Welcome to DefenceTalk.com Forum!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Japan Air Self-Defence Force

Discussion in 'Air Force & Aviation' started by t68, Jun 8, 2015.

Share This Page

  1. t68

    t68 Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2006
    Messages:
    2,962
    Likes Received:
    24
    Location:
    NSW
    As I looked I could not find a JASDF thread my apologies if there is one,

    It appears that Japan has ordered 4x E2D Advanced Hawkeye for 1.7B USD, what I cant ascertain are these replacements or in addition to the current fleet,

    Once these new aircraft enter service can the remaining aircraft be rebuilt to E2D standards or do these need to be replaced as well?
     
  2. John Fedup

    John Fedup Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    2,785
    Likes Received:
    34
    Location:
    Vancouver and Toronto
    The new planes will augment the E2Cs. I am guessing an upgrade program was not considered economically viable as compared to a new purchase. The USN is replacing its fleet of Cs with Ds.
     
  3. White Water

    White Water New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2015
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Wrong side of the Pacific
    According to MoD website, Japanese E-2C's electronics were updated to Hawkeye 2000 level (no NP2000 propeller) about 10 years ago. I do not know the reason they did not go for complete package. Maybe cost? Or did not think about China and East China Sea? IMO another example of myopia.

    in Japanese (not linked so please copy, paste & add w w w. slowly approaching 10)

    mod.go.jp/asdf/equipment/keikaiki/E-2C/

    These additional E-2D's probably will be based in Okinawa.


    I read in a paper, Asahi (another yellow rag btw), that Airbus decided not to bid on 3 tankers. So, Boeing wins this $1B contract by default. I thought MRTT had better performance (further distance with more fuel). Japan already has 4 KC-767J's and 4 E-767's, so logistics wise KC-46's will be little easier on them. However, Japan has a tendency to throw in a requirement which cripples many bidders. So, this may have been the case.
     
  4. John Fedup

    John Fedup Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    2,785
    Likes Received:
    34
    Location:
    Vancouver and Toronto
  5. swerve

    swerve Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2006
    Messages:
    6,742
    Likes Received:
    11
    Location:
    Reading, Berkshire
    Airbus basically said "the requirement's rigged against us, so we won't waste time & money by bidding". In more diplomatic language, of course.
     
  6. White Water

    White Water New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2015
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Wrong side of the Pacific
    Thanks! This confirmed my feeling regarding an innocuous local content requirement causing havoc on some bidders. Politicians need to be reelected and bureaucrats will support them. So, bidders probably will be Sikorsky/Mitsubishi, AugustaWestland/Kawasaki, and Bell/Fuji. At least it won't be a single bid like tankers. I thought if Airbus can sell A350 to JAL, then it should try to sell MRTT to JASDF.
     
  7. ngatimozart

    ngatimozart Super Moderator Staff Member Verified Defense Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,591
    Likes Received:
    84
    Location:
    Christchurch, New Zealand
    The contract has been awarded for the first of three of the JASDF KC-46 aircraft with a value of US$279 million. There is a difference in the reported contract value for the first aircraft. Defense News states that it is US$289 million, with the total contract being estimated at US$1.9 billion.
     
    Ranger25 likes this.
  8. MrConservative

    MrConservative Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2007
    Messages:
    2,064
    Likes Received:
    114
    Location:
    Behind a Desk
    The JASDF are currently looking at the EA-18G as EW is an area where they have a capability gap. The KC-46 will eventually be capable of providing congruence to this beyond capability being a mere tanker.
     
  9. ngatimozart

    ngatimozart Super Moderator Staff Member Verified Defense Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,591
    Likes Received:
    84
    Location:
    Christchurch, New Zealand
  10. Rob c

    Rob c Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Messages:
    683
    Likes Received:
    19
    Location:
    Marton NZ
    Does seem a little odd, However the C2 does have a significantly greater range, AAR and a huge internal volume. If they are using several different mission modules this would also make sensible as it would be easy to swap them.
     
    ngatimozart likes this.
  11. kaz

    kaz Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2015
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Solomon
    The JASDF doesn't operate any P-1, so using the C-2 benefits logistics IMO.

