answer ? :)
     
  6. daewon

    daewon New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    0
    You got me here :)
    No China is not a better option. In fact it would be the greater of the two
    evils. However Japan climbing back to the top is just as scary. Japan with CVBGs SSNs controlling Asian water? God, the horror. Frankly I'd like to see Korea do that but I know it's a totally biased and highly unlikely idea.
    As someone mentioned earlier if Japan and PRC were given a free reign in
    an arms race it could be the revival of German UK naval rivalry back in early 20th century. Chinese military build up is now unstoppable even Japan won't be able to match it unless it gets itself nuclear weapons. To keep things stable in the Far East sbd outside the zone has to intervene. US is the only one qualified in that role.
    So it would have no point for Japan to get itself a new constituyion just to match the growing Chinese. If it aimed to do that it would feel compelled to get nukes and that's not a road anybody wants to take.
     
  7. eckherl

    eckherl Defense Professional Verified Defense Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,249
    Likes Received:
    0
    I know wounds from the past are hard at healing, but does South Korea really trust China, I asked my Korean oma the question of who does Korea trust, and her answer to me was no one, she is 82 years of age, I asked my wife the same question and she stated that she felt China was the bigger threat and she could see Korea and Japan working together in the future to counter this possible future threat. Prime minister Abe needs to get his foot out of his mouth and admit to some of the war atrocities Japan has caused, maybe this would ease up on the trust issue and Korea and Japan could start working closely together. Again - maybe wishful thinking on my part.
     
  8. eckherl

    eckherl Defense Professional Verified Defense Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,249
    Likes Received:
    0
    No I am not perplexed on how other Asian nations view Japan and I am not saying that they are stupid either, it was a just figure of speech.
    All I was trying to say is that I would like to see some of these countries come together and start working together to take some of the punch out China that will be there in future times.

    And you are right we could argue forever on the trust issue.
     
  9. Musashi_kenshin

    Musashi_kenshin Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2005
    Messages:
    689
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Great Britain
    Because the Constitution as it stands seems to forbid that capable navy (and I wouldn't say its airpower is "huge") from existing at all. Japan wants to have the Constitution recognise its armed forces as being legitimate.

    Why is that not acceptable?
     
  10. Schumacher

    Schumacher New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    0
    Daewon, I think the reason for the views of some with regard to China-Asia-Japan by some are quite simple, getting them to admit it is another matter.
    Japan, has been a G7 & a good ally of the west for a long time, but that didn't stop it from being accused as a threat from the 70s up to first half of 90s.
    What change now ? One word, China. US is the top dog & China is the one with the most potential to overtake it.
    So Japan now becomes the lesser evil & is now described as 'peaceful' just so to get it, & other nations, on board against China. Simple divide & conquer, that's all.
     
  11. Schumacher

    Schumacher New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    0
    See my post to Daewon. It's natural that US wants to keep its top dog status & hope others will work with it to keep China at bay. No right or wrong here.
    I can see the SK-Japan rivalry from history is not helpful to this since both are US allies.
    But at least be open abt this instead of making up that Asians have no good reasons to worry abt Japan.
     
  12. daewon

    daewon New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    0
    OK guys let's not get carried away here.

    The claim that Japan is a completely pacifist nation is backed by
    the fact that Japan has maintained its Pacifist Constitution for the
    last 5 decades and that it has during that time shown no sign of
    aggression towards the world.
    That is solid logic and very convincing.
    At least nominally Japan has maintained a very pacifist attitude,
    which is in itself a laudable achievement.

    When you look into how Japan has behaved it is more worrisome.
    Continued denial of their war criminal past and the public's
    ignorance of it gives reason to doubt their sincerety. At least that
    is how it is perceived by its neighbors. If they were wrong and
    Japan is sincere in its intention to being a peaceful nation why not
    keep its current constitution? Even with it they have sufficient
    "self defence" force to withstand all but a nuclear strike.

    I do agree China as a dominant power in the Far East is alarming.
    If I had to choose China would always be a greater of the two evils,
    so to speak. I also agree that closer cooperation btwn Japan and Korea
    is preferable. That is actually being promoted though.

    I just wanted to point out that Japan while sometimes over villified
    it is in other instances overly trusted.

    I hope that the naval arms race that lead to heightened tensions and
    eventually to war back in early 20th century does not repeat itself here.
    US can act as a stabilizer here unlike back then and Japan and ROK together
    could work to check the growing China.
     
  13. Musashi_kenshin

    Musashi_kenshin Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2005
    Messages:
    689
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Great Britain
    Erm, it was regarded by the US as an economic threat. It was not believed to be a military threat at all (and it isn't today) - plus the Japanese recession in the 1990s took care of the fear of Japan "buying up" the US.
     
  14. Grand Danois

    Grand Danois Entertainer

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2006
    Messages:
    3,297
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    CPH
    Japan, South Korea and the other East Asian countries will be far more independent with cooperation and the US to offset Chinese power.

    China wants the US out, as it cannot assert itself over these countries as long as the US is around.

    Divide and rule btw. Please spell out the words "u", "r" and "abt" is a horror to read.
     
  15. Schumacher

    Schumacher New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why attack if u can buy up the whole country ? :) Anyway, yes, the recession did take some air out of that. And the point is there's no such talks now.
    Like I said, it's hard for some to admit to their true motivations.
     
  16. Schumacher

    Schumacher New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    0
    ok, mod, no more u, r, abt. :)
    Yes, many do want US to stay to help keep China balance & vice-versa for self-interest. But do they want US to openly challenge China just for the sake of keeping its top dog status ? and force them to choose in the process ?
     
  17. eckherl

    eckherl Defense Professional Verified Defense Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,249
    Likes Received:
    0
    @daewon

    You talked earlier in the thread about what South Korea is doing at the present moment at securing her interests in that regoin. Do you know what their vision is in the future for their naval power after they have achieved that goal.
     
  18. Grand Danois

    Grand Danois Entertainer

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2006
    Messages:
    3,297
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    CPH
    Oh thank you. ;)

    Well, ultimately it is their choice.

    Can't see the US challenging anybody over "top dog" status. China is so distant from that position that they are in "peace and tranquility" mode towards China.

    Certainly no Cold War conditions exist or will exist in the medium term.
     
  19. Transient

    Transient New Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2006
    Messages:
    213
    Likes Received:
    0
    Despite your distrust of Japan, your abilty to maintain objectivity is impressive. You have said that the Japanese population is pacifist, and I fully agree. Another thing I would add is that Japan is a fully functioning democracy, and just as there are some hardliners there are also liberals. While it is regrettable that there are people like Abe who sprout denials of Imperial Japan's atrocities, as well as Japan's whitewashing of its past in some sectors, as long as the population remains pacifist and democracy is maintained there should be no need to fear a Japan repeating its mistakes. In fact, despite having a strong navy, it's armed forces isn't even capable of carrying out what it did in WW2. It simply isn't built to undertake invasions anymore.
     
  20. Stimpy75

    Stimpy75 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2006
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Germany NRW