Republic of Singapore Air Force Discussions

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
Aside to that, unsure what’s the plan for Fokker 50 MPA/C-130 Transport since CAF mentioned that RSAF will continue to operate these type of aircraft for many years to come.
1. I am paying close attention to the A400M program’s development and maturity — as this is a candidate to replace Singapore’s 10 modernised C-130H/Bs (with the obvious alternative being the C-130Js, which is a like-for-like replacement).
  • 6 to 8 A400Ms can renew and enhance the RSAF’s transport capability while reducing RSAF manpower needs, once the technical issues are sorted by the manufacturer (see: the DT thread on the A400m and The Airbus A400M Atlas – Part 2 (What is So Good about It Anyway) - Think Defence). The H225M fits well into the A400M cargo-hold and the RSAF can fly in most of it’s own helicopters for overseas exercises, instead of solely using a civilian contractor.
  • If the Europrop TP400 engine and propeller gearbox problems continue, Airbus will not get new A400M users like the Korea or Singapore. Korean acceptance of the proposed Spain deal with breathe life for A400M export. However, I continue to scratch my head over the inability of Europrop International GmbH (a JV of four main European aircraft engine manufacturers), to get its act together.
  • Despite these known problems, I am still a big fan of the A400m due to its unique features — including its ability to carry 37 tons of odd sized cargo, a feature that is very useful in HADR missions, and its future capability as a tanker (final certification in 2021) and to conduct the simultaneous deployment of up to 116 paratroopers by using both side doors (pending future certification). This means the SAF commandos can dispatch about one company of airborne troops in 1 aircraft.
  • The A400M is being produced at the reduced rate of eight per annum (down from a high of 19 achieved in 2017), it should take a further 11 years for it to complete the remaining aircraft orders, extending work into the early 2030s, which means there is no hurry to place an order until they meet SAF’s requirements, including meeting factors like operating costs and op tempo.
We will just have to wait for future Singapore AirShows in 2022 (or 2024) for more news at that time, for a clearer picture to emerge.

