AIM-9M8/9 standards mate. Though why they don't go straight for AIM-9X ir IRIS-T or something, is beyond me...
Ya seriously dude..think that they can easily get IRIS-Ts easily from the european markets even if they dont get the AIM-9X..
AIM-9M8/9 standards mate. Though why they don't go straight for AIM-9X ir IRIS-T or something, is beyond me...
Diehl/BGT reportedly said that IRIS-T was on offer to PAF at IDEAS 2006.Ya seriously dude..think that they can easily get IRIS-Ts easily from the european markets even if they dont get the AIM-9X..
Ya seriously dude..think that they can easily get IRIS-Ts easily from the european markets even if they dont get the AIM-9X..
The dual-engine option is generally chosen when your AF must fight a large portion in a maritime role. Considering most of PAFs action will be overland it really shouldn't be a priority.
Has not the PAF dedicated many MirageIII/5's to the maritime role armed with exocets?
A country of 150Million and huge potential with a well trained airforce
So I feel its a illgitimate question and since The PAF have been operating Mirages since what the 1960/70s
why not buy a few second hand high maintenance su-27 types and just get em requiped with modern avionics and weapon sytems
or is the the PAF best served with Thunders and J10 with long range missiles
Pakistan covers a big area with lets say awkward neighbours isnt a robust defence important?
why would you want su-27s, when you can get J-10s?
If Pakistan is really just looking for a missile launcher, I suppose they will get CAC to work on a JF-17 capable of launching 2 C-802A/KD. It's not like the old days, China actually has an okay set of ground attack munitions now that it can sell to Pakistan.
air launched variants:
anti-ship: YJ-62/C-802A
ARM: YJ-91
Air to surface missile: C-802KD
LGBs: LT-2
SGB: FT-1/3, LS-6
How does AMX which is jointly built by Italy and Brazil, stands beside JF17. Does it have the same capabilities, or better.
China will not give Pakistan the license to build WS-13 and PAC does not have the resource to develop its own engine.Is PAC going to actually be making their own Advanced Aero engines down the road
even if its licenced built WS13's
For PAF latter JF-17s say 10 years from now
if not isnt that going to be an oversite if PAF ever wants to stand on it own feet
China will not give Pakistan the license to build WS-13 and PAC does not have the resource to develop its own engine.
China will not give Pakistan the license to build WS-13 and PAC does not have the resource to develop its own engine.
i wonder why they wont give the licence for the ws13 engines ,considering that pakistan is such a close ally and an all weather friend.
a modern turbofan engine is far more difficult to develop than a cheap plane like JF-17. And it was not in the context of the original agreement to provide Pakistan the ToT for engine.Aren't Pakistan & China supposed to be building the JF-17 together? If they can collaborate on a complete fighter, then why not an engine.