Looks like some kind of Dutch experience may be next:I wonder if France have learned from their Australian experience. There are probably two major reasons that Australia cancelled the Attack class. One is that they prefered nuclear but the cost blowouts and delays didn't help the French cause.
Thank you for sharing.Looks like some kind of Dutch experience may be next:
"It is not possible for the Netherlands to independently investigate the quotation from the French shipyard Naval Group. This was a requirement from Defense, but according to French law no foreign audit agency is allowed to investigate French tenders. Defense adjusted the requirement during the tender, without informing the House of Representatives or the other yards. In theory, Naval Group can therefore do whatever they want with the price, without Dutch control. This is evident from research by Marineschips.nl in collaboration with de Volkskrant ." [Google translation]
Marineschepen.nl: Defense adjusted requirements to keep the French shipyard on board
It's now official, the contract has been signed.
I know this is not the same as the Attack class, but find it interesting to see a conventional screw propeller instead of the pump jet.Just released, a video of an interview about the current status of the Orkaklasse program, a new class of conventional diesel-electric submarines based on the nuclear powered Suffren Class of the Marine Nationale, to replace the Walrusklasse submarines.
The new submarines will be named Orka, Zwaardvis, Barracuda and Tijgerhaai, and the first two are planned to be delivered before 2035, in that year all Walrusklasse submarines will be older than 40 years.