2. ST Aerospace has redelivered RSAF’s and Oman’s C-130H fleets as part of the modernization these air forces. Turnround time of each the thee Royal Air Force of Oman (RAFO) C-130Hs is seven months, including a full depot overhaul — with center wing box replacement, where required.
  • As an approved Lockheed Martin Hercules servicing centre coupled with an in-house engineering and development centre, ST Aerospace is a one-stop centre for the C-130 Hercules aircraft. Service offerings range from airframe, engine and component MRO, to landing gear and parts support, as well as customised upgrades and modernisation. To date, ST Aerospace has redelivered more than 570 C-130 aircraft, providing nose to tail solutions to C-130 operators. “We have more than 400 in-house design and analysis engineers for this sort of project,” Loh Piang Khuen, director military business unit for ST Aerospace said.
  • The core of the modernization on both the RSAF and RAFO C-130s is the Rockwell Collins Flight2 integrated avionics suite. This multi-option digital system has also been sold in this region to Thailand, where 12 C-130Hs were modernized. The other partners with ST Aero on the RAFO aircraft are ADP, EuroAvionics, GE, L-3 and Test and Training Flight Services. There are six multifunction displays, and the cockpit lighting has been modified to permit pilots to wear night vision goggles.
  • ST Aerospace continues to hope to win fresh customers for its Lockheed Martin C-130 cockpit upgrades from operators in the Asia-Pacific and beyond.
What’s your take? Will be another 10-15 years? Will these aircraft rendered obsolescence? Will the airframe be able to operate the harsh external environment?
3. I believe the Fokker 50 MPA are going to be quietly modernised (with upgraded radar and other systems like ELTA's ELM-2022ES). In the next 5 years, some of their taskings will be taken over by a maritime UAV. The RSAF has inadvertently revealed the existence of an enhanced version of its Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) Heron UAV during the 'Forging Sabre 2019’ exercise, equipped with a belly mounted bulged pod - housing an undisclosed external sensor payload - being towed at the US airbase. The Heron Mark II and the MQ-9B Sky Guardian UAVs are certainly contenders for this role.
  • In Mar 2019, the US State Department has given the green light for Belgium to buy MQ-9B Sky Guardians, in a US$600 million deal that could include four MQ-9Bs, two ground stations, five AN/DAS-4 multispectral targeting systems, 15 embedded GPS/inertial navigation systems, five AN/APY-8 Lynx synthetic aperture radars, and five detect-and-avoid systems.
  • In Nov 2019, the Australian Department of Defence has down-selected the MQ-9B Sky Guardian for the programme to acquire an armed Medium Altitude Long Endurance (MALE) remotely piloted aircraft system under Project Air 7003 — A$1.3 billion (US$884m) programme.
What about safety of her Pilots and Crew? What about the technological / armament aspects when compared to other MPAs in the region?
4. This is a non- issue as commercial airlines are used more heavily than any RSAF aircraft and as long as these aircraft are well maintained, safety is not a major concern. Singapore has Harpoon armed MPAs with a capable search radar, so what other countries do to improve their MPA fleet, it is of little concern to us — there is no need to match them — if the LRSM is selected by the RSAF, integration testing of this capability with the Fokker 50 and F-15SG would be a plus. But it is more important that Singapore’s selected platform or weapons fit our way of war, rather than a this-vs-that comparison of platforms (without consideration of SAF requirements). Further, the RSAF has been sharing our MPA tactics with Indonesia during joint exercises with them.
What about procuring more S-70B Sea Hawks? There is lacking of affirmation from the RSAF.
5. We have 8 Seahawks, to be used by 6 frigates — what further affirmation do you need? The MRCV is to be operational in the 2025 to 2027 time frame and the aviation centric JMMS even later. In 2025 to 2027, we may need a place an order for few more maritime helicopters but not at this moment.
 
Last edited:

ngatimozart

Super Moderator
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
Just as a hypothetical question if / when the A400M program goes belly up, would the SAF look at a two tier air mobility capabilty, say C-130J for tactical airlift and say a small number of KHI C-2 for strategic air lift?
 

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
Just as a hypothetical question if / when the A400M program goes belly up, would the SAF look at a two tier air mobility capabilty, say C-130J for tactical airlift and say a small number of KHI C-2 for strategic air lift?
Given the cost of upgrading the F-16 fleet (the 1st of which will be rolled out around 2021) and introduction of the F-35B fleet in 2026, I suspect that the RSAF would not want to incur the cost of having 2 different types of transport aircraft (unless there is a specific operational need). It is very unlikely that Singapore will buy anything Japanese, due to their different concept of operations — partly because the Japanese are just not really invested or interested in building a relationship with Singapore on a military-to-military or a military technology level — partly because a fleet of ten C-130J is good enough to meet our key operational needs — except that an all C-130J fleet can’t conduct airlift of odd sized cargoes for HADR and other missions. The KHI C-2 is exotic in price due to its limited production run (estimated at 40+) and has some nice features, including speed and range that we don’t need. IMHO, we will only consider the KHI C-2 if this single aircraft type can replace almost all current missions that the RSAF C-130H fleet performs at the same op tempo.

I am guessing that the RSAF does not want a situation where we can’t take some attrition — a mixed transport fleet is less resilient (to attacks on our airbases) and performs poorer, from an operational tempo point of view (if there is some battle damage), unless we are willing to over invest in spare engines and other parts for both aircraft types. As an example of this mindset, our fleet of 60 F-16s has 7 spare engines to cater for bird strikes, FOD and battle damage. Singapore is a hoarder of spare parts —to support a high op tempo of each aircraft type, if the need arises.
 
