There's a country which always annoying when Indonesia explores or exploits O&G on Indonesia's SCS EEZ. Always files diplomatic protest to Jakarta on these activities. Indonesia has no border with that country. Today Indonesia wants to buy more weapons from that country. Amazing!
From X id Alman Helvas aka Frenchie Salesman,
3. Finally, a statement from @AHelvas I can agree with; it does not make sense for the TNI AU to buy Chinese fighters. The Prabowo admin must be extremely corrupt to consider 2nd hand J-10A/Bs — there is 99% chance that the PLAAF’s countermeasures will work against TNI AU J-10s.
From X id lhsingapura
This Guys seems have quite followers within Indonesian Defense communities, so I put them as part of opinion against any procurement from China. Frenchie Salesman basically against any procurement outside French or Euro NATO, and even put negative ranting against Turkiye procurement as pointed out basically unproven sub par non NATO standard. While lhsingapura more US centric and want TNI-AU to focus on improving their US base assets.
Before that, let me reiterate my personal opinion. As TNI-AU already invest much with Frenchie stuff, I want 100 Rafale. No more Flankers, no more F-16, no F-15, no J-10, no KF-21, no KAAN and if Interim fighters needed, let be ex Gulf Mirage 2K. Do I agree with Frenchies salesman? No far from it. However if TNI already invest much on Dasault system, with limited budget available then better goes all the way with Dasault.
However I sense that will not happen. So let's talk about J-10. Yes it will have Chinese system, Chinese missiles and can be problematic if have face situation in LCS against China. However will that make procurement of J-10 or Chinese weapons heavily corrupted as lhsingapura claim? Off course not, that's missleading accusation. This is Indonesia and
every government procurement can be corrupted. Heck even previous procurement from Boeing (Apache E) being consider have some anomalies by state auditor (BPK). So whether procure from China, Russia, French, Turkiye or US, doesn't matter. Indonesia political systems provide equal opportunity of corruption chances.
So back to problem with systems, can procuring Chinese system be working out with other Western assets ? Let's see previous PAF engagement with IAF. PAF Swedish AEW&C and their Western base GCI seems can coordinate fine with Chinese base system in J-10 and JF-17. PAF abilities on systems coordination even can overcome IAF on systems. In the end like any modern engagement, overall systems awareness that matter.
So the key is making the whole systems to be interconnected and provide overall awareness. This is already shown since the 80's-90's and shown during first Gulf War. However what PAF shown is they can integrate different bases system and make it as their own awareness environment.
Could TNI do that ? That's the question. There're efforts to do that, like building common systems interface with Greece Systalis as main vendor. Is that working ? I don't know, but from what I gather it is working but not yet fully integrated yet.
So what if China give J-10 with open architecture system for Indonesia as offer? Can it still be workout? Whay if J-10 they offer have open source code that can be integrated with other Western base systems including western base missiles. Will that be still worth it ? Seems that what Deputy Defense Minsister implied still being asses on what China offering.
My points is, yes the system awareness is the most important thing on overall modern military engagement. PAF recent experiences already shown how they manage to do that from various systems base. Will TNI-AU able to do that ? Will overall TNI systems from 3 branches can communicate ? That's the big questions, and more important then just simply talk which systems coming from. How to integrare is more important question.