    The JMSDF also has its own fleet of electronic warfare aircraft (P-3). IIRC, the Global Hawks (or another UAV) were supposed to fill in some of their roles after retirement. Saving the JMSDF the burden of finding 1-on-1 replacements.
     
  12. ngatimozart

    ngatimozart Super Moderator Staff Member Verified Defense Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,591
    Likes Received:
    84
    Location:
    Christchurch, New Zealand
    The JMSDF do operate the P-1 and there is some commonality between the P-1 and C-2. If it was decided to build a P-1 ELINT variant then there is no reason why the JASDF or the JMSDF operate it.
     
  13. FormerDirtDart

    FormerDirtDart Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2011
    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    6
  14. swerve

    swerve Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2006
    Messages:
    6,742
    Likes Received:
    11
    Location:
    Reading, Berkshire
    Except that's how they do it: JASDF & JMSDF have separate areas of responsibility, & separate fleets of aircraft. The JMSDF operates the P-3C for ELINT, alongside its MPA & optical recce P-3Cs, & the JASDF operates a C-1 alongside its C-1 transports, & a few YS-11s, which I think are now the last YS-11s in the JASDF but which used to operate alongside YS-11 transports. Yes, they could change the way they do things, but I doubt the JASDF would be happy to hand over all its EW capacity to the JMSDF, & it wouldn't make logistical sense for the JASDF to operate a handful of P-1s while the JMSDF operated the other 90% of the fleet.
     
    ngatimozart likes this.
  15. ngatimozart

    ngatimozart Super Moderator Staff Member Verified Defense Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,591
    Likes Received:
    84
    Location:
    Christchurch, New Zealand
    Lockheed are being reported as proposing a F-22 / F-35 hybrid to the JASDF, in an answer to a Japanese RFI. Apparently the Japanese F-3 program has stalled, likely due to the cost of going it alone. The Japanese could be looking at an aircraft with the sensors and data fusion ability of the F-35 and range of the F-22 . The F-3 is the replacement for the F-2 and F-15J.
     
  16. John Fedup

    John Fedup Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    2,785
    Likes Received:
    34
    Location:
    Vancouver and Toronto
    I posted this proposal in the military aviation thread. Apparently it will need US government approval first. No mention if the design was single or twin engine but engines and radar are to be sourced in Japan.
     
    ngatimozart likes this.
  17. the concerned

    the concerned Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    334
    Likes Received:
    1
    The proposed hybrid fighter that LM are suggesting could be an option for not just Japan but many other nations Israel for one. Maybe an option for the USAF themselves.
     
  18. John Fedup

    John Fedup Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    2,785
    Likes Received:
    34
    Location:
    Vancouver and Toronto
    There are not too many allies which can afford JSFs and air superiority fighters which is what this new fighter proposal is. Also, it will take some time to develop. Unfortunately this proposal might provide an excuse for junior to get around a RCAF F-35 purchase or for more delay. As for the USAF, unlikely as they are already working on 6th Gen fighters. The Japanese have stated this LM design would have to have engines and radars sourced from Japan which won't be cost effective for the limited export market. IMO, if this jet existed, it would be an easier sale for left wingers here to accept as air superiority fighters are seen as interceptors defending Canadian sovereignty. A higher price wouldn't matter. If this jet happens, the only likely export market would be Israel and maybe Australia. A major ally partnering with Japan could be a different story.
     
  19. the concerned

    the concerned Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    334
    Likes Received:
    1
    A while ago I was talking about the possibility of taking the F-35 down the superhornet route would this be a viable air superiority option especially if you twin engine it
     
  20. t68

    t68 Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2006
    Messages:
    2,962
    Likes Received:
    24
    Location:
    NSW
    not 100% sure if you suggesting twin engine the current F35, but if so that a major departure from the design and would have to be totally redesigned from scratch. That would be a new aircraft program along with associated R&D cost and all that it entails.