Last edited:

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
Elbit’s Condor 2 LROP System replaces TigerEye in Singapore
1. While it is unclear if Singapore is the customer described to be from the Asia-Pacific region in a “follow-on contract award” for the Condor 2 worth US$82 million and announced by Elbit in March 2017, Defense News has seen several images of F-16Ds of the Republic of Singapore Air Force carrying the Elbit Condor 2 Long Range Oblique Photography (LROP) system on their centerline station.

2. Company documentation from 2016 listed four users of the pod, which include Israel, India and now Singapore.

3. The Condor 2 is an electro-optical/infrared system that Elbit says provides simultaneous, high-resolution visible and infrared reconnaissance images at a long standoff distance from the target, covering wide areas in a short time span.
The Israeli company says this reduces the risk to the parent aircraft by enabling photography to be carried out at higher altitudes (which is listed in company documentation as 50,000 feet) and longer distances of up to 50 miles at speeds of up to Mach 1.4. Elbit also says the system can transmit images in real time via an onboard data link to a ground-based image exploitation station.

4. LOROP is used as a means of collecting quantitative data about very distant scenes. Two measuring aspects are as follows:

first, producing dimensional data about the sizes and heights of man-made objects; and​
secondly, measuring the geographic location of an object.​
5. In Jun 2019 Elbit Systems launched CONDOR MS, a new LOROP system that introduces Multi-Spectral (MS) sensing capability and Artificial Intelligence (AI) analytics to stand-off strategic intelligence gathering missions. CONDOR MS integrates three high resolution Electro Optic (EO) sensors into the Company’s certified and widely operational CONDOR2 system: Visible & Near Infra-Red (VNIR), Medium-Wave Infrared (MWIR), and Short-Wave Infrared (SWIR). The unique combination of multi-spectral sensing, high level of stabilization and auto image enhancement enables the new system to dramatically extend coverage area in day, night and adverse weather conditions thereby improving the strategic reconnaissance output while increasing the survivability of the platforms. Deep learning algorithms and precise geo-location enable the CONDOR MS to identify a large number of targets at extremely high rates, hence significantly shortening the time frame needed to close sensor-to-shooter loops.

6. This pod feeds wide swaths of geo-located stereo-scopic image data for G2 Army’s Imagery Analysis Centre (IAC), in peacetime and at war. The pod gathers too much info for aircrew to process in-flight — in old days, called air-photos; and today called imagery analysis. Numerous teams of Singaporean Imagery Analysts from IAC have be deployed by rotation to the Combined Joint Task Force Headquarters in Kuwait to do the same imagery analysis work for the coalition.
 
Last edited:

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
Post 1 of 2: Peacetime Operations

1. The RSAF is on 24/7 standby, ready to:
(a) respond swiftly to life-saving missions with its Rescue 10. This helicopter is often scrambled to evacuate patients from civilian vessels in the vicinity of Singapore, who need immediate medical attention. Rescue 10 followed SOPs smoothly despite having to don masks and PPE, and brought the patient to a hospital in Singapore; and​
(b) conduct patrols to protect our SLOCs with its Fokker 50 MPA.​
2. I hope to see the new H225Ms being delivered in Rescue 10 livery by 2021.
 
Last edited:

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
Post 2 of 2: Updates on acquisitions
3. Dr Ng Eng Hen, Minister of Defence has recently said:

“Let me talk about acquisitions. F-35 JSF acquisition remains on track, and we expect to take delivery of four F-35Bs around 2026, so we are on schedule...​
Air Defence, our Aster-30 system will be stood up for 24/7 operations, on schedule to replace to replace our I-HAWK systems. Now there are some delays, in particular two – the deliveries of our CH-47Fs and our H225M helicopters, and we previously said that we expected them end-2020. There will be delays and we are expecting them now in 2021.”​
 
Last edited:

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
By 2026, Singapore will make a start on operating 4 F-35Bs (with an option for 8 more). The RSAF as plans to slowly phase out, what I speculate to be between 24 to 36 of our F-16s by the late 2030s (to be replaced by some F-35Bs, many of which will be based in the US).
Singapore’s 12 F-16s at Luke Airbase will be moving to another location by 2026. Fort Smith Airport, Hulman Field, Buckley Air Force Base, Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland, and Selfridge Air National Guard Base are the final candidates for the collocation for the RSAF’s F-16s (from Luke) and 4 new Block 4 F-35Bs.

Block 4 upgrades are divided into six categories:
  • Integration of 7 new weapons, including the SDB II, ASRAAM and Meteor; and Norway’s Joint Strike Missile;
  • 8 logistics and support changes;
  • 13 electronic warfare updates and 7 interoperability and networking changes;
  • 7 cockpit and navigation upgrades; and
  • 11 radar and electro-optical system enhancements.
 
Last edited:

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
More updates on the planned move of Singaporean F-16s from Luke AFB, which is located at the outskirts of Phoenix, Arizona. This base will reach its aircraft hosting capacity in the coming years. Its resident US Air Force squadrons are set to convert from F-16s to the F-35A, and the base itself will continue to be the training location for F-35 international partner nations.
Singapore’s M-346s flying in France.
More news on Singapore’s A330MRTTs.
 

Boagrius

Well-Known Member
Quick question here prompted by the mention of the Aster-30 capability: I understand that Singapore uses an aerostat based radar as part of its national IADS. Is it known whether this system can be used to directly cue Aster-30 or is it more of a surveillance/early warning capability?
 

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
Quick question here prompted by the mention of the Aster-30 capability: I understand that Singapore uses an aerostat based radar as part of its national IADS.
Singapore has at least 3 redundant radar systems with over lapping capabilities. The RSAF’s air defense radars for early warning includes the G550AEW, the FPS-117 (that is perched on Bukit Gombak at 133 meters or 436 feet) and the radar system on the aerostat.
Is it known whether this system can be used to directly cue Aster-30 or is it more of a surveillance/early warning capability?
The capabilities of this 3rd Israeli made system is unclear and deliberately so — suspected to be the EL/M-2083.

I think it is safe to say that there are redundant systems that can provide weapons quality tracks to cue the Aster 30 (including from naval radars).

There are also other radar systems in operation that provide weapons quality cueing. These includes Giraffe AMB, Thales Groundmaster 200 (with a range of over 250km for detection & a shorter range for cueing) and the Elta EL/M-2084 (with a range of over 470km for air surveillance & a 100km for weapon location), which is really designed as a super C-Ram system.
 
Last edited:

Boagrius

Well-Known Member
Singapore has at least 3 redundant radar systems with over lapping capabilities. The RSAF’s air defense radars for early warning includes the G550AEW, the FPS-117 (that is perched on Bukit Gombak at 133 meters or 436 feet) and the radar system on the aerostat.

The capabilities of this 3rd Israeli made system is unclear and deliberately so — suspected to be the EL/M-2083.

I think it is safe to say that there are redundant systems that can provide weapons quality tracks to cue the Aster 30 (including from naval radars).

There are also other radar systems in operation that provide weapons quality cueing. These includes Giraffe AMB, Thales Groundmaster 200 (with a range of over 250km for detection & a shorter range for cueing) and the Elta EL/M-2084 (with a range of over 470km for air surveillance & a 100km for weapon location), which is really designed as a super C-Ram system.
That is interesting, thanks for the run-down. I find the aerostat capability intriguing, since it seems like an obvious choice for persistent low altitude radar coverage. Nevertheless the U.S, for all its resources, was frustrated in its efforts with JLENS. I find it surprising that this sort of system is not more commonplace.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
That is interesting, thanks for the run-down. I find the aerostat capability intriguing, since it seems like an obvious choice for persistent low altitude radar coverage.
It’s a logical idea that is very hard to implement due to 3 reasons:
(i) The 2 aerostats used by the RSAF in Singapore cannot operate in high winds — in certain weather conditions, they have to be lowered. For example one of the two American JLENS aerostats broke free of its mooring at the Aberdeen Proving Grounds on 28 Oct 2015 due to high winds. On that day, the winds above Aberdeen Proving Grounds reached upwards of 69 miles per hour, near the upper limit of JLENS’s design threshold. The US Army report notes that certain key system malfunctions were to blame. In particular, a fault in the aerostat’s air pressure sensor caused one of the aerostat’s tail fins partially to deflate. This contributed to unstable flight “until the tether tension reached extreme levels and broke away” from its mooring station.​
(ii) Extensive testing was required to IEEE C95.1-2005 standards that the radar does not emit too much radiation. Without extensive safety testing, these systems typically cannot be co-located near population centres. Due to housing density in Singapore, it was a huge effort. Most countries do not have the determination and technical expertise to ensure safe operations.​
(iii) Even after solving the lighting protection problem, the initial operational capability for the aerostats was further delayed (IIRC for 2 years) due to the Aberdeen malfunction — to enable the design of a safety workaround — to ensure that what happened in the US cannot occur in Singapore.​
Nevertheless the U.S, for all its resources, was frustrated in its efforts with JLENS. I find it surprising that this sort of system is not more commonplace.
To the general public, Singapore has two balloons but IMHO, the technical challenges faced by the RSAF and DSTA team to mature this technology and to operate in 24/7, in a city is not for the faint of heart.

The cost overruns alone to overcome setbacks would have brought most projects to their knees but Singapore persisted as the need is great, with 4 issues that had to be resolved by Singapore defence science.

One, when smaller aerostats were used in Afghanistan, they were not able to provide 24/7 coverage due to the need to lower them for maintenance. The Taliban attacked during those window periods. Singapore has two of these systems and by design, the downtime is very low. When the system goes down, a G550AEW will go up to provide gap coverage.

Two, the static location of aerostats means they are easy to jam by the enemy. A plan to mitigate this was executed but it’s details are classified.

Three, these airborne radar systems need a lot of processing power to acquire low-radar signature, cruise missiles, against a background of ground clutter. Even a moderate amount of ambient noise, like rain storms during the monsoon season can affect its performance. It took years to develop all the different types of algorithms to reject ambient noise specific to the 2 Singapore sites to improve reliability. Even more computing power is required to select real targets with low radar return from ground clutter (through the use of bistatic radar detection).

Four, I have some basis to suspect that Singapore’s 2 aerostats are set up as part of a Cooperative Radar Network (CRANK) that is able to provide 24/7 and all round coverage. CRANK has multiple radars that are networked together such that the radars in the network can act as either a transmitter or receiver. For a truly dynamic and effective system, the radars should be able to be moved around and the transmitter-receiver pairs be assigned in real-time in response to the changing threat scenarios. There is a 2003 NPS paper for a sea base, using CRANK as a concept.
 
Last edited:

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
Singapore’s first of 16 new CH-47F, powered by two Lycoming T55 engines, rolls off the Boeing production line and into flight — this new Chinook is equipped with Elbit Systems’ survivability and mission capability upgrades that includes SATCOM.

According to Mike Yeo, the Singaporean Chinook in the photo by Vincent Games has a different equipment fit from standard US Army CH-47Fs. It was fitted with a lengthened nosecone for a navigation radar, enlarged fuel tanks on the side sponsons and is equipped with an electro-optical/infrared turret below its nosecone to better support low visibility operations. These DSTA specified modifications will support the future deployment of the CH-47F from a Singaporean sea base (like the JMMS).

The large side sponsons enable Singapore’s CH-47Fs to be employed for “Fat Cow” operations; to refuel the H225Ms, using the Forward Area Refueling Equipment Kit. The fuel tanks on the inside the sponsons can be removed in approximately 15 minutes per tank.

There is also a satellite communications antenna on the top of the CH-47F fuselage — to facilitate comms with the sea base, when it is deployed on a regional HADR mission. The survivability and mission capability upgrades include rectangular-shaped radar warning receivers, a product of Elbit Systems — who provided the onboard defensive suite.
 
Last edited:

CheeZe

Active Member
By 2026, Singapore will make a start on operating 4 F-35Bs (with an option for 8 more). The RSAF as plans to slowly phase out, what I speculate to be between 24 to 36 of our F-16s by the late 2030s (to be replaced by F-35Bs, many of which will be based in the US).
What if, for some completely unforeseeable reason, the RSAF decided that it didn't like the F-35 platform? Are there any viable alternatives for them to look at to replace the F-16s? I'm not saying I expect them to find anything wrong with the F-35B or to decide not to purchase more of them. I'm just wondering if there really is a choice of platforms.
 

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
What if, for some completely unforeseeable reason, the RSAF decided that it didn't like the F-35 platform?
1. Hmmm...There may be concerns on:

(i) data links, where the F-35 has its own special system to share info between a 4 ship formation — Singapore needs to have them share that info not only with F-15SGs, G550AEWs, Fokker 50 MPAs but also with the navy; and this data must be high quality radar tracks that can be understood by shipboard systems;​

(ii) high reprogramming costs to share data and integrate the F-35B with Singapore’s IADS;​

(iii) the ability integrate the F-35B with the RSAF’s SEAD tool chest — which has many Israeli sourced tools; and​
(iv) the cost of raising, training and sustaining the 1st RSAF F35B squadron. The acquisition cost will be affected by production rate and IIRC, the numbers are:​
— 141 F-35s for Lot 12 (2020), 160 F-35s for Lot 13 (2021) and 169 F-35s for Lot 14 (2022).​
— Lot 15 for 2023 delivery to all F-35 buyers globally is 116 F-35As, 29 F-35Bs, and 24 F-35Cs; a total of 169.​
—Lot 16 for 2024 delivery to all F-35 buyers globally is 101 F-35As, 32 F-35Bs, 24 F-35Cs; a total of 157 aircraft.​
— Lot 17 for 2025 delivery to all F-35 buyers globally is 98 F-35As, 37 F -35Bs, and 24 F-35Cs; a total of 159 aircraft.​
Are there any viable alternatives for them to look at to replace the F-16s?
2. More F-15SGs, at least 1 more squadron (while waiting for market alternatives to mature).
I'm not saying I expect them to find anything wrong with the F-35B or to decide not to purchase more of them.
3. Moving from 4.5 gen to 5th gen is not an easy transition. It’s a cultural thing.
I'm just wondering if there really is a choice of platforms.
4. For STOVL Ops, there is really no alternative. MINDEF’s plan to enhance the capability of the SAF to conduct littoral operations, would be screwed without the F-35B.

5. As Singapore outlines the future of it’s forces in 2030 and beyond in the 2019 “Building the Next Generation Singapore Armed Forces”. This document outlines four major programs:

One, the four 70 m long Invincible-Class (Type 218SG) submarines. In this regard, on 12 May 2020, German online news site, shz.de, has reported that RSS Invincible, the lead boat of the Republic of Singapore Navy's 4 new Type 218SG-class submarines, has commenced diving trials in Kiel, Germany.​
Two, the 130 m long Multi-Role Combat Vessels (MRCV) will replace the six ageing Victory-class Corvettes by 2025​
Three, the Joint Multi-Mission Ships (JMMS), which will be a LHD type vessel with a through-deck to support aviation. I note that ST Engineering Marine has downplayed apparent connections that have been made between the Endurance 170 design, and Singapore's impending JMMS programme (to follow after the MRCV programme).​
Four, operating a fifth generation STOVL fighter aircraft; so that RSAF bases are more resilient to enemy attacks.​
 
Last edited:

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
Various sources have reported that 10 new-build CH-47Fs from an unannounced Singaporean order for 16 helicopters, signed in Nov 2016, will be based at Oakey. The first of the new helicopters are expected to arrive in the first quarter of 2021, with the balance being shipped directly to Singapore from the US.

Five RSAF CH-47D Chinooks have been based at Oakey since 2018 under the Oakey Agreement between the two countries, which allows up to 16 helicopters to be based in Australia at any given time for pilot training.
 

t68

Well-Known Member
Various sources have reported that 10 new-build CH-47Fs from an unannounced Singaporean order for 16 helicopters, signed in Nov 2016, will be based at Oakey. The first of the new helicopters are expected to arrive in the first quarter of 2021, with the balance being shipped directly to Singapore from the US.

Five RSAF CH-47D Chinooks have been based at Oakey since 2018 under the Oakey Agreement between the two countries, which allows up to 16 helicopters to be based in Australia at any given time for pilot training.
Why so many CH-47’s?

Is that mainly because of the split fleet for training needs.
 

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
Why so many CH-47’s?

Is that mainly because of the split fleet for training needs.
Under the Australia-Singapore Military Training Initiative (ASMTI), Singapore will invest around A$2.25 billion for Australia to develop and enhance training areas to meet the future needs of the Australian Defence Force and facilitate an increased presence of SAF personnel; the Shoalwater Bay Training Area (SWBTA) expansion will see the training area for the SAF’s largest annual overseas training, Exercise Wallaby, grow significantly in size to allow for longer, more mechanised and integrated training across the SAF's three services. Together, the SWBTA and the new Greenvale Training Area (GVTA) will provide a military training area 10 times the size of Singapore.

Part of the reason for a split fleet is to support the anticipated increase in sorties needed in Australia (with the planned expansion of Ex Wallaby and Ex Trident at the SWBTA by 2024 and the GVTA by 2026) but more importantly:
(i) it is easy to forget that the Singapore’s conscript Army when fully mobilised, is more than 3 times bigger than Australia’s Army of 2 divisions; with the CH-47Fs required to simultaneously support the lift requirement of an entire rapid deployment division (i.e. the 21st division) and other heli-mobile brigades of the 3rd, 6th and 9th divisions (like 2 SIB); including the 21st division’s artillery brigade (more lift tonnage required to be moved than the Australian Army);​
(ii) Australia has 2 helicopter types with rear ramp doors, the MRH 90 and the CH-47F, whereas, Singapore only has 1 helicopter type with a rear ramp (for internal transport);​
(iii) the large side sponsons also enable these CH-47Fs to be employed for “Fat Cow” operations in support of the 21st division’s operations in forward arming and refuelling bases; to refuel the F-35Bs, Apaches, and H225Ms, using the Forward Area Refueling Equipment Kit. The fuel tanks on the inside the sponsons can be removed in approximately 15 minutes per tank — helping maintain the SAF’s interoperability with US Forces in the Indo-Pacific; and​
(iv) the SATCOM equipped CH-47Fs help increase the resilience of the SAF’s IKC2 battle net in support of special operations forces, when they are deployed from the future JMMS (or the current 4 Endurance class vessels).​
 
Last edited:

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
The future of the RSAF is to enable littoral dominance for the Singapore Navy

1. The Block 4 F-35 modernisation program will introduce a major electronics upgrade in Lot 15 aircraft (delivery in fiscal 2023). As Block 4 introduces new sensors and weapons on the aircraft, the overall weight of the aircraft is increasing, which creates concerns for the STOVL F-35B. Some foreign buyers are demanding greater range by improving fuel efficiency, adding external fuel tanks or both. The 1st of the 4 to 12 F-35Bs (block 4) to be acquired by Singapore from 2026 to 2028 (Lot 18 to 20) has five basic missions:

(i) air superiority, or offensive and defensive counterair;​

(ii) EW and suppression of enemy air defences (also known as SEAD);​

(iii) close air support;​

(iv) strategic attack against high-value strategic and mobile targets; and​

(v) extended surface warfare for maritime surveillance, identification and targeting.​

2. I would imagine that by the 2030s, Singapore’s F-35Bs would provide targeting information to F-15SGs, Fokker 50 MPAs, and the 1st Flotilla’s 6 MRCVs and 6 frigates, all carrying the Blue Spear anti-ship missile (being co-developed by ST Engineering and IAI).

3. I would also imagine that the 130 m long MRCVs will also carry its own organic ISR capabilities and these may include:
(i) fixed wing UAVs, potentially like the RQ-21 Blackjack, which not only can carry a NSP-5 radar (that weighs only 7.6kg) but also with an endurance of 16 hours and a range of 80km; and​
(ii) rotary wing UAVs, potentially like the Schiebel S-100 Camcopter or the MQ-8C Firescout.​

4. To be relevant, the 2nd Flotilla’s 12 vessels, that includes 8 LMVs (and not just the 1st Flotilla), are to be plugged into the air picture provided by the two aerostats, the Heron 1 UAVs, the G550AEWs and the F-35Bs. The 2nd Flotilla must have the not only ability to secure the littorals, they must posses a counter-RAM capability to protect against mortars fired by terrorists from Batam — to enable the Victory Class’ Barak 1 missiles to be retired by 2030.

5. We certainly can discuss it, but I think it is a common mistake to think of the future JMMS as a F-35B carrier. I believe 4 to 6 F-35Bs can land on it in an emergency (in a runway denied scenario — with most of the helicopters unloaded) but these 160 to 170 metre long ships are not primarily intended to be used as F-35B carriers. 550ft/168m is the minimum length for F-35B operations on a conventional flight deck (or with the addition of a ski jump the minimum take off distance required is 450ft/137m).

6. The increase in JMMS speed to 22 knots (up from 15 knots for the 141 m long Endurance) is an indication of a stronger ASW focus — which means the JMMS are designed as helicopter carriers first, alternate landing sites for F-35Bs second. For comparison, in length, the Canberra is 230m, Cavour is 244m, the Izumo is 248m; and two of these have ski-jumps. Further, the 120 to 135 aircrew embarked on the JMMS are from Participation Command (i.e. helicopter guys) and not from Fighter Command. If the RSAF’s maintenance guys from Fighter Command come onboard, there would be little or no bunk space for the crew chiefs of the Participation Command. Singapore’s JMMS by design, can land F-35Bs for sure but they can’t generate sorties for the F-35Bs. To generate sorties for F-35Bs from the JMMS, the Singapore Navy would need to allocate space for spare Pratt & Whitney F135 engines, parts and even missiles and bombs — when all this space is allocated for 7 SIB vehicles (aka the army) and the army’s sea transport company.

7. The biggest threat to our navy is submarines and we don’t have enough ships and Seahawks for ASW as it is — not sure why the Singapore Navy would want to assume a RSAF role (to fight for air superiority from land based air bases).
 
Last edited:

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
“After careful planning and preparations undertaken by both Australia and Singapore to minimise any potential COVID-19 risks to the Northern Territory, I am pleased we will be able to welcome the detachment from Singapore,” Minister Reynolds said.

“The arrival of the RSAF’s fighter detachment to conduct training in the Northern Territory underlines the strength of the Australia-Singapore partnership and our shared commitment to regional security.

Singapore’s military training in Australia is an important element of our Comprehensive Strategic Partnership.

It supports Singapore’s ability to generate a force that provides strategic weight and supports stability in our region.”
Thank you, Australia, for helping the RSAF at a time of need. Singapore has deployed aircraft and personnel to Australia for a two-month detachment from 7 Oct 2020 to 11 Dec 2020. Around 200 RSAF personnel - along with RSAF's F-15SGs, A330 MRTT and G550 AEW aircraft - will be stationed at Royal Australian Air Force Base Darwin during the course of the detachment.
 
Last edited:
Top